-
6 votes
-
Experimental real property tax basis-set rate based on usable area per person
Random thought. What if we taxed property based on the area per person of the property, as opposed to sale value? Edit and quick intro to those who mostly rent: most real property in the US,...
Random thought. What if we taxed property based on the area per person of the property, as opposed to sale value?
Edit and quick intro to those who mostly rent: most real property in the US, especially residential property, is taxed yearly based on some variation of something called "fair market value," usually assessed by a local tax assessor's office
I'm proposing that a property would be taxed for every square meter of space per person in the designated property unit. It can't be totally simplified, but should be fairly straightforward. There could also be progressive brackets. It might not make make sense to apply it strictly per person, but rather for a typical use. That is, we would assume "single family residential" properties to house 3.4 (totally made up number) people per house and property.
The goal of this is to find a fair, market-driven incentive to build density into urban cores.
A similar approach could be applied to commercial space (but probably not industrial).
It could be coupled with a sales tax (currently missing in most real property tax regimes, at least in the US) to capture runaway property valuations in certain jurisdictions.
Alternatively, we could drop the property value based tax rate (but not eliminate it), and then add a per person-area surcharge.
It's not meant to increase revenue, although it could certainly be used that way. It could also be use to decrease revenue, and maybe that would be a good way to sell it. But at the end of the day, developers and residents would both have an incentive to pursue as dense development as possible, even if there is not a density driving pressure of desirablity, which only exists in a few really cool urban cores.
8 votes -
Texas' skyscrapers are going dark to keep billions of birds safe
13 votes -
Why we can’t build better cities (ft. Not Just Bikes)
13 votes -
Detroit’s LGBTQ+ Chamber of Commerce is helping create a business renaissance
10 votes -
Not your grandma’s granny flat: How San Diego hacked state housing law to build ADU ‘apartment buildings’
16 votes -
Joe Biden administration offers $35 billion in low-interest loans to support US transit-oriented development
24 votes -
Who gets peace and quiet?: The dangers of urban noise
23 votes -
Atlanta’s ‘Cop City’ neighbors have no voting rights to stop it
19 votes -
Can NYC ease housing costs with ‘City of Yes’ proposal?
14 votes -
Thoughts on creating a positive ~urbanism group
This would be a great positive mindset gathering place for folks who want to have more productive and less alienating discussions than what fuckcars etc provided. The urbanism movement talks about...
This would be a great positive mindset gathering place for folks who want to have more productive and less alienating discussions than what fuckcars etc provided.
The urbanism movement talks about solutions and work being done at the larger governmental scale, down to the local "tactical" or grassroots scale. These ideas are how to work to improve the housing affordability crisis, pedestrian safety, and generally help make more people friendly municipalities & communities that can become financially more sustainable. There is overlap with permaculture and environmentalism.If you're unfamiliar with this movement, some great places to start are books by Jane Jacobs, Strong Towns by Charles L Marohn, Bowling Alone, by Robert D. Putnam, and countless YouTube channels like Not Just Bikes, Oh the Urbanity and many others.
15 votes -
Ending minimum parking requirements was a policy win for the Twin Cities
16 votes -
Tech billionaires launch California ‘utopia’ website
55 votes -
Can infill development save cities?
6 votes -
The historic Gullah-Geechee community is fighting to retain its land and culture in South Carolina
24 votes -
If we want a shift to walking, we need to prioritize dignity
103 votes -
New York City announces major public space and transit improvements for Downtown Brooklyn
17 votes -
Who really wants megastructure cites?
3 votes -
Cities aren't loud: Cars are loud
10 votes -
Why we won’t raise our kids in suburbia
11 votes -
The end of "The End of San Francisco"
9 votes -
Life imitates Hollywood: The rise of "movie-set urbanism"
7 votes -
Castle in the clouds: Celebrating the eclectic, DIY designs of Ukraine's status symbol balconies
6 votes -
Paris will create the city's largest gardens around the Eiffel Tower
9 votes -
The curious tale of the St. Louis street barriers
5 votes -
A highway runs through it: Inside the push to tear down an Oakland freeway
6 votes -
Mini Stories: Volume 6
3 votes -
The social ideology of the motorcar
6 votes -
Why did America give up on mass transit? (Don't blame cars).
12 votes -
"The Social Ideology of the Motorcar" by André Gorz, 1973
4 votes