-
7 votes
-
Money Stuff: FTX might have found some money
6 votes -
Sam Bankman-Fried was reckless from the start and SEC settlements are more generous in September
11 votes -
Without a college degree, life in America is staggeringly shorter
21 votes -
Real men share the housework: what Britain can learn from the domestic bliss of Scandinavia
31 votes -
What’s in your go bag for the apocalypse?
27 votes -
Dear drivers, steady as you go at 20mph. And welcome to the future.
35 votes -
How to argue against identity politics without turning into a reactionary
68 votes -
Europe’s rightward drift is not set in stone: our new research should give hope to the left
12 votes -
US food banks face increased demand - are about to lose funding source
12 votes -
Respect laws of nature by moving to a circular economy
9 votes -
Europe talks to itself in many languages. That’s why English is vital to its democracy
17 votes -
Opinion by Brian Merchant: I’ve always loved tech. Now, I’m a Luddite. You should be one, too.
69 votes -
We need cheap protein — but it doesn’t have to be meat
16 votes -
Opinion: Why a Navajo leader’s federal conviction gives US prosecutors a road map to take on former president Donald Trump
15 votes -
And then Elon Musk said there’ll be no more war – not via his satellite. Aren’t we lucky to have the world in his hands?
69 votes -
Change will come to Russia — abruptly and unexpectedly
23 votes -
Local governments aren't businesses – so why are they force-fed business software?
31 votes -
Trigger warning: Faced with professional discipline and a requirement to take training to keep his psychology license in Canada - Jordan Peterson shares his beliefs re trans people
21 votes -
Opinion: The Kids Online Safety Act would harm LGBTQ+ youth, restrict access to information and community
38 votes -
Ozempic cuts alcohol cravings. Liquor companies aren’t ready.
30 votes -
Cats with bird flu? The threat grows.
16 votes -
The Ezra Klein Show: Interview with Jennifer Pahlka about where government policy implementation goes wrong (and why government doesn't always work well)
7 votes -
Three big, bold ideas to douse the flames of a world on fire
10 votes -
The unwanted Spanish soccer kiss is textbook male chauvinism. Don’t excuse it.
34 votes -
What happened to Washington, DC food trucks?
15 votes -
The GDP gap between Europe and the United States is now 80%
37 votes -
Norway has a chance to transform climate finance – the country's windfall from the energy crisis should be used to underwrite investments in developing countries
17 votes -
In Alabama, white tide rushes on
10 votes -
BRICS expansion is no triumph for China
14 votes -
Opinion - Antonin Scalia was wrong about the meaning of ‘bear arms’
33 votes -
David Brooks: Nikki Haley is the best Donald Trump alternative
16 votes -
Apostate Muslims - this is why we protest the Quran
Here's the article in Danish First of all, I hope it's ok to post links to sites that aren't in English because this is a really good opinion piece. For context, there has been a lot of news about...
First of all, I hope it's ok to post links to sites that aren't in English because this is a really good opinion piece.
For context, there has been a lot of news about activists burning the Quran in Sweden and Denmark - Turkey has withheld Sweden's Nato bid because of it, and Russia has been accused of influencing events in order to attempt to destabilize western countries. So it's a whole thing.
I translated the article through DeepL and did some small edits and added occasional context in [brackets]:
Apostate Muslims - this is why we protest the Quran
It is an insult to apostate Muslims if the government gives in and criminalises the burning or desecrating of the Quran - we have fought to free ourselves from the Quran, now you want to protect the perpetrator.
I'm an apostate - ex-Muslim. It's hard to get there. Doing away with Islam can have completely incalculable consequences. And if the government gives in to the Islamic countries that want to restrict freedom of speech in Denmark with threats of violence and economic pressure, it will be much harder to break free from Islam and live a free life in the future.
Because it's not just about Quran burnings or Rasmus Paludan [very controversial far-right activist who has done Quran burnings in Denmark and Sweden many times]. It's about criticising Islam, which will not be tolerated. To signal this to the Islamic countries - that they should focus on legislation in their own countries - The Association of Apostates is therefore protesting on 22 August in front of the Turkish embassy in Copenhagen.
But it is just as much a signal to the Danish government.
The Association of Apostates is Denmark's first organisation for ex-Muslims, and we know how difficult it is to come to terms with Islam - because we have done it ourselves. But if criticism or mockery of Islam is criminalised as it is in Islamic countries, the apostasy process becomes even more difficult, because you also have the law against you.
A conformist who defends their abuser
Many Muslim apostates lead double lives: Outwardly, they live by Islamic rules. Some go to the mosque, pray and fast because it is expected and because they have to keep up appearances even though they have lost their faith. This is due to a fear of the incalculable consequences that an apostasy from Islam can have for the individual person.
It is not Allah's punishment that is feared, but rather the traumatic consequences of societal pressure or ostracisation. As a result, many often end up complying with Islamic traditions and expectations from family and friends.
This can range from marriage, which must be to a Muslim, to the circumcision of male children. To survive in this situation, many choose self-deception, trying to fit in with the group by denying reality and defending Islam, despite feeling no connection to the religion.
People who have been victims of domestic violence often describe that after the breakup, they find it difficult to let go of their partner. Apostate Muslims also experience this dependency. You end up as a conformist who defends your abuser. You keep the label of 'Muslim' because it is far more unsafe and full of conflict to call yourself an apostate.
The law is a slippery slope
In many of the Muslim countries that will now dictate legislation in Denmark, there is death penalty and imprisonment for apostasy and blasphemy. Gay rights are violated and women are treated as second-class citizens. As ex-Muslims, we see how Islamic dogmas and traditions are gaining more and more influence in Denmark.
Hijab, which represents discrimination and inequality between men and women, is promoted as the norm. But the reality is that for ex-Muslim women in Denmark, removing the hijab often has serious consequences.
The month of Ramadan is promoted in the same way as Christmas, even though for many ex-Muslims, Ramadan is a month where social control is heightened because Ramadan is about getting closer to Allah - a god you don't believe in.
If the government yields in regards to blasphemy or desecration of the Quran, it's just another step down that slippery slope. A slippery slope where ex-Muslims live under social control or in exclusion.
But fortunately, we live in a free country like Denmark, where there is room for critical thinking and where you have the right to believe what you do and do not believe. Where you have the right to draw what you want [reference to drawings of the Prophet that caused an international incident in the 2000s] and, in protest, burn, shred or make paper aeroplanes out of a book whose content you find repulsive or disagree with. Like when Poul Nyrup demonstratively tore the pages out of Fogh's book back in 2001. [Nyrup is a Social Democrat and debated Fogh of Venstre, a right-wing party, on TV during the election campaign]
Protect the victim, not the Quran
At The Association of Apostates, some of our members say that one of the things that bothers them about Islam is that Islam calls itself the religion of peace, but at the same time believes that you should receive 100 lashes if you have sex before marriage. Here, the members refer to the Quran's Sura 24:2 which reads: "As for female and male fornicators, give each of them one hundred lashes, and do not let pity for them make you lenient in enforcing the law of Allah, if you truly believe in Allah and the Last Day. And let a number of believers witness their punishment."
Should a woman who is critical of this content of the Quran also be punished by the government if she tore out the pages of the Quran in protest? Or burned it? If the woman had been subjected to the act prescribed by the Quran, should she just keep quiet and respect the holy scriptures?
I certainly don't think so. But that's what's being suggested in the government's proposal. [They want to ban burnings of the Quran in places like in front of embassies]
60 votes -
Eliminate elections for a better US democracy
25 votes -
A single reform that could save 100,000 lives across the USA immediately
24 votes -
It's not just male influencers who preach problematic manipulation
21 votes -
It’s time to accept save scumming as the best way to play RPGs
48 votes -
President of Niger: My country is under attack and I’ve been taken hostage
91 votes -
Want employees to return to the office? Then give each one an office.
116 votes -
There’s far more scientific fraud than anyone wants to admit
28 votes -
Why haven’t we made it safer to breathe in US classrooms?
9 votes -
Ken is a bell hooks critique come to life in ‘Barbie’
31 votes -
Why do so many Scots cling to a false affinity with Norway?
10 votes -
Former US President Donald Trump will find that Special Counsel Jack Smith has dealt with the likes of him—and worse—before
35 votes -
Inside American Starbucks' dirty war against organized labor
23 votes -
America's love of sanctions will be its downfall
12 votes -
Just give kids school lunch
34 votes -
There was much more to bohemian actress Jane Birkin than the Hermes Birkin bag
4 votes -
Threads is the perfect Twitter alternative, just not for you
59 votes -
American theater is imploding before our eyes
39 votes