-
13 votes
-
Google responds to EU by adding a fee to Play Services
18 votes -
Tucker Carlson says he can't go to restaurants anymore
12 votes -
What is the worst food experience you've ever had?
Also, what is the best?
11 votes -
How do you view your participation on the Internet?
It’s no secret that the Internet has significantly changed even from just a decade ago. I’ve been thinking about online communities - particularly forums - and I’ve really begun to miss the sense...
It’s no secret that the Internet has significantly changed even from just a decade ago. I’ve been thinking about online communities - particularly forums - and I’ve really begun to miss the sense of discovery when finding a new one while browsing online. It was like lifting a rock and finding an entirely new collective of people writing to one another about anything (complete with graphic signatures). It was an internet subculture in progress. Something something Wild West.
Small forums like that did a number of things that I feel we haven’t been able to replicate. You got to know people over time. It wasn’t a feed you vaguely subscribed to, but a forum (in literal definition of the word) that you chose to participate in.
I often think about what probably defines a typical experience online for people these days and I feel that the smaller and more cozy feeling of actual community has been replaced by the digital equivalent of big box stores. Twitter, Youtube, Facebook, Twitch, Netflix. Big corporate places with portals and algorithms.
These aren’t necessarily bad things in and of themselves (aside from the chasing of a world in which nothing is left unplanned), but I’m trying to hone in on the idea that the sheer randomness of this medium has more or less vaporized. The concept that anything and everything you do on the Internet wasn’t aggressively being tracked and developed into digital profiles to be traded, used, shared, and sold by ad companies and an array of other organizations was a fart in the wind compared to what it’s like online today. Websites simply didn’t have 5 megabytes+ of Javascript whereas now you need a half a dozen browser extensions to make the internet a halfway decent thing to be on.
My hunch is that once upon a time, people (at least those that even had access to it) had a kind of amateur desire of wanting to create an account at a website (particularly a forum). Coming up on 2019, I think long and hard before creating another account anywhere. There even was an expectation to introduce yourself in some introduction subforum at many of these boards.
A theme that has become completely domineering is the inflated ego linked to tribalism. I see people being so serious about everything; there can be no reciprocal discussion about anything.
I think it’s probably trivial to dismiss this as nostalgia but I feel there are some real truths to this. The Internet is something you had the choice of actually logging off and disconnecting but today, everyone is constantly connected. We are in the age of distraction and preoccupation. Think about it: how many times have you picked up your (smart)phone purely out of reflex, not even to check something with purpose? You see it everywhere in public, certainly. The constant stream of brightly colored iconography, beeps, alerts, buzzing, push/notifications, and beyond are endless. Everything demands your attention, and it is never enough.
53 votes -
The tragedy of this American moment: Populism, elites, and the 2020 election | Anand Giridharadas
6 votes -
The new American dream home is one you never have to leave
9 votes -
The Beauty of Programming
14 votes -
why i only own 4 books 💸 a chat on booktube consumerism
12 votes -
A personal library too big to get through in a lifetime “isn’t a sign of failure or ignorance,” but rather “a badge of honor.”
11 votes -
How a subprime auto lender consumed Detroit with debt and turned its courthouse into a collections agency
7 votes -
Big Bird puppeteer Caroll Spinney is retiring from "Sesame Street" after nearly fifty years
9 votes -
A man's love of squirrel meat might have given him a horrifying, fatal brain disease
9 votes -
Is there any objective value of having your biologically own kids?
Imagine if you are married and want to have kids, and you have a friend who clearly has better looks and/or health than you or your spouse. Would you like to ask them to provide egg cell or sperm?...
Imagine if you are married and want to have kids, and you have a friend who clearly has better looks and/or health than you or your spouse. Would you like to ask them to provide egg cell or sperm? Why not?
What's the value of true lineage for humans who can select using human mind, not only being led by instinct? Is selfishness the only reason to have your own biological kids or there's something else?
23 votes -
'For the Pacific it's always about cash': Australian Environment Minister in diplomatic incident over climate change
3 votes -
Teen rides around the world in record attempt until someone in Townsville steals his bike
9 votes -
Archaeologists have just unearthed an inscription in Pompeii that suggests the Ancient Roman city might have been destroyed a full two months later than previously thought
10 votes -
A senior Australian doctor offering medical care to refugees on Nauru was detained by police yesterday and deported from the island this afternoon
7 votes -
Planned Star Trek TV shows will differ in style, with breaks in between to avoid burnout
6 votes -
Canada becomes second country to legalise recreational marijuana
25 votes -
When Asian women are harassed for marrying non-Asian men
20 votes -
Conquering the high concept
4 votes -
The bang on the head that knocked English out of me
14 votes -
The man who dodged the Dogecoin
10 votes -
By the light of the Moon: Turing recreates scene of iconic lunar landing
4 votes -
An extremely detailed map of the 2016 election
12 votes -
A genocide incited on Facebook, with posts from Myanmar’s military
8 votes -
The Kansas City Chiefs’ defense is worse than their offense is great
6 votes -
Right-wing group Patriot Prayer was camped on rooftop with weapons ahead of major Portland rally
27 votes -
As Trump Demonizes Immigrants, These US Farmers Aren't Having it
10 votes -
Make threads Kindle / print friendly
I wished to set aside some threads to read on my Kindle. I use the Kindle Chrome extension for that, but on Tildes it only captures the main topic, not the comments. I tried saving the page...
I wished to set aside some threads to read on my Kindle. I use the Kindle Chrome extension for that, but on Tildes it only captures the main topic, not the comments. I tried saving the page locally but the Kindle app still didn't work. My only option on Chrome seems to be printing to PDF, but that's a subpar solution. I was able to convert the offline page to mobi using Calibre, though, but this is not very practical and the result was not that good.
maybe I should have written conversion friendly, because printing to paper/PDF is working fine
12 votes -
MongoDB switches its open-source license from AGPLv3 to the newly created "Server Side Public License"
10 votes -
Comparison between several messenger systems
9 votes -
Greece's geography problem
9 votes -
Devoted fans pay thousands for this fermented tea, whose decades-old vintages are treated like wine
13 votes -
Discord - all users now have access to the store beta and new Nitro subscription options
15 votes -
Study of Puerto Rico rainforest shows massive, climate-driven decline in population of insects and insect-eating animals
9 votes -
It is truly shocking how much sugar we eat
Have you ever really looked at what you eat? If you have, you may notice one common ingredient present in everything from vegan sauces to certain ketogenic foods. Taking those specific diets into...
Have you ever really looked at what you eat? If you have, you may notice one common ingredient present in everything from vegan sauces to certain ketogenic foods. Taking those specific diets into consideration, the widely accepted figure for keto is <100 grams, and similar in the vegan sphere as well(Often times you'll see a quoted 30 grams, but the kicker always comes in the comments where someone says fruit based sugars don't count towards this. They do, very much so, count towards it). This is far, far, far too much sugar for any one human to be taking in a day. The FDA has no recommended figure for their DV scale of food labels, but other groups certainly do. The World Health Organisation recommends no more than 5% of daily calories be from sugar of all types. This is equivalent to 25 grams for a 2000 calorie diet. The American Heart Association recommends the same figures.
Now, you may be asking yourself, why would the AHA bother themselves with sugar? Certainly that's more for a diabetes association to study than a heart disease one? Well, it's because sugar is heavily linked to heart disease. From the source:
participants who took in 25% or more of their daily calories as sugar were more than twice as likely to die from heart disease as those whose diets included less than 10% added sugar
So, not only are you at risk for heart disease, but there are new studies that suggest alzheimer's is nothing more than a 3rd form of diabetes.
I'm not hoping for much in posting this, except that someone somewhere looks at their diet and resists the stranglehold sugar has on our present society.
35 votes -
Ten books that defined the 1910s
10 votes -
Platform for discussion not centred around the sharing of links
deleted
16 votes -
China Miéville
deleted
10 votes -
American mercenaries were hired to assassinate politicians in the Middle East
14 votes -
The internet apologizes …Even those who designed our digital world are aghast at what they created. A breakdown of what went wrong — from the architects who built it.
32 votes -
One healthy diversity data point: research reports an uptick in women applying for IT jobs
4 votes -
Premier of Québec, François Legault, says crucifix 'not religious symbol'
11 votes -
Toronto police allowed to take part in 2019 Pride parade, organizers say
7 votes -
The hidden air pollution inside your workplace
7 votes -
China breaks silence on Muslim detention camps, calling them ‘humane’
9 votes -
Why US President Donald Trump should give a million dollars to Elizabeth Warren's favorite charity
3 votes -
The man who broke US politics: Newt Gingrich turned partisan battles into bloodsport, wrecked Congress, and paved the way for Donald Trump's rise. Now he's reveling in his achievements.
16 votes