-
36 votes
-
The Glitch Mob - Modular set in a car (Live) (2025)
7 votes -
‘Weapons’ ($42.5M DOM/$70M WW) freaks ‘Freakier Friday’ ($29M DOM/$45M WW) out a bit, Warner Bros’ 2025 box office rally continues
10 votes -
Twenty-one children, some birthed by surrogate mothers, found in connection with LA-area home
19 votes -
Nihilistic online networks groom minors to commit harm. Her son was one of them.
31 votes -
Who will be the next Air Bud? Nationwide search for a star golden retriever begins.
11 votes -
Donald Trump administration to boost US private equity with new 401(k) order
24 votes -
The man who ran a carnival attraction that saved thousands of premature babies wasn’t a doctor at all
33 votes -
On weird America
12 votes -
'Sonny in LA' - Son Heung-min joins LAFC in Major League Soccer record deal
8 votes -
So what happened? Revisiting the superhero and box office questions.
Nearly two years ago, I made a post titled "On the superhero question" and three years ago I made a retrospective on the box office since theaters closed in 2020. So I figured it was time for an...
Nearly two years ago, I made a post titled "On the superhero question" and three years ago I made a retrospective on the box office since theaters closed in 2020.
So I figured it was time for an update.
Re-reading those posts makes me realize how optimistic the theatrical landscape seemed in the wake of Barbenheimer. I don't think I was alone in that; I think the industry felt optimism from that cultural moment as well. That same year was when superhero films imploded, so there was this idea that audiences wanted "real" films. They wanted films by "real" directors, and now there was some discernment from audiences. Grouping both Barbie and Mario, it spoke to the value that other IP now has.
The landscape became much more depressing in 2024. It seems like the idea of audiences flocking to other types of films did not happen. After consistent growth, the box office fell in 2024 from 2023. I remember the panic that the industry felt after both The Fall Guy and Furiosa: A Mad Max Story flopped at the box office. But Inside Out 2, Deadpool and Wolverine breaking out balanced out those disappointments.
Speaking of Deadpool and Wolverine, I remember my prediction of the film being that it would be the lowest-grossing of the Deadpool franchise. Not only that, but I predicted that Joker 2 would outgross it, and we all know how that played out.
Because Deadpool and Wolverine did so well, it delayed the narrative that had been forming throughout 2023, the "superhero fatigue" narrative. It wasn't until now that the narrative is back, and it seems like Deadpool and Wolverine was more of an exception. The film needed 20 years of nostalgia to power it to those numbers. Something under-discussed about D&W's performance is that it was more domestic-heavy than a lot of billion-dollar MCU films (47% DOM split when many of them were in the 30% range throughout the 2010s). Spider-Man: No Way Home also had a split in the 40s, which perhaps was an omen for what was to come.
There were other overperformers throughout 2024, don't get me wrong. Wicked, making over 400M DOM and 700M WW, was not something people were expecting early on. Mufasa: The Lion King still made over 700M WW despite a mediocre reception and a "why would you make this?" issue. But there was certainly a depth issue. Fewer films hit the 100M DOM mark in 2024 than in 2023, and the rest of the top 100 films made less in 2024 than in 2023. It did feel like many films underperformed or did not reach their full potential, which would have helped out the overall box office. Many horror films like Abigail, Night Swim, MaXXXine, could have done better but didn't. Gladiator II would have likely done better if it had been better received. Twisters and Beetlejuice Beetlejuice did well, but didn't get the late legs that would have driven it to 300M totals. Bad Boys: Ride or Die decreased from the previous film. Red One and Bob Marley: One Love didn't crawl past the 100M DOM mark. Little things like that that add up.
So how's 2025 looking so far?
In short, not great. We're currently lagging behind 2024 during the same calendar year. Inside Out 2 and Deadpool and Wolverine contributed over 600M DOM each, while our highest-grossing film this year so far is still A Minecraft Movie, and that didn't even hit 500M DOM (it probably would have if word of mouth wasn't horrendous). We do have three big films left for the year: Zootopia 2, Wicked: For Good, and Avatar: Ash and Fire. All three are potential 500M DOM grossers, although Avatar will be making a majority of its money in the 2026 calendar year. There are also smaller-scale studio films hoping to break out, such as The Running Man, Tron: Ares, and Predator: Badlands.
The issue, though, is that many of these films can underperform, and that's been a common theme this past year. The well-received Thunderbolts could not get in the black, and the much-anticipated Fantastic Four is going to barely break even theatrically. Even Superman, with its great legs, will end up below what many superhero films did during the peak, even mediocre or lesser-known superheroes. It does seem like the box office will continue to collapse since nothing is filling that Disney-sized void. Outside of superhero films, Lilo and Stitch didn't perform as well as it could have and neither did Minecraft.
So it's kind of grim. I mean, in reality, movie-going reached its peak in 2002. It has been declining in admissions ever since. So it was perhaps naive to think that the growth we experienced from 2021 to 2023 would continue. But it really seems like the domestic box office will continue to decline, and the international box office has collapsed for a lot of Hollywood films, specifically comic book films. So we're entering a very different landscape, a much more muted world for films from now on. And it will likely continue to shrink.
Now markets shift, they can shift back up. The international market can be brought up again (Superhero movies used to always play better with domestic audiences). But I'm certainly not as optimistic as I once was.
24 votes -
Chappell Roan says her second album ‘doesn’t exist yet’: ‘It’s probably going to take at least five’ years
13 votes -
Donald Trump administration proposes regulatory changes that threaten every unfinished wind project in the US
18 votes -
Rescue crews are searching for US climate journalist Alec Luhn, who vanished while hiking on a glacier in Folgefonna National Park in southwestern Norway
14 votes -
Florida snake hunters deploy robotic toy rabbits to capture invasive Burmese pythons
6 votes -
ESPN buys NFL Media, RedZone in major sports deal
9 votes -
Matmos - I'm Fine I'm Fine/Adepts (2020)
2 votes -
Roku launching Howdy, a $3/month Ad-Free subscription service
11 votes -
Former Birkenstock building to be turned into design museum
8 votes -
NASA won't publish key climate change report online, citing 'no legal obligation' to do so
34 votes -
Life and death aboard a B-17, 1944
16 votes -
Gates Foundation commits $2.5 billion to ignored, underfunded women's health
27 votes -
Box office: ‘Fantastic Four’ craters by 66% in second weekend
18 votes -
Meta violated privacy law, jury says in menstrual data fight
40 votes -
Web3 is going great: tracking the financial damage of crypto
12 votes -
At 17, Hannah Cairo solved a math mystery
26 votes -
Blood Box - A World of Hurt (1997)
3 votes -
Miami jury orders Tesla to pay hundreds of millions in damages in Autopilot crash case
42 votes -
Make electricity cheap again (part 1)
7 votes -
Panama Playlists — Examining the listening habits of celebrities, journalists, and politicians by scraping their Spotify accounts
16 votes -
Chappell Roan - The Subway (2025)
7 votes -
Béla Fleck - Big Country (1998)
10 votes -
Early universe’s ‘little red dots’ may be black hole stars
17 votes -
NASA-ISRO satellite lifts off to track Earth’s changing surfaces
9 votes -
Adam Sandler’s ‘Happy Gilmore 2’ debuts to 46.7 million views, biggest Netflix US film opening ever
15 votes -
8.8 magnitude earthquake near Russia prompts tsunami alerts in Hawaii, Alaska and West Coast
42 votes -
US federal government ends information delivery contract critical to hurricane forecasting
20 votes -
Novo Nordisk shares plunge 20% after Wegovy maker names new CEO and cuts full-year guidance
10 votes -
A mysterious LLC is using antique law to go after sports betting in Washington DC
22 votes -
she's green - Willow (2025)
5 votes -
Patrick Keel, the forgotten pioneer behind the LCD Soundsystem sound
14 votes -
The Internet Archive is now an official US federal documents library
51 votes -
Fast food pricing games are ridiculous
This morning I found a receipt in my kitchen. It was from my roommate, who had ordered pizza from Dominoes the night before. When I looked at it, I was shocked. There was a single line item on the...
This morning I found a receipt in my kitchen. It was from my roommate, who had ordered pizza from Dominoes the night before. When I looked at it, I was shocked. There was a single line item on the order, two large pizzas for the sum of $75.98 USD. I thought, "what the hell is this? How is he spending so much on pizza? And the junk they sell at Dominos? They don't even make the crust there!"
But then I looked down to the actual amount paid and it had a discount: $54.00 off the price for buying two of them. So the effective price was a much more reasonable $10.99 each. That's less than a third of the sticker price. After tax and an in-house delivery fee, it was still under half of that price.
I don't eat out that often, and fast food is especially rare for me, so I've been fairly insulated from this, but it seems that this kind of thing is happening everywhere. One pizza place I do get food from occasionally is Pieology. Their pizzas were roughly $10 not too long ago, but in recent years those prices have ballooned, with some locations asking for $15 for the same pizza order. But the secret is that they are actually still selling pizzas for those prices if you use their app - it's just that instead of giving you the real price, you get free "perks", which is your choice of a drink, cookie, and things to that effect. I never go to McDonalds, but I've heard endless complaining about how expensive it is. The retort I hear is, "you better get the app". The app is a privacy nightmare that requires practically every permission it could ask for in order to function, so rather than actually getting deals you're just subsidizing the cost of your food with the sale of your personal data.
There's almost no way to definitively prove this, but one argument that I find compelling as to why restaurants are doing this is because of delivery apps. Delivery apps take omission from the purchase price, and people really don't like seeing that they're paying more for things on the apps than they would be in the stores, so shops are raising the base price of their food in order to make things seem more fair, while offering in-store discounts so that they don't lose out on revenue from lower-income people who wouldn't order from delivery apps. If that's the case, that would mean that people ordering from those delivery apps are not only paying more for the privilege, but they are actively pushing up the prices for everyone else as well. And that's just ridiculous.
22 votes -
South Park mocks Donald Trump
88 votes -
Becoming numb to American violence
16 votes -
The End Kidney Deaths Act
13 votes -
The DNA of the late American composer Alvin Lucier continues to compose music
4 votes -
North Korean hackers ran US-based “laptop farm” from Arizona woman’s home
25 votes -
The Nintendo Switch 2 is the fastest-selling gaming hardware in US history
29 votes -
Why free buses in NYC could backfire horribly
24 votes