-
7 votes
-
The Most Powerful Publishers in the World Don’t Give a Damn
21 votes -
Jeffrey Katzenberg raises $1 billion for short-form video venture
4 votes -
After mainstream exposure, QAnon is starting to fracture
16 votes -
Leaked white paper proposes Congressional regulation of social media
14 votes -
IGN removes Dead Cells review after YouTuber's plagiarism accusations
2 votes -
YouTube deletes Alex Jones' channel for violating its community guidelines
46 votes -
Facebook in talks with banks to add your financial information to Messenger
18 votes -
Facebook deletes InfoWars pages
20 votes -
How does Mastodon work?
14 votes -
Is the Tildes section model compatible with injokes and microcultures?
Something you see frequently on Reddit are subreddits that have developed their own slang, jokes and references. That's part of the reason why Reddit feels like a collection of communities more...
Something you see frequently on Reddit are subreddits that have developed their own slang, jokes and references. That's part of the reason why Reddit feels like a collection of communities more than one website divided into sections, which is what Tildes look like right now.
The question is, do we want that sort of stuff here?10 votes -
'Damoclean sword': Michaela Banerji is still fighting after five years. The former Immigration Department official said her sacking after a tweet "drove a stake" through her.
3 votes -
The phenomenon of spammy Asian accounts on Facebook support forum
That's a mouthful but I'm really curious what drives the situation when you go on the Facebook support forum, on popular threads there's tons of people posting absolutely nonsense comments that...
That's a mouthful but I'm really curious what drives the situation when you go on the Facebook support forum, on popular threads there's tons of people posting absolutely nonsense comments that have nothing to do with the topic, and a lot of them are accounts from Asia... has anyone else noticed this? Are they just spamming to get account visibility?
3 votes -
Killing speech softly: How the world’s biggest tech companies are quietly censoring critical expression in the Middle East
6 votes -
Meet the YouTube Stars Turning Viewers Into Readers
14 votes -
Reddit servers breached; full backup from 2007 (including hashed+salted passwords) obtained by attackers
77 votes -
Psychological language on Twitter predicts county-level heart disease mortality
3 votes -
Will Tildes eventually move to a Reddit-hot-like post sorting algorithm?
The current 4chan-like default sorting method doesn't look like it's going to scale with more people and posts coming in, thoughts?
7 votes -
Everything bad about Facebook is bad for the same reason
17 votes -
538 shares largest dataset of Russian troll tweets, compiled by two professors at Clemson University
17 votes -
11,000 Wikileaks Twitter DMs have just been published for anyone to read
10 votes -
To which extent do you think it is useful to call bullshit on Facebook posts?
So I have a few high school friends in Facebook who recently have become more radical (islamophobia, racism, sexism, identitarianism, etc.). As I said in a recent thread I have almost everyone but...
So I have a few high school friends in Facebook who recently have become more radical (islamophobia, racism, sexism, identitarianism, etc.). As I said in a recent thread I have almost everyone but family blocked on my feed, but sometimes I make it a point to go to their profiles and see what they have posted. It usually is a lot of disinformation, misdirection, and dog whistling. I try to call them out because younger kids in my town look up to people like them and I'm worried they will become a bad influence. I also hope that, even though they will probably not become anarchists (or even run-of-the-mill conservatives) tomorrow, at least they will be a bit more empathetic to other people's pain.
My question is, do you think it is useful to do this? Will their posts or my rebuttals make any difference at all? How do you react in these situations?
More broadly speaking, is it important to have people calling bullshit when other people say blatant lies? Or is it useless and that energy would be better spent somewhere else?
On the one hand even if it is just for signaling to other people (in my particular example, muslims, the LGBTQ community, etc.) that they are not alone it seems like a good thing to do. On the other hand, I'm finding it less and less likely every day that anyone will change their opinion on anything without a massive investment in bots/shills/astroturfers. Or a good psychedelic trip :-D.I am curious to hear your experiences regarding this and it is something I have discussed in person with other people and I always hear good arguments from both (and more) sides. Hopefully this is the right group/kind of thread and I'm doing the tag thing correctly, it is my first thread here !
15 votes -
On social media what filters do you have to block content? Any motivation beyond "not interested"?
On Tildes I don't have any filtered tags yet but I did unsubscribe from ~anime, ~books, ~food, ~games, ~movies, ~sports, and ~tv. Wow I just made that list and realized I cut out most of the fun...
On Tildes I don't have any filtered tags yet but I did unsubscribe from ~anime, ~books, ~food, ~games, ~movies, ~sports, and ~tv. Wow I just made that list and realized I cut out most of the fun groups... I'm not sure what that says about me haha. I unsubscribed from all of those because I either don't enjoy those things or if I do, I know what I like and don't have any inclination to discuss them.
Reddit is where I have the most things filtered out. Mostly entire subs from r/all but I have some users blocked too. Like poem_for_your_sprog. Don't get me wrong I like poems in the right context but it throws me off too much when I'm reading an askreddit thread and suddenly find myself reading a poem. A dumb pet peeve.
Facebook it's just random people blocked from showing on the newsfeed.
I have said "not interested" to videos on youtube more times than I would ever care to count. I'm not sure why but they have a really hard time giving me content I want to see. There's usually like 3 videos in the feed I'm down with and the rest is just garbage. They're good about not showing me things I said I'm not interested in but they can't seem to pinpoint what I actually want.
15 votes -
A withering verdict: MPs report on Zuckerberg, Russia and Cambridge Analytica
14 votes -
India looking to compel e-commerce, social media firms to store data locally
5 votes -
When a stranger decides to destroy your life
28 votes -
How Facebook is undermining democracy - Prof. Siva Vaidhyanathan
5 votes -
It’s Rubens vs. Facebook in fight over artistic nudity
5 votes -
Facebook suspends US conspiracy theorist Alex Jones
7 votes -
Google said to deliberately make YouTube slower on Microsoft Edge, Firefox
35 votes -
Facebook is the first company to see its market cap drop by over 100 billion USD in one day
16 votes -
Facebook's quarterly earnings show user growth hit record lows in Q2
19 votes -
Departing Facebook security officer's memo: "We need to be willing to pick sides"
6 votes -
Is Hacker News suppressing leftist articles? Or just a conspiracy of poor point scoring?
There was a story posted to Hacker News, The Return of the Super-Elite from Jacobin magazine. It was on the front page for a little bit of time. I refreshed and it was on the 2nd page. 5 hours...
There was a story posted to Hacker News, The Return of the Super-Elite from Jacobin magazine. It was on the front page for a little bit of time. I refreshed and it was on the 2nd page.
5 hours later and it's down to #113, page 4. It has 88 points. The second youngest submission on page 4 is 16 hours old. On page 3, the youngest item is 6 hours old, and has only 7 points. So this article is newer, has a respectable amount of points but within 5 hours has been relegated to page 4, whereas an item that has fewer points and is 1 hour older is sitting on page 3.
edit: the rank keeps dropping, when I first wrote this post it was at #111, then #112, and when I submitted it was at #113, I just refreshed and it's at #114. Other submissions near the range of points and hours are ranking on page 1. On page 5 all items are from 1, 2 or 3 days ago.
I've noticed that any pro-unionization talk seems to disappear much more quickly than other stories.
So let's get our tinfoil hats on and ask is Hacker News suppressing leftist articles or suppressing articles of a certain type altogether?
Or maybe it's just a conspiracy of a bad algorithm for determining where submissions rank?
26 votes -
GOP to Silicon Valley: Promote the far right or else
3 votes -
Taking away the phones won’t solve our teenagers’ problems
19 votes -
Truth, disrupted
8 votes -
The Elon Musk impersonators of the internet - For cryptocurrency scammers, imitation is the sincerest form of fraud
7 votes -
A global guide to state-sponsored trolling
15 votes -
James Gunn fired as director of 'Guardians of the Galaxy' franchise over offensive tweets
19 votes -
The SIM Hijackers
8 votes -
Reddit reinvents the chat room with subreddit chat
31 votes -
The Twitch streamers who spend years broadcasting to no one
26 votes -
Hooktube is dead
Hooktube.com used to provide a private way to view youtube vids, blocking ads, bypassing region locks, and also pulling comments and search results via the api. All you had to do was replace the...
Hooktube.com used to provide a private way to view youtube vids, blocking ads, bypassing region locks, and also pulling comments and search results via the api. All you had to do was replace the you in a youtube link with hook.
No more. On July 11, this appeared on the changelog:
HookTube no longer uses YouTube api for anything, and most features (channel page, search, related videos, etc) are gone. No choice.
Which was extremely bad, but at least you could still watch videos privately right?
July 16: YouTube api features are back but mp4 <video> is replaced with the standard YT video embed. HookTube is now effectively just a light-weight version of youtube and useless to the 90% of you primarily concerned with denying Google data and seeing videos blocked by your governments.
rest in pieces
It was a good run, 1.5 years. Started as a quickly made addition to the norbot project, and within long the server had to be upgraded several times. Of course YouTube Legal was an inevitability at that point.
Special thanks to the many people who created plugins and extensions for hooktube, /g/, the five people who donated anonymously, and BitChute for working hard on a real YouTube alternative. HookTube will remain operational in the present state for those who only needed it for performance reasons. See you in the next project.:(
Alternatives include: invidio.us, youtube-dl, the Freetube desktop app, Newpipe for Android, and
you’re doomed if you use iOS.ETA: Actually, I just remembered, there’s Media Grabber for the Workflow app. And Invidio mostly works on mobile.15 votes -
Women making science videos on YouTube face hostile comments
11 votes -
We are all public figures now
31 votes -
The woman in the #PlaneBae saga says she's been 'shamed, insulted, and harassed' since the story went viral and asks for her privacy
4 votes -
Elon Musk criticized for trying to help. Accused of selfish PR stunt.
23 votes -
Battling fake accounts, Twitter to slash millions of followers
7 votes -
Box CEO Aaron Levie says mistrust of Google and Facebook is a ‘contagion’ that could spread to every tech company
21 votes