-
11 votes
-
In defense of hellfire: The rhetoric of damnation has been lost. But how else can we adequately condemn injustice?
8 votes -
The vampire problem: Illustrating the paradox of transformative experience
8 votes -
Why did GE Moore disappear from history?
9 votes -
At the limits of thought: Science today stands at a crossroads--will its progress be driven by human minds or by the machines that we’ve created?
3 votes -
Je regrette tout: Does moral growth demand regret?
7 votes -
A big little idea called legibility
10 votes -
Politics and the beautiful soul
6 votes -
Doing being rational: polymerase chain reaction
3 votes -
Truth be sold: How truth became a product
12 votes -
"Both studies ... sought to pin down how many times the human brain oscillates in and out of focus per minute."
6 votes -
Nihilism
7 votes -
How doctors die
21 votes -
What is space? It’s not what you think.
7 votes -
Modesty means more, not less
9 votes -
Bad company: The corporate appropriation of nature, divinity, and personhood in U.S. culture
6 votes -
The Stone Lion Racism Test - Who owns the Shisa?
8 votes -
Ignorance, a skilled practice
5 votes -
Do hierarchies lead to a stronger society?
7 votes -
Why the simple life is not just beautiful, it’s necessary
9 votes -
The parable of the pebbles
5 votes -
How do you convince someone of the value of egalitarianism?
An odd question to ask, I'll admit, but I think it's worth asking. It's hard to have a public conversation today about political or politicised topics because people will pipe up and tell you that...
An odd question to ask, I'll admit, but I think it's worth asking.
It's hard to have a public conversation today about political or politicised topics because people will pipe up and tell you that you're crazy and your ideas are completely backwards. And the reason why people say this is often driven by conflicts between personally held values rather than the ideas themselves. As a result, these conversations usually end up with both sides arguing past eachother and no concensus is ever made; nobody is happy.
One of the more common reasons for these arguements is typically because one party believes in egalitarianism - the belief that all people should be treated the same - and the other one does not. It's particularly strange to see given that so many countries have egalitarianism as a cornerstone to their government and laws. Yet we still see many people trying to take away rights and freedoms from certain classes of people.
Regardless of any particular conversation, what do you think is the best way to convince someone in the value of egalitarianism? How do you convince someone that they're not part of a higher class who has power over another?
13 votes -
The Principle of Charitable Interpretation
13 votes -
Why ‘nature’ has no place in environmental philosophy
4 votes -
How Mengzi came up with something better than the Golden Rule
7 votes -
Financial Bubbles are the Gnostic Heresy: The Voegelin-Minsky Synthesis
5 votes -
An Illustrated Book of Bad Arguments
9 votes -
The key to a good life is avoiding pain (Epicurus)
6 votes -
The unlikeliest cult in history
11 votes -
Has science shown that consciousness is only an illusion?
6 votes -
A famous argument against free will has been debunked
19 votes -
The why of the world
2 votes -
The Egg
23 votes -
The Trolley Problem
An interesting thought experiment that I vividly remember from undergrad philosophy courses is the trolley problem: You see a runaway trolley moving toward five tied-up (or otherwise...
An interesting thought experiment that I vividly remember from undergrad philosophy courses is the trolley problem:
You see a runaway trolley moving toward five tied-up (or otherwise incapacitated) people lying on the main track. You are standing next to a lever that controls a switch. If you pull the lever, the trolley will be redirected onto a side track, and the five people on the main track will be saved. However, there is a single person lying on the side track. You have two options:
- Do nothing and allow the trolley to kill the five people on the main track.
- Pull the lever, diverting the trolley onto the side track where it will kill one person.
A variation of the problem that we were also presented with was:
You see a runaway trolley moving toward five tied-up (or otherwise incapacitated) people lying on the main track. You are standing on a bridge that runs across the trolley tracks. There is a large man on the bridge next to you, who if pushed over the bridge and onto the track, would safely stop the trolley, saving the five people but killing the large man. Do you:
- Push the man over the bridge, saving the five people.
- Allow the trolley to kill the five people
Which is the more ethical options? Or, more simply: What is the right thing to do?
17 votes -
What are the ethical consequences of immortality technology?
9 votes -
Henry Flynt: The meaning of my avant-garde hillbilly and blues music
6 votes -
Spot the psychopath: Psychopaths have a reputation for cunning and ruthlessness. But they are more like you and me than we care to admit
6 votes -
Excerpt from "Myth and Ritual in Christianity" by A. Watts
... The very insistence on the one historical incarnation as a unique step in a course of events leading to the future Kingdom of God reveals the psychology of Western culture most clearly. It...
... The very insistence on the one historical incarnation as a unique step in a course of events leading to the future Kingdom of God reveals the psychology of Western culture most clearly. It shows a mentality for which the present, real world is, in itself, joyless and barren, without value. The present can have value only in terms of meaning—if, like a word, it points to something beyond itself. This "beyond" which past and present events "mean" is the future. This the Western intellectual, as well as the literate common man, finds his life meaningless except in terms of a promising future. But the future is a "tomorrow which never comes", and for this reason Western culture has a "frantic" character. It is a desperate rush in pursuit of an ever-receding "meaning", because the promising future is precisely the famous carrot which the clever driver dangles before his donkey's nose from the end of his whip. Tragically enough, this frantic search for God, for the ideal life, in the future renders the course of history anything but a series of unique steps towards a goal. Its real result is to make history repeat itself faster and more furiously, confusing "progress" with increased agitation.
—Alan Watts, Myth and Ritual in Christianity. 1954
11 votes -
The hypersane are among us, if only we are prepared to look
4 votes -
Tainted by association: Would you carve a roast with a knife that had been used in a murder? Why not? And what does this tell us about ethics?
17 votes -
What is your favorite thought experiment?
Mine is: do others see the same colours that I do? As in, is my "green" the same as your "green"? Or would my "green" look "blue" to you? I like this one because it's completely possible, points...
Mine is: do others see the same colours that I do? As in, is my "green" the same as your "green"? Or would my "green" look "blue" to you? I like this one because it's completely possible, points out the plasticity of our minds and makes a distinction between sensation and perception. There are variations of this but I like it formulated as such. It's my favorite because it was also my first foray into the philosophy of consciousness and I'm often reminded of it when in an altered state of consciousness (e.g. by psychedelics).
Your favorite experiment can be whatever: either something that has affected you deeply / changed your life or just something fun and amusing to think about.
48 votes -
Curious about consciousness? Ask the self-aware machines
5 votes -
Can animals commit crimes?
8 votes -
The Impossible Dream - How have we come to build a whole culture around a futile, self-defeating enterprise: the pursuit of happiness?
9 votes -
The first socialist
7 votes -
C.S. Peirce on science and belief
4 votes -
Like Michael Jackson and R Kelly's songs but not them? Ethical approaches for how to deal with it
11 votes -
"Work," from "The Philosophy of Andy Warhol"
4 votes -
Two kinds of freedom
8 votes -
If anyone can see the morally unthinkable online, what then?
5 votes