• Activity
  • Votes
  • Comments
  • New
  • All activity
    1. Suggestions regarding clickbait and misinformation

      One thing (amongst many) that always bothered me in my 6+ years of using Reddit was their lax rules about posting clickbait articles and straight up misinformation. In my opinion this was...

      One thing (amongst many) that always bothered me in my 6+ years of using Reddit was their lax rules about posting clickbait articles and straight up misinformation. In my opinion this was something that contributed to the rise of radical communities and echochambers in the website.

      In this post I'll talk about Clickbait, Unreliable studies, and Misinformation. I'll give examples for each one and suggest a way to deal with it.

      Clickbait-

      Let's start with the most benign one. These days most big websites use clickbait and hyperbole to gain more traffic. It's something that they have to do in order to survive in today's media climate and I sort of understand. But I think that as a community in Tildes we should raise our standards and avoid posting any article that uses clickbait, instead directly link to the source that the article cites.

      An example would be: An article titled "Life on Mars found: Scientists claim that they have found traces of life on the red planet".

      But when you read the original source it only states that "Mars rover Curiosity has identified a variety of organic molecules" and that "These results do not give us any evidence of life,".
      (This may be a bad/exaggrated example but I think it gets my point across.)

      On Reddit the mods give these kinds of posts a "Misleading" tag. But the damage is already done, most of the users won't read the entire article or even the source, and instead will make comments based on the headline.
      I personally think that these kinds of posts should be deleted even if they get a discussion going in the comments.

      Unreliable studies-

      This is a bit more serious than clickbait. It's something that I see the most in subjects of psychology, social science and futurism.
      These are basically articles about studies that conclude a very interesting result, but when you dig a bit you find that the methodologies used to conduct the study were flawed and that the results are inconclusive.

      An (real) example would be: "A new study finds that cutting your time on social media to 30 minutes a day reduces your risk of depression and loneliness"
      Link: https://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-instagram-snapchat-social-media-well-being-2018-11

      At first glance this looks legit, I even agree with the results. But lets see how this study was conducted:

      In the study, 143 undergraduate students were tested over the course of two semesters.

      After three weeks, the students were asked questions to assess their mental health across seven different areas

      Basically, their test group was 143 students, The test was only conducted for 6 months, and the results were self-reported.

      Clearly, this is junk. This study doesn't show anything reliable. Yet still, it received a lot of upvotes on Reddit and there was a lot of discussion going. I only spotted 2-3 comments (at the bottom) mentioning that the study is unreliable.

      Again, I think that posts with studies like this should be deleted regardless if there is a discussion going in the comments or not.

      Misinformation-

      This is in my opinion the biggest offender and the most dangerous one. It's something that I see in political subreddits (even the big ones like /r/politics and /r/worldnews). It's when an article straight up spreads misinformation both in the headline and in the content in order to incite outrage or paint a narrative.

      Note: I will give an example that bashes a "left-leaning" article that is against Trump. I'm only doing this because I only read left-leaning to neutral articles and don't go near anything that is right-leaning. Because of this I don't have any examples of a right-leaning article spreading misinformation (I'm sure that there are a lot).

      An example would be this article: "ADMINISTRATION ADMITS BORDER DEPLOYMENT WAS A $200 MILLION ELECTION STUNT"
      Link: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/11/trump-troops-border-caravan-stunt

      There are two lies here:

      1. Trump administration did not admit to anything. (The article's use of the word 'Admit' is supposedly justified with 'They indirectly admitted to it'. I personally think this is a bad excuse.)
      2. Most importantly, the 200 million figure is pure speculation. If you go to the older article that this article cites, the 200m figure comes from a speculation that the operation could cost up to 200m if the number of troops sent to the border is 15,000 and they stay there for more than 2 months.
        In reality the number of troops sent was 8,500 and they stayed for only a few days/weeks.

      A few days after this article was published it turned out that the operation costed 70 million. Still a big sum, still ridiculous. But it's almost a third of what the article claimed.

      The misinformation in this example is fairly benign. But I've seen countless other articles with even more outrageous claims that force a certain narrative. This is done by both sides of the political spectrum.

      Not only do I think that we should delete these kinds of posts in Tildes, in my opinion we should black list websites that are frequent offenders of spreading misinformation.
      Examples off the top of my head would be: Vanity Fair, Salon.com, of course far right websites like Fox News, Info Wars and Breitbart.
      A good rule in my opinion would be: If three posts from a certain website get deleted for spreading misinformation, that website should be blacklisted from Tildes.

      In conclusion:
      I think we should set some rules against these problems while our community is still in the early stages. Right now I don't see any of these 3 problems on Tildes. But if we don't enforce rules against them, they will start to pop up the more users we gain.

      I'll be happy to know your opinions and suggestions on the matter!

      32 votes
    2. Recommendation for new Oculus compatible machine help

      Hey all. My old computer is fine, but the Oculus software has recently pushed an update where it no longer starts up, attempting to repair the software uninstalled it, and the install errors out...

      Hey all. My old computer is fine, but the Oculus software has recently pushed an update where it no longer starts up, attempting to repair the software uninstalled it, and the install errors out despite clearing out the install cache and existing files while running it in network capable Safe mode with Defender off as recommended.

      Eventually I narrowed it down to this error. https://forums.oculusvr.com/community/discussion/71083/cant-install-software-exiting-with-code-18 and since I'm using an old HP xw8400 build with two Xeon 5355 processors, it does kind of check out that this latest update finally became incompatible with my processor and it may be time to upgrade anyway. To my knowledge, there isn't really a way to get a more modern processor onto the motherboard, and I'm not going to rage at Oculus for not supporting hardware they were never supporting in the first place. (Auto Update and being unable to downgrade is meh, but I'm not going to win that fight.)

      So what would you guys recommended for a new processor/ram/motherboard combination? My Graphics Card (RX480) and hard drive is still fine, and I'd like to keep it on the cheap for as much as we can do with VR.

      6 votes
    3. As someone with ADHD, I hate the "RTFM" motto

      I'm a student of software engineering. I'm not a programmer yet, but I use software that is common among this crowd, like i3wm, Neovim and Emacs. I know how to find and read documentation. I've...

      I'm a student of software engineering. I'm not a programmer yet, but I use software that is common among this crowd, like i3wm, Neovim and Emacs. I know how to find and read documentation. I've read the obnoxious How To Ask Questions the Smart Way. Every time I encounter an issue, I do my diligence. I go through the manuals, I google, I read the docs. My main editor, Emacs, has an extensive manual, with plenty of accurate details. I get that's a huge program (more like a platform, really), but let's just say that a black-and-white 650 pages PDF is not the most ADHD friendly thing in the world.

      I'm aware that I chose a career that requires plenty of reading, but I happen to like it a lot and it seems like I have some aptitude for it. I had similar issues in my previous activities anyway. But it's discouraging trying to understand programming and complex software, only to be repelled by people who think everyone has their ability for concentration. Sometimes I completely lose track of time. I can sit on my computer and hyperfocus for up to 48 hours with 20 Chrome tabs open non-stop and Netflix on the background. I may seem productive, but I'm not reading anything. Maybe I read one paragraph or two, and 30 seconds later I can't remember what I was doing. But I still have tasks to accomplish, and sometimes I need help to find useful information on a 700 pages manual.

      Luckily I have a great support and determination and have accomplished a lot, but my peers have no idea what I went through to get to where I am. What I don't have in natural born skills I compensate with a lot of raw effort. Everyone has their difficulties and I'm not seeking compassion, but I'd like to suggest people think twice before dismissing as "lazy" someone you know nothing about. That person might have a mental disorder, a reading disorder or even an intellectual disability. Do you wanna be the guy who told a dyslexic to just read the fucking manual?

      EDIT: of course I get that time and energy are limited commodities... my point is: don't be an asshole about it. Do what you can and you wanna do, but there's no need to use hostile buzzwords when you communicate with less knowledgeable people. You're not even forced to answer... I much prefer not getting an answer than getting a hostile one.

      26 votes
    4. European Soccer - This week results (10.10.2018) - *Includes UEFA Nations League results*

      First of all, I want to apologise for the delay of this weekly post. Yesterday I did not have the time to write it, because with the inclusion of the Nations League it would have taken me time I...

      First of all, I want to apologise for the delay of this weekly post. Yesterday I did not have the time to write it, because with the inclusion of the Nations League it would have taken me time I did not have.
      With that being said, here are last week national and international results:

      UEFA Nations League - Matchweek 5-6

      The four group winners of League A qualify for the Nations League Finals in June 2019:
      Netherlands, Switzerland, Portugal, England

      The following teams are promoted to a higher league:
      B->A Ukraine, Sweden, Bosnia & Erzegovina, DenmarK
      C->B Scotland, Finland, Norway, Serbia
      D->C Georgia, Belarus, Kosovo, FYR Macedonia

      The following teams are relegated to a lower league:
      A->B Germany, Iceland, Poland, Croatia
      B->C Slovakia, Turkey, Northern Ireland, Ireland
      C->D Estonia, Slovenia, Cyprus, Lithuania

      Match Score Statistics
      League A - Group 1
      Germany-Netherlands 2-2 9' Werner T., 20' Sane L.; 85' Promes Q., 90+1' van Dijk V.
      Netherlands-France 2-0 44' Wijnaldum G., 90+6'(Pen) Depay M.
      League A - Group 2
      Switzerland-Belgium 5-2 26'(Pen) Rodriguez R., 31', 44', 84' Seferovic H., 62' Elvedi N.; 2', 17' Hazard T.
      Belgium-Iceland 2-0 65', 81' Btshuayi M.
      League A - Group 3
      Portugal-Poland 1-1 34' Silva An.; 66'(Pen) Milik A.
      Italy-Portugal 0-0
      League A - Group 4
      England-Croatia 2-1 78' Lingard J., 85' Kane H.; 57' Kramaric A.
      Croazia-Spain 3-2 54' Kramaric A., 67', 90+3' Jedvaj T.; 56' Ceballos D., 78'(Pen) Ramos S.
      League B - Group 1
      Czech Republic-Slovakia 1-0 32' Schick P.
      Slovakia-Ukraine 4-1 6' Rusnak A., 26' Kucka J., 52' Zrelak A., 61' Mak R.; 47' Konoplyanka E.
      League B - Group 2
      Sweden-Russia 2-0 41' Lindelof V., 72' Berg M.
      Turkey-Sweden 0-1 71' Granqvist A.
      League B - Group 3
      Northern Ireland-Austria 1-2 57' Evans C.; 49' Schlager X., 90+3' Lazaro V.
      Austria-Bosnia & Herzegovina 0-0
      League B - Group 4
      Denmark-Ireland 0-0
      Wales-Denmark 1-2 89' Bale G.; 42' Jorgensen N., 88' Braithwaite M.
      League C - Group 1
      Scotland-Israel 3-2 34', 43', 64' Forrest J.; 9' Kayal B., 75' Zahavi E.
      Albania-Scoltland 0-4 14' Fraser R., 45+2' Fletcher(Pen), 55', 67' Forrest J.
      League C - Group 2
      Greece-Estonia 0-1 44ì(OG) Lambropoulos K.
      Hungary-Finland 2-0 29' Szalai A., 37' Nagy A.
      Greece-Finland 1-0 25'(OG) Granlund A.
      Hungary-Estonia 2-0 8' Orban W., 69' Szalai A.
      League C - Group 3
      Bulgaria-Slovenia 1-1 68' Ivanov G; 75' Zajc M.
      Cyprus-Norway 0-2 36', 48' Kamara O.
      Cyprus-Bulgaria 1-1 24' Zachariou P.; 89'(Pen) Dimitrov N.
      Slovenia-Norway 1-1 9' Verbic B.; 85' Johnsen B.
      League C - Group 4
      Montenegro-Romania 0-1 44' Tucudean G.
      Serbia-Lithuania 4-1 51'(OG) Zulpa A., 58' Mitrovic A., 71' Prijovic A., Ljajic A.; 64' Petravicius D.
      Romania-Lithuania 3-0 7' Puscas G., 47' Keseru C., 65' Stanciu N.
      Serbia-Montenegro 2-1 30' Ljajic A., 32' Mitrovic A.; 70' Mugosa S.
      League D - Group 1
      Andorra-Latvia 0-0
      Georgia-Kazakhstan 2-1 59' Merebashvili G., 84' Chakvetadze G.; 90' Omietayev O.
      Andorra-Georgia 1-1 63' Martinez C.; 9' Chakvetadze G.
      Kazakhstan-Latvia 1-1 377' Suyumbayev G.; 49' Rakeis D.
      League D - Group 2
      Moldova-Luxemburg 1-1 58'(Pen) Ginsari R.; 70' Bensi S.
      San Marino-Belarus 0-2 8' Dragun S.,52' Saroka A.
      Luxemburg-Belarus 0-2 37', 54' Dragun S.
      San Marino-Moldova 0-1 78' Damascan V.
      League D - Group 3
      Kosovo-Azerbaijan 4-0 2', 50', 76' Zeneli A., 61' Rrahamani A.
      Malta-Faroe Islands 1-1 4' Corbolan J.; 3' Joensen R.
      Azerbaijan-Faroe Islands 2-0 18'(OG) Nattestad S., 28' Madatov M.
      Malta-Kosovo 0-5 15' Muriqi V., 70' Kololli B., 78', 80' Avdijaj D, 86' Rashica M.
      League D - Group 4
      FYR Macedonia-Gibiltar 4-0 27' Bardhi E., 67', 80' Nestorowski I., 82' Velkoski D.
      Liechtenstein-Armenia 2-2
      Gibraltar-Armenia 2-6 10' De Barr T., 78' Priestley A.; 27', 48', 52', 54' Movsisyan Y., 66' Karapetian A., 90+4' Karapetian A.
      Liechtenstein-FYR Macedonia 0-2 53' Bardhi E., 90+1' Nestorowski I.

      English Premier League - Matchweek 13

      Match Score Statistics
      Burnley-Newcastle 1-2 40' Vokes S.; 4'(OG) Mee B., 23' Clark C.
      Bournemouth-Arsenal 1-2 45+1' King J.; 30'(OG) Lerma J., 67' Aubameyang P.
      Brighton-Leicester 1-1 15' Murray G.; 78'(Pen) Vardy J.
      Everton-Cardiff 1-0 59' Sigurdsson G.
      Fulham-Southampton 3-2 33', 63' Mitrovic A., 63' Schurrle A.; 18', 54' Armstrong S.
      Manchester Utd-Crystal Palace 0-0
      Tottenham-Chelsea 3-1 8' Alli D., Kane H., 54' Son Heung-Min; 85' Giroud O.
      Watford-Liverpool 0-3 67' Salah M., 76' Alexander-Arnold, 89' Firmino R.
      West Ham-Manchester City 0-4 11' Silva D., 19' Sterling R., 34', 90+3' Sane L.
      Wolves-Huddersfield 0-2 6', 74' Mooy A

      LaLiga - Matchweek 13

      Match Score Statistics
      Real Sociedad-Celta Vigo 2-1 37' Oyarzabal M., 47' Zurutuza D.; 82' Gomez M.
      Atheltic Bilbao-Getafe 1-1 67' Nolaskoain P.; 77' Mata J.
      Atlético Madrid-Barcelona 1-1 77' Costa D.; 90' Dembele O.
      Eibar-Real Madrid 3-0 16' Escalante G., 52' Enrich S., 57' Kike
      Espanyol-Girona 1-3 4', 6' Stuani C., 90' Doumbia; 74' Iglesias B.
      Huesca-Levante 2-2 23' Riveira C., 51' Etxeita X.; 45+1' Roger M., 74' Boateng E.
      Leganes-Alaves 1-0 42' En Nesyri Y.
      Sevilla-Valladolid 1-0 30' Silva An.
      Valencia-Rayo Vallecano 3-0 35', 61' Mina S., 76' Gameiro K.
      Villarreal-Betis 2-1 52' Moreno, 54' Chukwueze S.; 90' Lo Celso

      Serie A - Matchweek 13

      Match Score Statistics
      Cagliari-Torino 0-0
      Bologna-Fiorentina 0-0
      Empoli-Atalanta 3-2 42' La Gumina A., 77'(OG) Masiello A., 90+2' Silvestre M.; 33' Freuler R., 40' Heteboer H.
      Genoa-Cagliari 1-1 17'(Pen) Piatek K.; 8' Quagliarella F.
      Inter-Frosinone 3-0 10', 82' Keita B., 57' Martinez L.
      Juventus-Spal 2-0 29' Ronaldo C., 60' Mandzukic M.
      Lazio-AC Milan 1-1 90+4' Correa J.; 78'(OG) Wallace
      Napoli-Chievo 0-0
      Parma-Sassuolo 2-1 6' Gervinho, 25' Alves B.; 36'(Pen) Babacar K.
      Udinese-AS Roma 1-0 54' De Paul R.

      Bundesliga - Matchweek 12

      Match Score Statistics
      Augsburg-Eintracht Frankfurt 1-3 90' Cordova S.; 1' de Guzman J., 47' Haller S., 68' Rebic A.
      Bayer Leverkusen-Stuttgart 2-0 76', 83' Volland K.
      Bayern Munich-Dusseldorf 3-3 17' Sule N., 20', 58' Muller T.; 44', 77' 90+3' Lukebakio D.
      Borussia Monchengladbach-Hannover 4-1 7' Hazard T., 44' Lang M., 58' Stindl L., 77' Zakaria D.; 1' Wood B.
      Freiburg-Werder Bremen 1-1 42'(Pen) Waldschmidt G.; 90+2' Augustinsson L.
      Hertha Berlin-Hoffenheim 3-3 12' Ibisevic V., 71' Leckie M., 87' Lazaro V.; 1' Demirbay K., 10' Kramaric A.
      Mainz-Borussia Dortmund 1-2 70' Quaison R.; 66' Alcacer P., 76' Piszczek L.
      Schalke04-Nurnberg 5-2 26', 84' Skrzybski S., 32' Harit A., 70' Burgstaller G., 90+3' Oczipka B.; 38' Palacios-Martinez F., 78' Zrelak A.
      WolfsburgRB Leipzig 1-0 50' Roussillon J.

      Ligue 1 - Matchweek 14

      Match Score Statistics
      Amiens-Marseille 1-3 8' Dibassy B.; 26', 80', 90+1' Thauvin F.
      Caen-Monaco 0-1 55' Falcao
      Dijon-Bordeaux 0-0
      Lyon-Saint Etienne 1-0 62' Denayer J.
      Montpellier-Rennes 2-2 45+1', 49' Delort A.; 5' Ben Arfa H., 71'(Pen) Bourigeaud B.
      Nantes-Angers 1-1 89' Majeed W.; 5' Bahoken S.
      Nice-Lille 2-0 25' Cyprien W., 79' Saint-Maximin A.
      PSG-Toulouse 1-0 9' Cavani E.
      Reims-Guingamp 2-1 2' Chavalerin X., 68' Dia B., 81'(Pen) Thuram M.
      Strasbourg-Nimes 0-1 70' Lybohy H.
      5 votes
    5. This week in Anime: week 47 of 2018

      AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH I'm late, so very very late How do? Since we're currently lacking native spoiler tags, I'd ask all of you to follow this scheme: Post a top level...

      AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH I'm late, so very very late


      How do?

      Since we're currently lacking native spoiler tags, I'd ask all of you to follow this scheme:
      Post a top level comment with the title and episode number of the anime you want to talk about like this
      **JoJo's Bizarre Adventure: Vento Aureo - Episode 1**
      Then reply to those top level comments with your thoughts. This way people who haven't seen something yet or plan on binge watching once all the episodes are out can simply collapase the top level comment to not get spoiled ^.^

      What do?

      Simply post, discuss or joke about any currently airing anime you want. For Anime you've been watching that aren't currently airing refer to Cleb's weekly thread.

      When do?

      But what if the anime I want to talk about hasn't aired yet?

      No problem, just post a comment here once the episode has aired, these threads aren't meant to last one single day.


      Archive

      Archives of these threads can be found at the unofficial wiki

      5 votes
    6. What have you been listening to this week?

      What have you been listening to this week? You don't need to do a 6000 word review if you don't want to, but please write something! Feel free to give recs or discuss anything about each others'...

      What have you been listening to this week? You don't need to do a 6000 word review if you don't want to, but please write something!

      Feel free to give recs or discuss anything about each others' listening habits.

      You can make a chart if you use last.fm:

      http://www.tapmusic.net/lastfm/

      Remember that linking directly to your image will update with your future listening, make sure to reupload to somewhere like imgur if you'd like it to remain what you have at the time of posting.

      8 votes
    7. A layperson's introduction to Thermodynamics, part 3: Entropy and the heat death of the universe

      Intro Hello everyone, Today we cover entropy and the heat death of the universe. The previous chapters can be found here and here. While I recommend you read both, you should at least read the...

      Intro

      Hello everyone,

      Today we cover entropy and the heat death of the universe.

      The previous chapters can be found here and here. While I recommend you read both, you should at least read the first part and skim the second.

      A collection of all topics covered can be found here: https://tildes.net/~tildes/8al/.

      Subject

      Intro

      Entropy describes how chaotic a system is. In thermodynamics, chaos is created from an irreversible process. We are all sort of familiar with this concept. A broken cup will not unshatter itself. As a consequence of how our universe works, (net) chaos can only increase. And this might have far reaching consequence, if we look at the effects of entropy on a cosmic scale.

      Entropy

      Entropy describes an amount of irreversible chaos.

      But first, let's cover cycles super quickly. In thermodynamics, a very important concept is a "cycle". A cycle is a repeating process, that returns to its initial condition. For instance, when we ride a bike. We're turning our feet around the crank shaft. Repeatedly returning to the same position we started from. As we push on the pedal, some of our work is lost and turned into heat. Primarily due to friction from the wheels and from the different mechanical parts.

      A cycle that wastes no energy is called a reversible cycle. That would mean 100% of the work in a cycle (even the work that is turned to heat) has to be returned in some way to its original state. The most famous example of this is the Carnot heat engine.[1] But in reality, the Carnot heat engine is nothing more than a theoretical engine. As we remember from before, we cannot turn 100% of heat back into work. So any heat engine, be it a car's motor, a refrigerator, a star, or the human body, will in some way contribute to this irreversible chaos.

      Now what about entropy? If we look at entropy at the molecular level, it all becomes a bit abstract. But we can think of this concept with bigger building blocks than molecules, and still be close enough. Say you have a brick house with orderly layed bricks. This house would love to come crashing down. And lets imagine it does. When the house lays in ruins, it is not likely to suddenly "fall" into the shape of the house again. So if the house has collapsed, our system is in a higher state of chaos. Our entropy has increased. And unless we supply work to the system (and waste energy trough heat), we will not get the brick house back.

      So now we understand, that on the grand scale of the universe, entropy will only increase.

      The heat death of the universe

      But what are the consequences of this? Imagine entropy going on for billions and billions of years. Everything in the universe slowly reaching a higher state of chaos. Everything that is orderly, turns into chaos. All high quality energy has turned into low quality energy. Everything has been wasted and turned into heat. Everything ripped apart until you are left with nothing to rip apart. At this point, there is no interactions between molecules any more. Everything has reached absolute zero temperature.

      At this point, entropy is at its absolute maximum. And we have reached entropic equilibrium.

      This is the heat death of the universe.

      Afterword

      Of course, the heat death of the universe is just one of the many theories about the end of the universe. It assumes that thermodynamics properly describes the universe, and that there are no hidden surprises.

      Frankly told, it's the best bet we have with our current knowledge. But we still know so little. So I would not panic just yet. Alternatively, this is where we could continue with "an engineer's perspective on existensial nihilism". But I think that this is something better reserved for later, and better presented by someone else.

      We have covered what I consider the absolute minimum of thermodynamics, that still gives us a basic understanding of thermodynamics. There are of course a lot of other topics we could cover, but thats it for now. I will potentially write an appendix later with some questions or things that have been asked.

      But for now, that's it. Questions, feedback or otherwise?

      Notes

      [1] The Carnot heat cycle is a bit beyond the level of what we have discussed so far. It describes a system where heat is supplied and removed to have a piston expand and contract without any energy becoming waste heat.

      14 votes