-
18 votes
-
How DuPont may avoid paying to clean up a toxic 'forever chemical' in the US
10 votes -
Policy vs technology
15 votes -
The multimillion-dollar Christian group attacking LGBTQ+ rights
19 votes -
More than fifty people died under Victoria's euthanasia scheme during its first six months
5 votes -
How would you reduce speeding by car drivers?
I was reading this twitter post and it made me wonder if you have any ideas to stop speeding by car drivers? Have any of these ideas been tried anywhere? I'm also interested in unintended...
I was reading this twitter post and it made me wonder if you have any ideas to stop speeding by car drivers? Have any of these ideas been tried anywhere? I'm also interested in unintended consequences.
https://twitter.com/agnessjonsson/status/1229103764843438086?s=20
Agnes @agnessjonsson
fact of the day: Sweden once experimented with a “speed camera lottery”. Those who drove within the speed limit were automatically entered into a drawing where the prize fund came from fines that speeders paid.
They tested it in a few different cities and I haven’t read the results of each one, but in Stockholm the average speed on the selected road decreased by 22 percent.
17 votes -
I’ve fought for a free internet for thirty years. Here’s where I think we went wrong, and right
15 votes -
Re-evaluating the DMCA twenty-two years later: Let’s think of the users
13 votes -
Bad company: The corporate appropriation of nature, divinity, and personhood in US culture
6 votes -
The Sprint/T-Mobile merger: A jump-the-shark moment for American antitrust?
7 votes -
Modern copyright law is a joke
8 votes -
Switzerland votes to ban homophobic discrimination
10 votes -
California’s new privacy law is off to a rocky start
12 votes -
Sweden has been criticized by the UN for failings when it comes to the rights of the indigenous Sámi people
9 votes -
Got lacteal secretions? Virginia tries to limit the legal definition of milk.
7 votes -
California's new groundwater law explained
9 votes -
Prohibition was a failed US experiment in moral governance
13 votes -
Putin has suggested a bunch of constitutional amendments. Here’s what he wants to change
21 votes -
Judge rules that student loan debt is dischargeable in bankruptcy
18 votes -
The code of capital: How the law creates wealth and inequality
6 votes -
California's new employment law is starting to crush freelancers
5 votes -
JK Rowling's Maya Forstater tweets support hostile work environments, not free speech
27 votes -
The law that helped the internet flourish now undermines democracy
8 votes -
US Congress raises legal age to buy tobacco products to 21
14 votes -
Home Alone | Laws Broken
5 votes -
There are now traffic cameras that can spot you using your phone while driving
9 votes -
European Commission refers Denmark to the Court for failing to fulfil its obligations in relation to the name 'Feta'
4 votes -
Uber has been refused a licence to operate in London, UK
17 votes -
Russians under threat for Q&A video
7 votes -
From January, jet fuel suppliers in Norway must blend 0.5% of biofuel in all their aviation fuel – a policy Oslo hopes will lead to lower CO2 emissions
7 votes -
The case of the shotgun booby trap
6 votes -
Google is an emerging health-care juggernaut, and privacy laws weren’t written to keep up
14 votes -
Germany makes measles vaccination compulsory
10 votes -
China introduces restrictions on video games for minors
8 votes -
London protest ban on Extinction Rebellion ruled unlawful
10 votes -
New Hampshire lawmaker blocks device repair bill, tells constituents to just buy new $1k phones
7 votes -
EU passes “Right to repair” Law to make large appliances easier to repair starting from 2021
31 votes -
Family of teen who died from Ecstacy support legalisation
8 votes -
Video games in China: beyond the great firewall
6 votes -
House overwhelmingly approves contentious new copyright bill
19 votes -
It's not just a bunch of flowers - Why supporting Extinction Rebellion in a spirit of cooperation and friendship has, at times, been extraordinarily difficult
10 votes -
Why US cities are banning new fast food drive-throughs
8 votes -
Set to rights – Iceland's new Gender Autonomy Act
7 votes -
California is banning the tiny bottles of shampoo in hotels
11 votes -
Europe's top court has upheld the strict protection that EU law offers to Finnish wolves and other species
4 votes -
Shame on those who defend the "loving smack": it's just plain violence against children
19 votes -
Transgender man who gave birth must be registered as "mother" on the birth certificate
11 votes -
According to leaked emails from Natalia Veselnitskaya, Russia’s disinformation campaign may have broken U.S. law and exposed details of a witness who later fell from a window
6 votes -
Jews and Muslims in Sweden outraged over call to ban male circumcision
17 votes -
Doctors working for the Department for Work and Pensions must respect a service user's pronoun choice
This is a bit complicated. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is the government department that pays social security benefits in the UK. There are a range of benefits. Some of these...
This is a bit complicated.
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is the government department that pays social security benefits in the UK. There are a range of benefits. Some of these benefits are for people who cannot work because of disability. In order to qualify for some of these disability benefits you need to have a medical assessment with an "independent" doctor. This doctor is independent from the patient. They're employed by companies who are paid by the DWP, so there's supposed to be some kind of arm's length arrangement there.
A doctor was employed by one of these companies to do this assessment work for the DWP. He was a committed Christian. He held that he would not be able to refer to people by anything other than the gender they were assigned at birth.
The DWP is clear: you must respect a person's choice of pronouns.
The General Medical Council (the registrant body for doctors in England) is also clear: you must not impose your personal views upon your patients, especially if it's going to cause distress.
This doctor was spoken to about his beliefs. He declined to change his stance. He lost his job. He took his employer to employment tribunal for unfair dismissal based on discrimination against his protected characteristic: his religious views.
He lost his case.
Here's the legal document: https://christianconcern.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/CC-Resource-Judgment-Mackereth-DWP-Others-ET-191002.pdf
It's pretty long! 42 pages! The last pages give a summary.
You'll notice the URL. He was supported by the Christian Legal Centre. I won't say anything about them, but I'll link this page which gives some useful information: https://nearlylegal.co.uk/2018/04/on-the-naughty-step-the-questionable-ethics-of-the-christian-legal-centre/
8 votes