-
10 votes
-
Premier of Québec, François Legault, says crucifix 'not religious symbol'
11 votes -
The man who dodged the Dogecoin
10 votes -
MongoDB switches its open-source license from AGPLv3 to the newly created "Server Side Public License"
10 votes -
By the light of the Moon: Turing recreates scene of iconic lunar landing
4 votes -
A genocide incited on Facebook, with posts from Myanmar’s military
8 votes -
The Kansas City Chiefs’ defense is worse than their offense is great
6 votes -
Make threads Kindle / print friendly
I wished to set aside some threads to read on my Kindle. I use the Kindle Chrome extension for that, but on Tildes it only captures the main topic, not the comments. I tried saving the page...
I wished to set aside some threads to read on my Kindle. I use the Kindle Chrome extension for that, but on Tildes it only captures the main topic, not the comments. I tried saving the page locally but the Kindle app still didn't work. My only option on Chrome seems to be printing to PDF, but that's a subpar solution. I was able to convert the offline page to mobi using Calibre, though, but this is not very practical and the result was not that good.
maybe I should have written conversion friendly, because printing to paper/PDF is working fine
12 votes -
Editorial cartoon: Sept. 29, 2018 - The newest piece from award-winning artist Bruce MacKinnon
45 votes -
Artifact - Draft mode gameplay - Drafting a deck with Richard Garfield
6 votes -
Comparison between several messenger systems
9 votes -
Study of Puerto Rico rainforest shows massive, climate-driven decline in population of insects and insect-eating animals
9 votes -
Ten books that defined the 1910s
10 votes -
How Manhattan became a rich ghost town
14 votes -
Learning English from the ground up
There was a recent thread on ~talk about which linguistics habits people find annoying, and much to my horror, I have most of those which were mentioned. After thinking about it a little more, I...
There was a recent thread on ~talk about which linguistics habits people find annoying, and much to my horror, I have most of those which were mentioned. After thinking about it a little more, I realized that a lot of these habits were picked up from the media I consume and the people I interact with. I also feel that this problem is exacerbated by my poor knowledge of English grammar.
While I was taught grammar at an elementary level in school, I didn't quite grok it back then, and mostly relied on my instinct, as to what "sounded" right. I have since forgotten most of what I had learnt, and my instinct is failing me - my grammar is atrocious, my punctuation is terrible and I only have auto-correct to thank for my spelling.
I understand that English, like other languages, is constantly evolving. What is wrong now might be right tomorrow. However, I believe that this is no excuse for my shortcomings as there is merit speaking and writing in accordance with what is considered correct in the present day.
I would like to learn English from "first principles", and would greatly appreciate if some users could suggest some books/resources which could help me (bonus points for resources pertaining to British English). Any other suggestions would also be great.
Thanks, and have a nice day.
24 votes -
American mercenaries were hired to assassinate politicians in the Middle East
14 votes -
Instagram Has a Massive Harassment Problem
24 votes -
'Do Not Track' the Privacy Tool Used by Millions of People, Doesn't Do Anything
20 votes -
What are you reading this week? #4
What are you reading currently? Fiction or non-fiction, any genre, any language! Tell us what you're reading, and talk a bit about it. Please also tell me if you think this is too frequent, in...
What are you reading currently? Fiction or non-fiction, any genre, any language! Tell us what you're reading, and talk a bit about it.
Please also tell me if you think this is too frequent, in which case I can switch to doing this once a month instead of every other week. I'll edit the post text to append the decision. Have a nice weekend!
15 votes -
One healthy diversity data point: research reports an uptick in women applying for IT jobs
4 votes -
Toronto police allowed to take part in 2019 Pride parade, organizers say
7 votes -
The man who broke politics: Newt Gingrich turned partisan battles into bloodsport, wrecked Congress, and paved the way for Trump's rise. Now he's reveling in his achievements.
16 votes -
The hidden air pollution inside your workplace
7 votes -
China breaks silence on Muslim detention camps, calling them ‘humane’
9 votes -
Why Trump should give a million dollars to Elizabeth Warren's favorite charity
3 votes -
Doctor Who S11E02 'The Ghost Monument' discussion thread
Prompted by the comment just left by @Adams on the first post, I thought I'd make a topic for the next episode! So what did people think? For those of you who weren't particularly into the first...
Prompted by the comment just left by @Adams on the first post, I thought I'd make a topic for the next episode!
So what did people think? For those of you who weren't particularly into the first episode, did this one work better for you? (If not, no hard feelings, I'm just curious why/why not~)
I'll stick my thoughts in a comment again.
14 votes -
The PlayStation 4 fails at handling text strings; can be bricked by receiving messages.
19 votes -
Minor search update: topic tags are now included in search
Not a very major update, but I figured it was worth letting everyone know: search has been expanded a bit to also cover topics' tags in addition to their title and markdown (for text topics). So...
Not a very major update, but I figured it was worth letting everyone know: search has been expanded a bit to also cover topics' tags in addition to their title and markdown (for text topics). So if you search for a term that was only included in a topic's tags but not its title/text, it should come up in the results now.
On that subject, are there any other pieces of data that you think should be included by default in search? In the future, I'd like to support searching certain parts of data deliberately (for example, maybe by writing a query like
url:article
to find only link topics with "article" in their url), but that's different from including it automatically in all searches. As a specific example, if you search for "youtube.com" or even "youtube", should all link topics from YouTube come up, or only topics that have the word "youtube" somewhere in their title/text/tags?47 votes -
Twilio to Acquire SendGrid, the Leading Email API Platform
8 votes -
Palestinians warn Jerusalem shift would turn Australia into 'international pariah' and risk trade
6 votes -
Foreign disinformation is killing Americans
9 votes -
Sneaky subscriptions are plaguing the App Store
16 votes -
Scald - Will of the Gods is Great Power [Melodic Epic Doom, 1996]
5 votes -
'We need to know the sex. If it’s a girl we are going to terminate it'
25 votes -
Tech suffers from lack of humanities, says Mozilla head
10 votes -
Star Citizen - FOIP Face Tracking #2 - Space Delivery
9 votes -
seriously tho stop touching venus fly traps it hurts them.
post-mortem: holy actual beans dudes this is my most popular post by far! what'd you cats like about it so much? i swear to god my brain and body work in tandom to make sure i never actually do...
post-mortem: holy actual beans dudes this is my most popular post by far! what'd you cats like about it so much?
i swear to god my brain and body work in tandom to make sure i never actually do anything productive.
i came to starbucks exclusively to work on some backend stuff for a project i've got, and i've spent the last hour sipping coffee, watching Joji music videos, and writing this lmao.
i wish there was something like cocaine that wasn't, well, cocaine, that you could take and then you'd be like "hey maybe i should clean my room. hey it's a nice day out i should take a walk. ya know if i get work done now, i can actually take a break without feeling like lazy trash later on!"
actually
that sounds like weed.
i need to move to a legal state lmao.
but in order to do that i gotta get better at programming so i can actually get a car (ya fucked up, bishop) and get a new place.
catch-22's are like so literally my favorite thing (:
anyway this isn't even the poem lmao i'm just sober ranting at the internet.
esskeetiiiiiit
<poem>there's this
black hole lingers
'round every corner.obscure sounds
dark haze,
and no bordersit looms near,
strikes fear
when it's closerheart runs,
hands shake,
i get colder./
sometimes
i get close
take a peek inlow growl
sounds loud
gotta feed itaudrey
she's hungry
when you're bleedingjumped in-
to my blood
i'm her beacon/
now i can't shake
this damned desire, god
i think i gotta call heram i safer when she's
gone? she's in my dreams
do i still love her?my best friend is
mad, the shit i do
only appalls her.the pit, it's in my
stomach, god i
feel it getting stronger./
audrey
audrey
keep the peace, please.
audrey
audrey
play my heart strings.
you told me to
obey you baby,
you control me.
audrey
lay me
to rest in peace
bishop
(p.s. i noticed that there always seems to be a vote on my post like the second after i post my poetry shit. whoever you are you're cute af and i love you ok)
19 votes -
Programming Challenge: Polygon analysis.
It's time for another programming challenge! Given a list of coordinate pairs on a 2D plane that describe the vertices of a polygon, determine whether the polygon is concave or convex. Since a...
It's time for another programming challenge!
Given a list of coordinate pairs on a 2D plane that describe the vertices of a polygon, determine whether the polygon is concave or convex.
Since a polygon could potentially be any shape if we don't specify which vertices connect to which, we'll assume that the coordinates are given in strict order such that adjacent coordinates in the list are connected. Specifically, if we call the list
V[1, n]
and say thatV[i] <-> V[j]
means "vertex i and vertex j are connected", then for each arbitraryV[i]
we haveV[i-1] <-> V[i] <-> V[i+1]
. Moreover, sinceV[1]
andV[n]
are at the ends of the list,V[1] <-> V[n]
holds (i.e. the list "wraps around").Finally, for simplicity we can assume that all coordinates are unique, that all polygon descriptions generate valid polygons with 3 or more non-overlapping sides, and that, yes, we're working with coordinates that exist in the set of real numbers only. Don't over-complicate it :)
For those who want an even greater challenge, extend this out to work with 3D space!
8 votes -
Scientists chase mystery of how dogs process words
6 votes -
The Keeper of the Ghost Trees (Albino Redwoods) - Great Big Story
4 votes -
Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison open to following President Donald Trump in moving Israel embassy to Jerusalem
7 votes -
How 500 Days of Summer gets the Manic Pixie Dream Girl right
12 votes -
Facebook to ban misinformation on voting in upcoming U.S. elections
10 votes -
Forget The Ticket — Could You Get Arrested For A Parking Violation?
5 votes -
The making of Fallout Shelter
14 votes -
Amy Winehouse hologram to start touring in 2019
13 votes -
Liberapay status update: Still alive, moving to Stripe and PayPal
9 votes -
Phoenix Framework 1.4.0 release candidate
6 votes -
How to Manage Connections Efficiently in Postgres, or Any Database
8 votes -
American Truck Simulator: Oregon is published!
10 votes