-
8 votes
-
Facebook can't find anyone left at Cambridge Analytica
7 votes -
Surveillance capitalism has led us into a dystopia
23 votes -
Saudis’ image makers: A troll army and a Twitter insider
7 votes -
VC folks talk about social media, community, and the failings - includes ex-product head of YouTube
3 votes -
Halfbakery (is back)
13 votes -
Platform for discussion not centred around the sharing of links
~talk seems to fit this criteria, but as I browse Tildes to my dismay the majority of content is re-posts of links from external sources. Obviously, there are also quite a few posts which are more...
~talk seems to fit this criteria, but as I browse Tildes to my dismay the majority of content is re-posts of links from external sources. Obviously, there are also quite a few posts which are more than simply URL pastes, and even in the comments of a URL post, there can be healthy discourse happening.
But I am interested to discover whether anyone here knows of any other platforms that are entirely dedicated to written discussion and communication, where external links do not play a big part in that ecosystem of discourse.
16 votes -
Brazil election court boosts fake-news fight with runoff looming
6 votes -
Twitter makes datasets available containing accounts, tweets, and media from accounts associated with influence campaigns from the IRA and Iran
8 votes -
The weird world of secret menus
7 votes -
A genocide incited on Facebook, with posts from Myanmar’s military
8 votes -
Foreign disinformation is killing Americans
9 votes -
Facebook to ban misinformation on voting in upcoming U.S. elections
10 votes -
Mastodon's two year anniversary: A retrospective
16 votes -
‘I Fundamentally Believe That My Time at Reddit Made the World a Worse Place’
31 votes -
The rise and demise of RSS
11 votes -
Reddit is changing the r/popular algorithm so that more discussion-focused subreddits and posts gain visibility
56 votes -
Why we’re still not ready for ‘like-war’
3 votes -
Alphabet to shut Google+ social site after user data exposed
18 votes -
DOJ demands Facebook information from 'anti-administration activists'
17 votes -
The very first social network
10 votes -
Did Facebook lLearn anything from the Cambridge Analytica debacle? An even bigger data breach suggests it didn’t.
14 votes -
Is this place going to become the anti-thesis of Voat?
I just joined this website today and I like it quite a bit already. Several of the design choices seem to be really well thought out and the community seems pretty open to discussion, etc. While...
I just joined this website today and I like it quite a bit already. Several of the design choices seem to be really well thought out and the community seems pretty open to discussion, etc. While reading the initial email you receive when signing up, the creator talks about how this place isn't going to be a bastion of free speech and certain types of content (hate speech, etc) won't be tolerated and I understand where he is coming from.
I'm sure many people are aware of Voat and how it was a response to Reddit censoring several subreddits (/r/the_donald, /r/fatpeoplehate, etc) and if you go there now, it's pretty much exactly the type of demographic you would expect to occupy those subreddits originally.
But while I can see where the creator is coming from with his approach, I guess I'm just curious where you guys would draw the line? Because making a place that caters to people that you could say are on the opposite side of the Voat spectrum seems like a great breeding ground for another echo chamber. And I guess I've become a bit disillusioned with the idea that I can get "balanced" opinions on controversial topics on content-aggregate websites. Maybe that's not even possible with this format. Either way, I'm wondering if anyone feels the same.
64 votes -
The future of war will be ‘liked’
6 votes -
Disinformation, ‘fake news’ and influence campaigns on Twitter
13 votes -
Raised by YouTube - The platform’s entertainment for children is weirder—and more globalized—than adults could have expected
11 votes -
'Last Jedi' hate tweets were "weaponized" by Russia, says study
10 votes -
The future of GOG: Mod support, Steam rivalry and problematic tweets
23 votes -
A penthouse made for Instagram
15 votes -
Reddit Experimenting with Community Points & Polls
17 votes -
In test case, US fails to force Facebook to wiretap Messenger (voice) calls
9 votes -
The Existential Void of the Pop-Up ‘Experience’
29 votes -
Reddit announces a "revamp" of quarantined subreddits, then quarantines multiple major subreddits
31 votes -
'Rank socialism': Facebook removes senator's official page over hate speech
8 votes -
Here's proof that Russian-backed accounts pushed the Nike boycott
12 votes -
WhatsApp cofounder Brian Acton gives the inside story on #DeleteFacebook and why he left $850 million behind
20 votes -
Cybernetics pioneer Norbert Wiener on the malady of “content” and how to save creative culture from the syphoning of substance
6 votes -
Facebook
7 votes -
How Charlottesville forced Reddit to clean up its act
16 votes -
What to do about reddit and trolls?
So I was following this discussion on Reddit today about someone finding evidence of Russia trolls finding a safe haven on reddit and the admins not addressing it. And then also this one on Tildes...
So I was following this discussion on Reddit today about someone finding evidence of Russia trolls finding a safe haven on reddit and the admins not addressing it.
And then also this one on Tildes that clears up why the OP deleted his account and the Reddit admin's overall poor response.
So I was wondering...is there any way to fix reddit? I've all but left it, but I really wish it wasn't so horrible a place to be.
In one of the reddit threads, a user posted an idea of having many many redditors all refuse to log in to reddit for a single day as a protest against how the site is being ran. Would this be advisable or effective? What other things could be done to "wake up" the site owners to what has been going on for so long?
EDIT: Here was the reddit admin team's response to the incident.
22 votes -
Reddit, Tildes and their culture/behavior surrounding jokes. What are your thoughts on them?
Do you sometimes find yourself typing up a joke reply typical of Reddit but then remember this is Tildes and stop? I do it quite often (less and less the more time I spend on the site, however)....
Do you sometimes find yourself typing up a joke reply typical of Reddit but then remember this is Tildes and stop? I do it quite often (less and less the more time I spend on the site, however).
I'm even doing it less and less on Reddit itself. Like, yeah, the puns is one of the things I used to love about Reddit the most when I first joined. But that's sort of the problem.
There's always new people joining and finding the beaten-to-death jokes hilarious and so they upvote them. Which means, after one year or two 90% of Reddit jokes are old to you and have been repeated ad nauseam.
Not only that, but since they're a quick and sure way to gain others' approval (via karma) people often try to force them anywhere. No matter how inappropriate they are at that time, how forced and out of place they look. To the point that they're often the first child comment of serious comments asking serious questions.
Which means that if you're interested in reading the serious answer to that question you have scroll down past the joke, and that's even provided there's an actual answer. And I'm pretty sure many questions are left unanswered because whoever has a relevant serious answer won't feel like wasting their time typing up a reply no one will see because it will be buried under the joke reply.
With that said, what do you think of “silly” or “witty” jokes on Tildes? Do you think they should be encouraged? Discouraged? That nothing should be done about them? What about the ones that get repeated ad nauseam, are they even controllable?
I also just remembered there was talk about introducing a “joke” tag that would allow users to not see them if they don't want to or to see only jokes if they so wish. What do you think of this tag proposal? I think it could be very, very useful.
Disclaimer:
There is a chance that some users will interpret this post as some form of rant or an attempt at policing the site even further. I just want to state that my objective with this post is to spark a general and open discussion about this topic, to gauge the opinions of other users and get a feel for what the general community thinks about them (if there's an overwhelming majority that shares an opinion, or if the community is highly fragmented with regards to the topic and if so, in what proportions... etc), to see if there's anything that we can do about it or if there's anything that should be done at all, for example. I am not trying to spark controversy or drama and I mean my post to be one that's constructive, friendly, in good faith and respectful and not on that's toxic or negative or disrespectful.
40 votes -
Text of u/DivestTrump's post about T_D and Russia propaganda that was deleted
51 votes -
Twitch vanishes in China weeks after spike in popularity
21 votes -
The right to bear arms (and say shocking stuff on Facebook)
8 votes -
Political extremists are using YouTube to monetize their toxic ideas
26 votes -
It's Reddit's turn: The 'front page of the internet' should be next to face US Congress
22 votes -
Mastodon is better than Twitter: Elevator pitch
32 votes -
Reddit continues its banning spree, r/GreatAwakening has been banned
This was the QAnon subreddit. I filtered it a while ago so not really sure what they’ve been up to of late, but I expect just more of the same. That subreddit genuinely terrified me honestly.
47 votes -
What do you think about reddits thebanout? Are you supporting it or not, and why?
I personally think that if it doesn't get reigned in, it will destroy a LOT about reddit.
16 votes -
Reddit has banned the QAnon conspiracy subreddit r/GreatAwakening
15 votes