-
9 votes
-
A Texas horned toad once survived thirty-one years in a time capsule
20 votes -
Thor Bjørklund's ostehøvel, a popular cheese slicer which developed into an important Norwegian export, celebrates 100 this year
21 votes -
Cheomseongdae: the oldest surviving astronomical observatory in East Asia
8 votes -
Mean World Syndrome - moderate to heavy exposure to violence-related content in mass media may cause people to perceive the world to be more dangerous than it is
36 votes -
WikiTok
53 votes -
US documents say Project 2025’s creators The Heritage Foundation want to dox Wikipedia’s volunteer editors of pages related to Palestine conflict using powerful tools
33 votes -
Highlighting text in Wikipedia scrolls up too fast?
To be honest I have some problems explaining what I mean, which might be why I can't find a solution or explanaition for it. I use firefox on Linux and out of habit i highlight text while reading...
To be honest I have some problems explaining what I mean, which might be why I can't find a solution or explanaition for it.
I use firefox on Linux and out of habit i highlight text while reading it. I always did that and it helps me to read a lot faster and to relax my eyes while reading. It's something i don't think i can get rid of, even if I tried, it's just so deeply burned in.
As well I use to scroll the text I'm reading to the top out of the same reasons or maybe it's just habit as well, but I realised I cannot get rid of it as well :-)So no to my problem:
Usually this works flawless, i can highlight text and have the cursor where I'm reading in the topmost visible line. But for some strange reason this does not work in the "new" wikipedia layout. where if I highlight text in the upper third of the page it scrolls upwards quite fast which just fucks up everything and makes my day bad. (this behaviour is not present in the old design which e.g. the germand wikipedia still uses)Is it me?
Is it my browser?
Is there a way to get rid of this, so I can keep my workflow while reading and learing on wikipedia? Is somebody else observing this behaviour?
Where can I even start to look for a solution? I don't even know what to look for.It truly bothers me, as I'm close to every day on it, and it might be my favorite website.
I heard there is a way to switch to the old wikipedia layout, which might be a workaround. But I actually like the new Layout a lot, so if there is a way to avoid that it would be great :-)18 votes -
US based The Heritage Foundation plans to ‘identify and target’ Wikipedia editors
81 votes -
1891 New Orleans lynchings
7 votes -
Wikipedia article blocked worldwide by Delhi high court
78 votes -
ADE 651
14 votes -
Epiousion
18 votes -
The editors protecting Wikipedia from AI hoaxes
18 votes -
US ultrarunner Camille Herron involved in Wikipedia controversy
19 votes -
International Talk Like A Pirate Day 2024
18 votes -
The glass door of Wikipedia’s notable people
10 votes -
Tune into the soulful sounds of someone making edits to a Wikipedia page
24 votes -
The Circassian genocide, Russian Empire's systematic mass murder, ethnic cleansing and expulsion of 95–97% of the Circassians, resulting in 1 to 1.5 million deaths during the Russo-Circassian War
26 votes -
In search of: audiobook versions of The Worst Witch series
3 votes -
In the Aftermath: Angels Never Sleep (1988)
3 votes -
Wikipedia’s mobile website finally gets a dark mode — here’s how to turn it on
27 votes -
Anti-Defamation League faces Wikipedia ban over reliability concerns on Israel, antisemitism
37 votes -
Wikipedia's Philosophy game: A breakdown, and how someone broke it
10 votes -
Wikipedia "AI" Chrome extension
19 votes -
The Abilene paradox
26 votes -
Active US Air Force serviceman self-immolates himself in front of the Embassy of Israel
36 votes -
Weird Wings: The Boeing YC-14 and the McDonnell Douglas YC-15
15 votes -
An archive of Wikipedia from Thursday, December 20, 2001
18 votes -
List of unusual units of measurement
14 votes -
The Curse on Showtime/Paramount+ (Nathan Fielder, Emma Stone, Bennie Safdie)
12 votes -
The Hofmann Wobble - Wikipedia and the problem of historical memory
6 votes -
What's your favorite Wikipedia page and why?
Personally, I like to check the South Park Controversies Page every now and then. The page on Quantum Entanglement is fascinating and has so many rabbit hole links that lead to other rabbit holes...
Personally, I like to check the South Park Controversies Page every now and then.
The page on Quantum Entanglement is fascinating and has so many rabbit hole links that lead to other rabbit holes themselves. I still go back and re-read them here and there to improve my understanding and check for laymen's updates without all pop-science nonsense you encounter elsewhere.
I'll come back and post a few more when I can think of them!
61 votes -
Opinions on stand up meetings
29 votes -
Vavilovian mimicry
10 votes -
How one man rewrote one thousand years of history
6 votes -
Wikipedia’s king who doesn’t exist
9 votes -
Fun fact: Taiwan claims exclusive sovereignty over mainland China and Mongolia as well as parts of Russia, India, Myanmar, Pakistan, Bhutan, Afghanistan, Tajikistan, and Japan
Decided not to post a single link as there are tons of different articles about different aspects of it on Wikipedia. It's a whole thing! Exclusive mandate - Republic of China (Taiwan) and...
Decided not to post a single link as there are tons of different articles about different aspects of it on Wikipedia. It's a whole thing!
-
Exclusive mandate - Republic of China (Taiwan) and People's Republic of China
-
1992 consensus which established semi-official dialogue between ROC and PRC
It seems like this is a leftover from the Chinese civil war and/or Chiang Kai-shek's authoritarian and murderous rule because one of the above articles does mention that these territorial hopes haven't been worked towards for many years:
Originally placing high priority on reclaiming the Chinese mainland through Project National Glory, the KMT now favors a closer relation with the PRC and seeks to maintain Taiwan's status quo under the Constitution of the Republic of China. The party also accepts the 1992 Consensus, which defines both sides of the Taiwan Strait as "one China" but maintains its ambiguity to different interpretations.
It goes further back than that though, probably to 1966 when Project National Glory was abandoned:
[invasion of mainland China] as the initial stage of reunification was effectively abandoned after 1966, although the Guoguang planning organization was not abolished until 1972. The ROC did not abandon the policy of using force for reunification until 1990.
Thought this was all quite interesting, so I wanted to share! It is not exactly light reading though so I also wanted to ask for documentary recommendations about this, and of the Chinese civil war in general, if anybody knows of any good ones?
Don't mind me, just finding myself going into a lot of Wikipedia rabbit holes lately 😊
22 votes -
-
Wikipedia:Dark mode
20 votes -
Too much ecological fallacy with health studies
13 votes -
There’s a new Studio Ghibli Miyazaki film coming out this week, and it’s intentionally launching with zero trailers/screencap
70 votes -
Is there a children's TV show in your country that is universally loved and became part of your country's culture?
43 votes -
Jugger is a team sport played with varied foam weapons
7 votes -
The famous Nuclear Gandhi glitch in Civilization is a hoax
52 votes -
Timeline of the far future
20 votes -
The Barbegal Aqueduct included a watermill complex with water cascading through a total of sixteen wheels. It may have been "the greatest known concentration of mechanical power in the ancient world"
13 votes -
The Initial Teaching Alphabet (ITA)
6 votes -
Making Reddit remove content with EU law vs using a script
14 votes -
Design notes on the 2023 Wikipedia redesign
9 votes -
US Supreme Court declines to hear Wikimedia Foundation’s challenge to National Security Agency mass surveillance
8 votes