-
27 votes
-
NASA tests new solar sail in low orbit. Could lead to more advanced space travel techniques!
13 votes -
US judge rules $400 million algorithmic system illegally denied thousands of people’s Medicaid benefits
27 votes -
Court: Section 230 doesn’t shield TikTok from blackout challenge death suit
25 votes -
AI makes racist judgement calls when asked to evaluate speakers of African American vernacular English
23 votes -
Office retreat gone awry: Worker rescued after allegedly left stranded on Colorado mountain by colleagues
38 votes -
US AI Safety Institute signs agreements regarding AI safety research, testing and evaluation with Anthropic and OpenAI
9 votes -
Mexico ‘pauses’ diplomatic relations with US and Canadian embassies
17 votes -
Annapurna and Remedy Entertainment announce partnership on Control 2, adapting Control and Alan Wake for film and TV
19 votes -
Las Vegas jail reports mpox case
15 votes -
Magdalena Bay - Imaginal Disk (full album, 2024)
12 votes -
Elon Musk’s lawyers quietly subpoena public interest groups
38 votes -
US Republicans are sneaking anti-trans amendments into beneficial bills
21 votes -
How anti-trans US policies in Project 2025 could impact all families
27 votes -
[Home networking] Setting my Ruckus APs to DFS channels manually, any chance of running afoul of the FCC?
Hi everyone, I recently finally setup the Ruckus AP unleased system that came with my townhome. After spending a long night learning how to properly configure the system I finally set it up in a...
Hi everyone, I recently finally setup the Ruckus AP unleased system that came with my townhome. After spending a long night learning how to properly configure the system I finally set it up in a way that provided me the best speeds/range without interference.
This was achieved by setting my Ruckus APs to manually sit on the DFS channels (60-140) via the Ruckus configuration app (shown here)
This has been working great as I'm avoiding the 10~ other wifi networks in the area that are all set to the standard 36-48 and 149-160 channels (wifi analyzer screenshot here) but I'm concerned I may be inadvertently violating FCC guidelines. Note I do not live near any military installations, but I am about 13 miles away from a major airport. Will the Ruckus APs automatically change channels if they detect radar interference or am I causing trouble for someone?
11 votes -
American teachers are burning out on the job
46 votes -
Blue and red US states were putting period products in schools — then came the anti-trans backlash
41 votes -
Death threats, legal risk and backlogs weigh on US clinicians treating trans minors
13 votes -
Social platform X edits AI chatbot after election officials warn that it spreads misinformation
15 votes -
Book review: "Escaping Gravity" by Lori Garver
7 votes -
Chinese government hackers penetrate US internet providers to spy
17 votes -
The GLP-1 compounding loophole
24 votes -
Apple rethinks its movie strategy after a string of misses
26 votes -
Megathread - Updates on the Donald Trump trial regarding classified documents
Things are starting to happen in this case also.
23 votes -
San Leandro tech startup to sell drones the size of several cars, flying 600 miles at a time
21 votes -
An American man has died in south Iceland after ice collapsed while he was on a group tour to a glacier
22 votes -
Small grocers feel squeezed by suppliers, and shoppers bear the pain
30 votes -
Weekly US politics news and updates thread - week of August 19
This thread is posted weekly - please try to post all relevant US political content in here, such as news, updates, opinion articles, etc. Extremely significant events may warrant a separate...
This thread is posted weekly - please try to post all relevant US political content in here, such as news, updates, opinion articles, etc. Extremely significant events may warrant a separate topic, but almost all should be posted in here.
This is an inherently political thread; please try to avoid antagonistic arguments and bickering matches. Comment threads that devolve into unproductive arguments may be removed so that the overall topic is able to continue.
17 votes -
Kamala Harris's speech killed any hope she would end the Gaza genocide
22 votes -
US judge rules Breonna Taylor’s boyfriend caused her death, dismisses some charges against ex-officers
64 votes -
Charly Bliss - Calling You Out (2024)
3 votes -
NASA decides to bring Starliner spacecraft back to Earth without crew | Crew to return on SpaceX Dragon Feb 2025
37 votes -
SpaceX to return Boeing's Starliner astronauts from space next year
14 votes -
The US DOJ files an antitrust suit against a software company for allegedly manipulating rent prices
46 votes -
How the North American box office achieved a remarkable U-turn this summer
4 votes -
MIT's drop in Black students shows fallout from top court ruling
33 votes -
Vesync voluntarily discontinues certain claims for HEPA air purifiers following challenge by Dyson
13 votes -
Anti-trans school board candidates backed by Ron DeSantis get crushed in Florida
58 votes -
New coronavirus vaccines are now approved
34 votes -
The US government spends millions to open grocery stores in food deserts. The real test is their survival.
35 votes -
Former US President Donald Trump’s post of fake Taylor Swift endorsement is his latest embrace of AI-generated images
36 votes -
Chick-Fil-A hatches plans for streaming service as reality TV comes home to roost
17 votes -
Read the Lewiston, Maine, mass shooting investigation final report
19 votes -
Disney seeking dismissal of Raglan Road death lawsuit because victim was Disney+ subscriber
111 votes -
Why your vet bill is so high
41 votes -
Oxygen Destroyer - Guardians of the Universe (2024)
7 votes -
How the rise of the camera launched a fight to protect Gilded Age Americans’ privacy
13 votes -
The can opener. Engineering to solve human fallibility. (Spoiler: It didn’t totally work.)
22 votes -
Phil Donahue, pioneering daytime TV talk show host, dead at 88
10 votes -
"You give out too many stars" (2008)
28 votes