-
53 votes
-
Roku launching Howdy, a $3/month Ad-Free subscription service
11 votes -
Edgy commercial for "MF Wind Farms!"
11 votes -
The history of SPAM
19 votes -
Why US anti-trans campaigns keep returning to the politics of meat
21 votes -
That white guy who can't get a job at Tim Hortons? He's AI.
22 votes -
Studios decry cinemas’ ad-filled preshows as AMC warns of “25-30 extra minutes”: Here are the consequences for movie biz
35 votes -
Novo Nordisk's ad campaign, which aimed to speak ‘without filters’ by declaring obesity a disease, has faced strong criticism on social media and from some scientific societies
21 votes -
Brazil is set to become No. 3 global Free Ad-supported Streaming Television market
9 votes -
YouTube’s new ads will ruin the best part of a video on purpose
60 votes -
Mark Zuckerberg statement suggests that Meta could create ads for businesses directly, eliminating role of ad agencies
25 votes -
Roku says its ads aren’t meant to be ‘interruptive’ after controversial test
33 votes -
Your phone doesn't listen to you but apps send screenshots home
44 votes -
Don’t buy stuff from old AI people
20 votes -
China bans 'smart' and 'autonomous' driving terms from vehicle ads
41 votes -
Eight of the top ten online shows are spreading climate misinformation
33 votes -
What if we made advertising illegal?
90 votes -
Swedish fashion retailer H&M will use AI doppelgangers in some social media posts and marketing in the place of humans, if given permission by models
10 votes -
YouTube Premium Lite: Ad-free viewing for $7.99/month
39 votes -
Enough with the bullshit (a letter to fellow bullshit sufferers)
56 votes -
Google claims news is worthless to its ad business after test involving 1% of search results in eight EU markets
23 votes -
A history of the San Francisco bouncy ball TV ad
12 votes -
Google may be close to launching YouTube Premium Lite
25 votes -
Stellantis introduces pop-up ads in vehicles, sparking outrage among owners
67 votes -
In Vermont personal ads for relationships are still going strong
14 votes -
Google’s ad policy changes to allow device fingerprinting
50 votes -
Is it just me or has advertising lost the plot entirely?
If you know me you probably know I hate advertising with a passion. I have blocked ads on my computer but I have limited control on my TV and phone when it comes to YouTube advertisements. And the...
If you know me you probably know I hate advertising with a passion. I have blocked ads on my computer but I have limited control on my TV and phone when it comes to YouTube advertisements. And the other day I got this incredibly bizarre ad.
I only speak the tiny amount of Spanish I have learned through osmosis, but the phrase they are using is essentially “we’ll eat at home.” The scenario is a familiar one; you’ve got a kid in the car out in town and they see a restaurant they want to go and they ask if they can stop to eat. The parent says no, we’ll eat at home, because there are a lot of reasons why it’s better for them. Home cooked meals are cheaper. They can be higher quality, both in terms of taste and nutrition. They might have food that will go bad soon and so they want to go and eat it first. They don’t want to normalize eating rich unhealthy foods for their kids.
But this isn’t an ad for groceries or processed food products. This is an ad for DoorDash. A food delivery app. Literally none of the reasons you would want to eat at home apply here. Actually, using DoorDash in this particular situation is dramatically worse, because you are paying more money to get food you could have just picked up on the way only to get a worse version of it because it is no longer freshly prepared and is likely cold.
I just can’t get over this because it’s so incredibly out of touch with reality. Many people have had to have signed off on this for me to see this ad. What were they thinking? Are they so out of touch with reality that they think this is something that people do? The fact that this is clearly targeting Hispanic Americans makes it even worse. I live in Southern California and about a third of the people I know are Hispanic and all of them would laugh at this. I can’t help but wonder if the teams working on them were full of privileged white guys who are saying “yeah, this is what Mexicans are really like” or if there are also rich Hispanics on board who thinks this is something that people really do.
But this is just the most egregious example of out of touch advertising. YouTube ads are supposed to be targeted right? But why do I get ads for CRM, ERP, and accounting products when I don’t own a business? Why do I get ads in languages I don’t speak? Why is it that I can report and tell Google that an advertiser is inappropriate or against their terms and still they will show me the ads again?
And beyond that I am astonished at how many ads I see that exist to mislead you. Almost every time you see something compared or tested there is somthing they aren’t telling you. The most obvious example is Scott toilet paper; they advertise that they have rolls that are significantly longer than their leading competition. But what they neglect to tell you is that their product is single-ply while their competitors are double- or triple-ply. They actually have a very comfortable amount of toilet paper on each roll. Weirdly, all toilet paper is misleading though; what is a “mega roll”, how does it differ from an “ultra roll”, and why is one roll of it somehow equivalent to six of some unspecified other type of roll? In the meanwhile Old Spice is trying to take advantage of balding men like me by telling me that their shampoo increases the volume of hair by however many percent while there is fine print at the bottom saying that it is compared to unwashed hair, meaning their shampoo probably doesn’t do anything the cheapest generic product at the dollar store won’t.
I know this is basically just a rant, but I can’t be the only one who notices this stuff, am I?
54 votes -
A robot dog advertising a darknet store seized by police in Moscow
22 votes -
What's worse than ads and AI? Ads in your AI, so Google is testing it.
30 votes -
Mel Manuel, trans candidate for US House, injected testosterone on camera in a campaign ad
18 votes -
Pokémon FAST (free ad-supported television) channel launches on Pluto TV — US for now, to be followed by Canada, UK, Australia, New Zealand
5 votes -
Florida threatens TV executive with jail time for airing ad in support of abortion rights
35 votes -
Your chatbot transcripts may be a gold mine for AI companies
25 votes -
Paypal opted you into sharing data without your knowledge
90 votes -
Free Live Sports now offering free ad supported sports programming worldwide
10 votes -
uBlock Origin Lite maker ends Firefox store support, slams Mozilla for hostile reviews
44 votes -
Icelandic-Danish artist Olafur Eliasson is set to take over some of the world's biggest public spaces in his most impressive installation piece yet
5 votes -
Ford seeks patent for tech that listens to driver conversations to serve ads
58 votes -
US Department of Justice attorneys claim Google has “trifecta of monopolies” on day one of ad tech trial
30 votes -
In leak, Facebook partner brags about listening to your phone’s microphone to serve ads for stuff you mention
48 votes -
Elon Musk’s lawyers quietly subpoena public interest groups
38 votes -
Sweden and Denmark will summon tech companies over ads on their platforms that are posted by gangs to recruit young Swedes to commit violent crimes in the Nordics
17 votes -
PinkNews CEO recorded calling trans issues "contentious" on the basis it jeopardises ad revenue
38 votes -
How the rise of the camera launched a fight to protect Gilded Age Americans’ privacy
13 votes -
US Federal Trade Commission bans fake online reviews, inflated social media influence; rule takes effect in October
52 votes -
Google and Meta struck secret ads deal to target teenagers
61 votes -
YouTube without a working ad blocker
I liked ( past tense ) watching YouTube with the latest Firefox on my Mint Linux box. No more. The ad blocker I use ( latest version ) has stopped working for removing YouTube commercials. The...
I liked ( past tense ) watching YouTube with the latest Firefox on my Mint Linux box.
No more.
The ad blocker I use ( latest version ) has stopped working for removing YouTube commercials.
The commercials are obnoxious.
I think I will quit until the ad blocker I use updates again with a fix.
Sorry YouTube, you are far from being worth $14.00 USD a month.
Edit:
Mint Linux 21.2
Cinnamon 5.8
Firefox 128.0.3
Ublock Origin 1.59.0
- I completely removed UBlock Origin
- I completely emptied my Firefox cache and other data
- I signed out of Google completely
- I reinstalled UBlock Origin
- I signed back into Google
- I tried using YouTube with my VPN turned on.
No joy.
I can watch YouTube ad free via a private window in Firefox.
I can watch YouTube ad free if I log out of my Google/YouTube account
My add blocker works in other browsers when I am not logged into my Google/YouTube account.
49 votes -
Google Chrome warns uBlock Origin may soon be disabled
82 votes -
Making radio pay: Toll broadcasting and the first ad on the airwaves
6 votes -
The truly disturbing story of Kellogg's Corn Flakes
34 votes