-
14 votes
-
Sean Strickland suggests he’s ready to leave UFC to fight Jake Paul amid pay dispute
5 votes -
Why do we find Tildes (and Lobsters) more interesting than the alternatives?
I frame this in the affirmative because we would not be here if we did not agree. I have only been engaging actively with Lobsters and Tildes recently but find it more enjoyable than Lemmy,...
I frame this in the affirmative because we would not be here if we did not agree. I have only been engaging actively with Lobsters and Tildes recently but find it more enjoyable than Lemmy, Piefed, Mastodon, etc.. Why is that? I believe the fediverse is a cringe circle-jerk of Linux and echo-chamber liberal-not-leftists. Lobsters has the same tech-leaning of the fediverse but it is much more interesting and technical. What then makes Tildes more interesting? Quality or lack of fediverse cringe?
Curious what you all think?
Since getting into Reddit since 2014 or so, that is been my main source of forum activity. Since Reddit proved to not be a good site, I have tried to find alternatives.
Edit: I think Tildes best feature I have recently enjoyed is that the feed is based on activity which can include super old posts that have a new discussion. I like that this allows me to see what is being discussed now while also limiting discussions to one post. This is much nicer than having to search through tons of threads of the same topic.
51 votes -
Was watching a history YouTube video when I realized they are all AI
Ink Explainer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49_Ph2q6uIM Genius History: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHCamT4zfH4 It is the exact same AI voice. How sad.
28 votes -
Are others finding themselves spending less and less time online?
Recently, I have found myself almost unable to find things online to engage with, Tildes being the rare exception. I feel like I used to be able to find my way down Youtube rabbit holes, scroll on...
Recently, I have found myself almost unable to find things online to engage with, Tildes being the rare exception. I feel like I used to be able to find my way down Youtube rabbit holes, scroll on Reddit endlessly, and for a period even get lost on Instagram reels. I still have the urges, but now when I indulge it doesn't feel like an effortless dopamine hit, I feel like I'm fighting the platforms for something, anything engaging.
The channels I enjoyed, even the small ones, seem to all be chasing monetization and the lowest common denominator. Even Beau Miles, one of my favorite people on earth, joined the absolute deluge of people focusing on renovating a crumbling "historic" building or just rehashing his old fun ideas. Gone are the days of the inspired videos like the Human Bean. The miniature painters all seem to be hocking their own inventions or models. It feels like capitalism has crept into every video. Reddit is even worse, where it always feels like there is an agenda or a link to a patreon or scrappy youtube channel and I just feel manipulated by the posts being made.
For lack of a better phrase, I'm just constantly feeling the "ick" being online. I'm actively trying to search out things to engage with, anything even remotely genuine or authentic, and running up against a wall. It just feels bizarre. Maybe I'm alone on this. Or maybe I'm reaching a different stage of life and no longer the target demographic. In any case I just feel myself reaching for my laptop less and less and less. For most folks I think that would be a good thing, but when it's dark out, and I'm too burnt out from work to make progress on whatever home or art project I'm doing it was a really nice way to turn off my brain.
Is anyone else having a similar experience? Are folks happy with this version of online content? Are we entering the dead internet? I'm trying to figure out if this is a real trend or just a personal experience.
74 votes -
Do you know the effects of using clickbait to combat misinformation?
9 votes -
"What do we do with Jacob Geller?" (Self admitted sexual assault, removed from Nebula streaming)
56 votes -
Irreverent ads make me want to buy things even less
Lately on YouTube I’ve been getting a few really weird ads. The first was a 5 second spot video for Fatty brand meat sticks. They say “vegans look away” as they spin on the screen. I’m...
Lately on YouTube I’ve been getting a few really weird ads.
The first was a 5 second spot video for Fatty brand meat sticks. They say “vegans look away” as they spin on the screen.
I’m plant-based: I don’t eat animal products 99.9% of the time. And well before I was like this I wouldn’t have eaten their product because meat sticks were just simply gross. But literally every time I see an advertisement for a food product I see something that looks more like actual meat on the screen so when I see the ad in question, it is basically the single most flaccid insult I have ever seen.
I wouldn’t even be bringing it up except for today I had a different ad show up from dbrand, this time as an image as I was looking through the recommended videos. It was a screenshot of a conversation between them and peta over some leather something or other.
I just think about what this kind of advertising is supposed to do. It’s supposed to position the product in a persons mind. It says to them “buy this to stick it to those leftist vegan cucks” while still being soft enough that a leftist vegan cuck might not be bothered by it and might still consider buying it.
But I think there is a different message we should take from these ads: these companies are run by assholes. The fact that leather and meat require animals to die is a morbid fact that our society has accepted, and rubbing that into the faces of those who disagree with it is not a good look; it just reveals them as the children that they are.
While my dietary restrictions may have prevented me from buying anything from Fatty, the only thing stopping me from buying from dbrand is their own idiotic marketing. Why on earth did they think that they think that their trolling would be effective advertising outside of the trolling website?
50 votes -
Online visual art communities without AI?
Hi Tildeans, I am not an artist, but I know artists who are searching for online spaces where they can post / share / engage with artwork without the AI generated art being ever-present. I’m...
Hi Tildeans,
I am not an artist, but I know artists who are searching for online spaces where they can post / share / engage with artwork without the AI generated art being ever-present.
I’m wondering if anyone on Tildes is aware of platforms in the small web that are trying to accomplish this? I’m specifically looking for smaller platforms, since I think Tildes does a good job creating an online community where it feels like I’m engaging with real people. I appreciate anyone who has any suggestions!
16 votes -
How to rage bait Americans
12 votes -
I'm not sure disinfo campaigns on X still work
15 votes -
YouTuber RedLogic built a custom Minecraft simulation to see if the game could ever beat itself without a player ever joining – the simulation took 1.97 billion years, but it did complete
21 votes -
A college girl was exploited on camera. A network of anonymous men got to work.
38 votes -
X corp is taking down Nitter instances and demands takedown of project repository
67 votes -
Deepfake crisis spreads across Finnish schools, workplaces and military – law does not prevent the creating of such material
19 votes -
Update: Matt Mullenweg tells Automattic staff in Slack he’s back in control after CEO ouster
16 votes -
Automattic CEO Matt Mullenweg put on 'leave of absence'
50 votes -
Operation Bluebird launches Tweet.app
39 votes -
I built a virtual pet that dies when you doomscroll
21 votes -
The tragedy of Perez Hilton
11 votes -
Gamergate but actually
30 votes -
Meta agrees to heavy restrictions on teen users in major US lawsuit settlement
36 votes -
Good Good Golf pulls video after criticism that it depicts violence against women
11 votes -
Reddit will require you to be logged in to use old.reddit.com
122 votes -
Tech (or political?) choices
4 votes -
Artists built a site to escape AI. Scrapers are coming for it anyway.
30 votes -
Replicating Reddit's best feature on other forums
41 votes -
Postmortem retrospective on "redditp", the Reddit slideshow website ~15 minute read
22 votes -
Invite request spam problem - vet through other social media?
For most of the history of Tildes, if someone came across the site and decided they wanted to join, but didn't know anyone already on, they could email Deimos with an invite request. However, with...
For most of the history of Tildes, if someone came across the site and decided they wanted to join, but didn't know anyone already on, they could email Deimos with an invite request. However, with the rise of LLMs, the noise-to-signal ratio has become so high this is no longer a way to join Tildes - explanation by Deimos: https://tildes.net/~tildes/1vl3/is_there_any_interest_in_building_a_tildes_successor#comment-if6r
I've read the recent discussions on Tildes being maintained as is and not actively grown, but I think most of us believe the community is up for many more years of enjoying each other's company, and would like to pick up a few more members along the way if they seek us out. That just requesting to join isn't possible anymore makes me a little sad.
I had the thought that larger sites are able to invest more resources into spam account filtering, many of us have active accounts on other social media sites (or other types of sites with community interactions), and I speculate that almost everyone who finds tildes and is interested in joining has already been active in some other online community. Some of us Tilderinos could post here our handles in other communities, and offer to consider sharing one of our invite requests to Tildes if DM'd in our other community. We'd have to reject requests from new accounts, and use some judgement on established ones, but I am thinking having people go through the filtering process those other communities use would reduce the spam requests enough to make it workable.
What do you guys think?
21 votes -
"Heartbreak mode" versus "Cosy mode"
35 votes -
What internet discussion sites remain?
I'm using the phrase 'internet discussion site' pretty informally, so I hope my meaning will become clearer as you continue reading. I got rid of Snapchat around 4 years ago now. At some point in...
I'm using the phrase 'internet discussion site' pretty informally, so I hope my meaning will become clearer as you continue reading.
I got rid of Snapchat around 4 years ago now. At some point in 2023 I noticed a sharp downtick in discussion quality on Twitter, and got rid of it as well. About two years ago, frustrated with the lack of human interaction and the vying for attention, I deleted Instagram. Near the end of 2025, I stopped using Discord. The final nail in the coffin has now arrived, since I'm unfortunately coming to the conclusion that Reddit is no longer worth visiting, leaving me almost entirely cordoned off from internet communication at a time when more humans are using it than ever before.
I won't bother repeating my personal reasons for this exodus since I feel confident that most people on this website have feelings on the matter that at least approximate my own.
Realistically this is a sign that it's time to prioritize interaction in the real world, and that's certainly a worthwhile thing to pursue. But bluntly society has restructured around the internet in a pretty substantial way, and I don't think it's an unreasonable ask to find various forms of forums on which more meaningful discussions can take place.
Here is my personal survey of the current landscape:- tildes.net: Basically good. I really enjoy this website and I think in a lot of ways the 'bar/pub/cafe' model for a forum, where you can peer through the window but require permission to gain admission, is the only viable model for future online discussion places as the internet becomes ever more saturated with bots and bad actors.
- lobste.rs: Also basically good, for the same reasons as tildes. In some aspects, limited by the fact that it has a particular focus. In other ways, that's a really good thing. Maybe in a perfect world there would be a lobste.rs equivalent for every hobby, and we would return to an early internet forum world.
- Hacker News: Also basically good but perhaps a bit less so than the above two. I think most of the things posted on there are interesting, but a lot of the discussion has lately felt less insightful than it used to. I think a different tildes post noted this as well, but it's very caught up in the AI news cycle, often to an unfortunate degree.
- Rateyourmusic: The core site is enjoyable, and the forums are usually fun to check in on every now and then. Certainly a worthwhile place to visit if you enjoy music.
- Stackexchange networks: This is cheating since this is obviously many sites. I'm a mathematics student and I've found MSE and MathOverflow to be really wonderful places to learn and converse, albeit with some very arcane and strict rules for posting. The philosophy SE seems also generally of a high quality, and there are many other SE sites that I occasionally stumble into and am pleasantly surprised by. Unfortunately I expect its time is finite, since the UX has slowly but surely been degrading and the site traffic dropping.
- Fediverse networks: These sites clearly have potential, but for whatever reason it's still just not there. I drop into lemmy and Mastodon occasionally, but the posts are rarely of high quality. In many ways they just feel like "Reddit/Twitter but with a different name".
Surely these can't be all, right? It's a little soul-crushing to think how many people are online at any given time and how hard it is to find a place not drowning in noise. Maybe this is just my lament.
98 votes -
Jeff the Killer movie in development from TikTok creator Savanah Moss and Tongal
6 votes -
Guess what? Tony P hates you, too.
12 votes -
As Reddit stock falls, CEO questions value of Google’s AI Overviews
61 votes -
Ariana Grande is ‘taking a step back from visibility’ after tour as public scrutiny intensifies
33 votes -
A newbie's guide to self-hosting: GoToSocial part 1 (installation and set-up)
20 votes -
Can sporting success boost tourism and deliver tangible economic gains? Norway suggests this year's World Cup brought not only social media buzz but a clear rise in travel interest.
9 votes -
YouTube Premium to come with Peacock, NBCSports to stream events on YouTube
16 votes -
France becomes the first EU country to ban social media for children
30 votes -
The Filipino virtual assistants behind LinkedIn’s “thought leadership” content mill
33 votes -
Hack reveals suno AI music generator scraped YouTube, Deezer, and Genius
30 votes -
The scrolly chair
14 votes -
Social media influencers Andrew and Tristan Tate arrested in Miami
62 votes -
Four awful new privacy-eroding features from Meta in a month
29 votes -
China is dealing with its own manosphere
35 votes -
Wallflower - A quiet social reader
15 votes -
Discord bans (then unbans) around 8400 accounts because of a CSAM neural hash collision
51 votes -
Blog owners, do you write under your real name, or under a pseudonym?
And what do you write about? Currently, my personal website is under my real name. I'm asking this question because I'm about to rebuild it (as is tradition), which gave me some energy to write...
And what do you write about?
Currently, my personal website is under my real name. I'm asking this question because I'm about to rebuild it (as is tradition), which gave me some energy to write about a recent personal event, and I'm realizing that I'm not comfortable with writing this under my real name. So I'm here, wondering what to do with my personal thoughts that I want to share, but not too loudly.
If you own a personal website or blog, what do you do? Do you use a pseudonym for everything? Are you ok with publishing personal stuff under your real name? Do you have two blogs to separate things?
19 votes -
Arctic seabed mission documents fragile marine life threatened by Norway's deep-sea mining plans – Greenpeace expedition was livestreamed, drawing more than 450,000 viewers on social media platforms
9 votes -
Fines doubled as teens outsmart Australia's world-first social media ban
37 votes