-
18 votes
-
NixOS and secrets
13 votes -
AI is breaking two vulnerability cultures
18 votes -
Behind the scenes hardening Firefox with Claude Mythos Preview
20 votes -
Dirty Frag, an exploit which can obtain root privileges on major Linux distributions
31 votes -
Linux privilege escalation (CVE-2026-31431)
49 votes -
US National Security Agency using Anthropic's Mythos despite blacklist
10 votes -
USA to mandate surveillance tech for new cars also determing fitness to drive by 2027
44 votes -
Synthesizing multi-agent harnesses for vulnerability discovery
9 votes -
Ring camera is getting more and more annoying
I've had a ring camera for several years. Historically I've been mostly satisfied with it, but lately they are adding some features that are pretty annoying. The worst is that they've been adding...
I've had a ring camera for several years. Historically I've been mostly satisfied with it, but lately they are adding some features that are pretty annoying.
The worst is that they've been adding neighborhood alerts and other proximity alerts, with categories for traffic and weather and lost pets and things like that. Today I got a "community alert" which was actually an advertisement for a local animal shelter. I don't have anything against animal shelters, but my motion detector camera alter is not the correct venue for this message. It's clear that amazon is trying to muscle in on Nextdoor. I don't use Nextdoor. I find it to be like facebook, full of cranks and advertisements and nosey annoying people.
So now I had to wade through a few pages of menus to find where to turn of this new annoyance. Obviously, if I could I would opt out of all new features.The other annoying thing is that they turned on some AI evaluation of what the camera sees. So I was getting messages like "there's someone with a garden hose on your lawn" or "a person is carrying a cardboard box". There were a few things wrong with this
- I didn't sign up to have this and it slows down the alerts so they are up to 30 seconds after the motion is detected
- The AI sometimes made errors, especially at certain times of day where it misidentified different things in the yard (for example, some place marked by shadow was interpreted as a sidewalk when there isn't a sidewalk there). This happens of course because the AI doesn't know anything about my property, it evaluates everything from scratch each time it looks at an image.
- The ring app started bugging me with upselling messages to pay extra for the AI messages
So yeah. I just wanted to vent about the enshittification of this thing. I'm also aware of the privacy issues of ring cameras and how they're going to use the "pet finder" functionality to keep track of everyone. But this rant isn't really about that more important stuff, just the frustration of how these tech companies won't just leave anything alone because they have different goals than us.
33 votes -
Making the most pickproof lock yet
14 votes -
No one can force me to have a secure website!!!
36 votes -
Project Glasswing: securing critical software for the AI era
25 votes -
Claude Mythos preview
25 votes -
Curl will end its bug bounty program by the end of January due to excessive AI generated reports
63 votes -
Introducing EmDash — the spiritual successor to WordPress that solves plugin security
27 votes -
Denuvo DRM has been cirmumvented using hypervisor based bypass
51 votes -
Google partners with Back Market to distribute ChromeOS Flex USB sticks
15 votes -
Email obfuscation: What works in 2026?
26 votes -
Audio steganography in supply chain attacks
16 votes -
UK government blocks Chinese firm’s plans to build wind turbines in Scotland
13 votes -
Norway and Iceland have signed agreements to participate in the European Union's GOVSATCOM and IRIS2 secure communications programmes
12 votes -
Android to debut "advanced flow" for sideloading unverified applications
63 votes -
US regulator bans imports of new foreign-made routers, citing security concerns
58 votes -
At twenty airports in the United States, security screening is handled not by the Transportation Security Administration, but by private companies — and their checkpoints aren’t seeing long lines
22 votes -
Need help deciding if I need to replace my Pixel running grapheneOS
so like most of the community, I wanted to do a dance when I saw https://tildes.net/~tech/1t09/motorola_and_grapheneos_foundation_partnership_announced. However I have a Google Pixel 6 and...
so like most of the community, I wanted to do a dance when I saw https://tildes.net/~tech/1t09/motorola_and_grapheneos_foundation_partnership_announced. However I have a Google Pixel 6 and according to this page, that stops getting security updates this October.
now what I can't tell is is it a better idea to wait for the new moto+grapheneOS phone or bite the bullet and buy a supported pixel. I don't know if anyone know how long until a moto+grapheneOS phone actually hits the market. If it's next year, not a big deal to wait. If it's 2+ years, I get worried about missing out on security updates.
Not sure the best course of action, security wise.
14 votes -
Hackers expose the massive surveillance stack hiding inside your “age verification” check
53 votes -
Iran-backed hackers claim wiper attack on medtech firm Stryker
21 votes -
Hardening Firefox with Anthropic’s red team
37 votes -
Arc Raiders - Discord SDK data exposure
16 votes -
LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy
44 votes -
Motorola and GrapheneOS Foundation partnership announced
85 votes -
Google quantum-proofs HTTPS by squeezing 15kB of data into 700-byte space
26 votes -
Leaked email suggests Ring plans to expand ‘search party’ surveillance beyond dogs
64 votes -
New AirSnitch attack breaks Wi-Fi encryption in homes, offices, and enterprises
16 votes -
The internet was weeks away from disaster and no one knew
15 votes -
Keenadu – a multifaceted Android malware that can come preinstalled on new devices
12 votes -
The watchers: how OpenAI, the US government, and Persona built an identity surveillance machine that files reports on you to the feds
25 votes -
The mega-rich are turning their mansions into impenetrable fortresses
50 votes -
A comparative security analysis of three cloud-based password managers
15 votes -
Human-driven global warming could cause the collapse of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation, a powerful ocean current system, and throw Iceland into a deep freeze
18 votes -
archive.today is directing a DDOS attack against my blog
71 votes -
Update on developer access and platform security | Spotify for Developers
10 votes -
Google's quarterly report on adversarial use of AI for Q4 2025
11 votes -
US Federal Aviation Administration reopens El Paso airport hours after saying it was grounding flights for ten days
16 votes -
Airspace closure in the Texas border city of El Paso followed spat over drone-related tests and party balloon shoot-down, sources say
13 votes -
US FBI stymied by Apple’s Lockdown Mode after seizing journalist’s iPhone
36 votes -
AI will compromise your cybersecurity posture
8 votes -
I need a sanity check from security experts (opening ports on the router)
First, let me just say that I'm tech savvy, but I'm self taught for the most part. I never studied cybersecurity or network security. I know the basics, but not the nitty-gritty. I used to host my...
First, let me just say that I'm tech savvy, but I'm self taught for the most part. I never studied cybersecurity or network security. I know the basics, but not the nitty-gritty.
I used to host my own Anytype Server (note taking app) on my raspberry pi. To do this, the documentation says that I need to open two ports, one TCP and another UDP. So that's what I did, and had it set up this way for a while now.
Yesterday though, my raspberry's microSD died. So while I wait for the new one to arrive, I'm taking the chance to review my home network settings.
I closed off a third port that I had for my synology server (for the OpenVPN). I am now using Wireguard (with Tailscale) which doesn't require opening ports. And since my raspberry is offline, I also turned off the other two ports (as of now, I have none opened)
So here's the thing: I remember from my searching that a lot of people are strongly averse to opening ports. Iirc, the basic idea is that if a bad actor knows my home IP and which ports are open, they can enter. So, in theory, a hacker could potentially infiltrate my raspberry pi - and from there potentially wreak havoc in my other devices.
So my questions are:
1- Is it really like that? Could a hacker gain unlimited access to my raspberry via an opened port?
2- If yes, is there something that I can do to strengthen my raspberry pi security?
3- Am I being overly paranoid by worrying about this, even if it’s theoretically possible?12 votes -
Notepad++ hijacked by state-sponsored hackers
55 votes