-
9 votes
-
According to IRS leaked US data Warren Buffett sometimes privately traded stocks that Berkshire Hathaway was buying and selling
14 votes -
Novo Nordisk suggested to senior UK government officials that they could “profile” benefit claimants – those who are most likely to return to the labour market
17 votes -
TIL: The ritual of the calling of an engineer
30 votes -
Supreme Court, under pressure, issues non-binding ethics code for justices, without mechanisms for enforcement
48 votes -
My left kidney
24 votes -
What Ethical AI really means
13 votes -
The language used to describe AI risks
6 votes -
Navigating the buzzwords behind an ‘ethical’ bag of coffee
17 votes -
Tool safety
7 votes -
Professionals in Sweden are pushing back hard against a rightwing plan to make them snitch on undocumented migrants
23 votes -
Human trials of artificial wombs could start soon. Here’s what you need to know
11 votes -
How to regulate AI? Bioethicist David Magnus on medicine’s critical moment
4 votes -
For the first time in the United States, research with cephalopods might require approval by an ethics committee
21 votes -
Scientists grow whole model of human embryo, without sperm or egg
19 votes -
Chuuk Lagoon's skull problem
5 votes -
Meat eaters of Tildes - what have you tried to make use more ethical?
I'm going to start with three questions but feel free to propose your own: What if anything have you tried around finding and using more ethical sources of meat? What cooking methods and recipes...
I'm going to start with three questions but feel free to propose your own:
-
What if anything have you tried around finding and using more ethical sources of meat?
-
What cooking methods and recipes do you use that reduce the amount of meat you eat in a meal?
-
What vegetarian protein sources do you find palatable and tasty?
45 votes -
-
A single reform that could save 100,000 lives across the USA immediately
24 votes -
Failures in accuracy, ethics and responsibility with Linus Tech Tips and LMG as a whole
163 votes -
There’s far more scientific fraud than anyone wants to admit
28 votes -
Not all porn is created equal - is there such a thing as a healthy pornography?
83 votes -
Storing dead people at -196°C
44 votes -
A fact-checked debate about euthanasia
21 votes -
Apple tests ‘Apple GPT,’ develops generative AI tools to catch OpenAI
17 votes -
Google is directing searchers straight to troves of nonconsensual deep fake porn, raising legal and ethical concerns
18 votes -
Expressing dual concern in criticism for wrongdoing: The persuasive power of criticizing with care
7 votes -
US Supreme Court justices and donors mingle at campus visits. These documents show the ethical dilemmas
27 votes -
A History of Philosophy Without Any Gaps podcast: Patrick Gray on Shakespeare
6 votes -
Women in Denmark can now take a blood test to identify genetic foetal abnormalities in early pregnancy. But it has raised ethical questions.
62 votes -
How we could stumble into AI catastrophe
12 votes -
"Ethical" brands that aren't living up to their hype vs what's actually a good one?
34 votes -
As humans, can we make way more ethical and utilitarian use of technology and internet than is currently happening?
Rewind yourself back by about two decades from now when the Berners Lee basic protocols like HTTP and HTML were just being formed and the internet as we know it was just being prepared (those who...
Rewind yourself back by about two decades from now when the Berners Lee basic protocols like HTTP and HTML were just being formed and the internet as we know it was just being prepared (those who weren't born can also visualize it as enough documentation and information exists).
What a world of opportunities it was and what a promising future. It felt you could do almost anything with the help of this new technology, irrespective of your race, gender, caste, creed, religion and even social status.
The promise of the information superhighway was that an ordinary pleb will have as many opportunities as those at the top, isn't it? Do you think that promise has been fulfilled today? Do you think we have made at least decent use (if not the best possible use) of this technology?
Now, I'm not saying everything is in doom and gloom, far from it as computing power has enabled the masses to do lot's of things they could only dream of in the 1990s! Opening your smartphone in the middle of a street and having a video call with a friend was like a fantasy dream in those days (at least for the ordinary pleb).
There are many other great achievements too like cheap hardware which is light years ahead (relatively speaking), apps that let you control all aspects of your lives from finances to health to work in a matter of a few taps.
But on the other hand, we have let a few large entities thrive and create massive monopolies on these very technologies we happen to use. Efforts at open source and digital rights and freedoms took on until about late 2000s but then started fading. Today, we have those very entities which are trying to curb user's freedoms heading and/or controlling organizations like OSI, Linux Foundation, Mozilla Corp., Red Hat, etc. which are supposed to act like stewards of our digital freedoms. The situation today is very gloomy in the sense that many of the digital freedoms that our predecessors fought for are on the verge of getting lost today at the hands of surveillance capitalism and we (as collective society of humans) are responsible for it.
Can we take an oath today to make as much ethical use of technologies like internet as possible? To act in as much a manner as possible that preserves the digital rights and freedoms of the common individual or pleb in the society like you and me?
I believe that's the only progressive and better path for humanity.
36 votes -
The real reasons you shouldn’t clone your dog
14 votes -
Should we be going back and editing games for content that doesn't fit with a modern viewpoint?
Thinking about the recent incident where the devs for Skullgirls (current devs, not original devs) went and changed a bunch of artwork and other content for the fighting game, which released in...
Thinking about the recent incident where the devs for Skullgirls (current devs, not original devs) went and changed a bunch of artwork and other content for the fighting game, which released in 2012 after being Kickstarted. Aside from removing the sexualized imagery of an underage character, probably a good call, what about the other things they've decided are in 'poor taste' in 2023?
Should we be going back and editing games, or even movies, tv shows, and books to reflect more modern sensibilities? Is a game like Skullgirls even worth preserving its original content?
My opinion is no, unless it's something that is now illegal, I don't really enjoy the precedent that's been set lately where we go back and correct past mistakes in media. However, I also see the argument about removing media that may encourage racist or sexist thinking or put down minorities, but is it useful to see the media as it was and see how far we've come? Is that useful enough? Should only the original creators make that decision?
Just thought this was interesting. Tag as desired.
48 votes -
Any vegans on Tildes?
If so, how did you become vegan, why, and what has your experience been like?
50 votes -
Compassion and the moral emotions in the work of Martha Nussbaum
3 votes -
Cambridge-Caltech team of scientists claim to have created synthetic human embryos from stem cells at conference; work not yet published
29 votes -
Peter Singer - Ordinary people are evil
8 votes -
The curious side effects of medical transparency
10 votes -
Norway's $1.4tn wealth fund calls for state regulation of AI – Nicolai Tangen says fund will set guidelines for companies it invests in on ethical use of AI
4 votes -
US Supreme Court on ethics issues: Not broken, no fix needed
17 votes -
Seeing more whole
1 vote -
The rich have their own ethics: Effective altruism and the crypto crash
11 votes -
Navigating the ethics of ancient human DNA research
1 vote -
Help me understand how I feel about a particular style of watch
There's a type of watch that's very popular. It has a clean, clear, design. It's definitely a classic. I have mixed feelings about it because of the origins of the design. The watch is big. I has...
There's a type of watch that's very popular. It has a clean, clear, design. It's definitely a classic. I have mixed feelings about it because of the origins of the design.
The watch is big. I has a black dial with white numbers and index marks. At the 12 o'clock position there's a triangle. There's plenty of lume on the dial. They usually have a leather strap, and that strap often has two rivets.
Sometimes the dial has two index rings, the inner ring has hour markings and the outer ring has minute markings.
IWC makes the most well known example: https://www.iwc.com/en/watch-collections/pilot-watches/iw329301-big-pilots-watch-43.html
There are lots of homages:
https://www.watchshop.com/watches/mens-sekonda-aviator-watch-3347.pdp
https://mwcwatches.com/products/vintage-ww2-style-german-pilots-watch-1
This style of watch is called "B Uhr", or "B Uhren"and you get many results if you use that search term. It's German, and it's an abbreviation for "Beobachtungs-uhren" which means "observation watch".
My problem with the watch is that is that it was specifically designed for the Luftwaffe in WW2.
https://monochrome-watches.com/the-history-of-the-pilot-watch-part-five-b-uhr/
After the war other airforces, including the British RAF, started using very similar watches.
Most watch sellers do not celebrate the Nazi history of the watch. But some do: https://b-uhr.com/en/collection/b-uhr-luftwaffe-flieger-chronograph.html
So, I don't know how I feel about this watch. Can its clean design be appreciated when I know of its Nazi link? Can I separate the creator from the product?
8 votes -
10,000 brains in a basement: The dark and mysterious origins of Denmark’s psychiatric brain collection
6 votes -
10,000 brains in a basement – the dark and mysterious origins of Denmark's psychiatric brain collection
8 votes -
If you die in the game, you die in real life
10 votes -
What's so wrong about sexbots?
11 votes -
r/Onlyfans101 mods are currently manipulating tons of NSFW subreddits
16 votes