-
38 votes
-
Presidential debate: Trump refuses to take part in virtual TV event
19 votes -
Cambridge Analytica did not misuse data in EU referendum, says UK watchdog
5 votes -
Post-politics and the future of the left
5 votes -
Teenage girl becomes Finland's PM for the day – Aava Murto is taking over for the day as part of a campaign for girls' digital rights
12 votes -
US President Donald Trump abruptly scraps stimulus talks, punting on economic relief until after Election Day
26 votes -
US House Democrats say Facebook, Amazon, Alphabet, Apple enjoy ‘monopoly power’ and recommend big changes
18 votes -
Joe Biden can end the drama on election night. All he has to do is win Texas.
13 votes -
Planning is GREAT: Britain was supposed to be the most prepared country in the world. Then an unexpected enemy arrived
6 votes -
US President Donald Trump and first lady Melania have tested positive for coronavirus
85 votes -
Should we use a megathread for US election news as we get closer to Nov 3?
I was thinking about how much the quantity of election news is likely to increase as we get closer to Nov 3. And more specifically the likelihood that this election will not be clear cut, will be...
I was thinking about how much the quantity of election news is likely to increase as we get closer to Nov 3. And more specifically the likelihood that this election will not be clear cut, will be contested, lawsuits filed, etc in the days and weeks after Nov 3.
With that in mind, do we want to proactively put up a weekly (maybe daily for the actual week of) megathread to consolidate some of it?
18 votes -
Michigan Attorney General will no longer enforce governor’s executive orders after court ruling
11 votes -
Weird Al - We're All Doomed
20 votes -
Time to pardon Edward Snowden?
14 votes -
Tracker for coronavirus test results from officials in the US government and presidential campaigns
21 votes -
History of US political parties (part 1)
5 votes -
Is political violence ever justifiable?
5 votes -
The Turkish century; Part 3: New beginnings
6 votes -
The non-voter
12 votes -
Postal Service workers quietly resist DeJoy’s changes with eye on election
16 votes -
What academics can do now to prevent a coup later
5 votes -
Trump campaign is reportedly plotting an election coup to “bypass” a Biden win
28 votes -
DeJoy tells judge mail-sorting machines can’t be reassembled
11 votes -
Sensory overload and annals of lying
3 votes -
President Trump is continuing his war on Section 230 and the right for the open internet to exist
8 votes -
Trump won’t commit to ‘peaceful’ post-election transfer of power
9 votes -
Can anyone help me narrow down the definition of "gaslighting" to better make sense of it as a concept?
I read the Wikipedia article about "gaslighting" and know it comes from a 1944 film of the same name in which an abusive husband gradually dims the gaslights at home – while denying doing so – to...
I read the Wikipedia article about "gaslighting" and know it comes from a 1944 film of the same name in which an abusive husband gradually dims the gaslights at home – while denying doing so – to drive his wife mad.
Yet whenever I see the term used (which happens a lot, lately) I can't make the connection. It seems people use it for the simple act of lying or denying something, which to me is mostly just... lying, not "gaslighting". Any kind of stupid, misguided act is getting the sinister "gaslighting" stamp as if it some 5d chess move when it simply looks like incompetence. The core principle of it seems to revolve around having a plan to psychologically manipulate someone but I mostly don't see the plan nor the actual goal. If anything untruthful you say about an important topic is "gaslighting", then the term doesn't seem to have a lot of value on its own. Wikipedia actually mentions "unconscious" gaslighting which seems to contradict its purpose of actually wanting to manipulate someone.
So, given its popularity, I'm curious if there might be a (succinct) definition of the term that helps me understand it properly? Do you think it's just a trendy term to throw at politicians doing shit you don't like? Am I missing an important detail?
17 votes -
Viral hate, election interference, and hacked accounts: Inside the tech industry’s decades-long failure to reckon with risk
8 votes -
The supply of disinformation will soon be infinite: Disinformation campaigns used to require a lot of human effort to be effective, but now artificial intelligence could take them to a whole new level
9 votes -
Thomas Frank on the podcast "Useful Idiots"
3 votes -
Donald Trump accused of sexual assault by former model Amy Dorris
17 votes -
Court blocks Trump’s WeChat ban from taking effect today
17 votes -
The FinCen Files: Thousands of secret suspicious activity reports offer a picture of corruption and complicity - and how the government lets it flourish
11 votes -
Monterey bans gas leaf blowers in residential areas
14 votes -
The FBI, the second Red scare, and the folk singer who cooperated
6 votes -
With violent crime on the rise, Minneapolis City Council asks: Where are the police?
5 votes -
The country’s most important climate election is happening in Texas
8 votes -
How to think about the deficit by James Tobin
6 votes -
6,600-word internal memo from a fired Facebook data scientist details how the social network knew leaders of countries around the world were using the site to manipulate voters — and failed to act
21 votes -
Why don't we just ban the buying, selling, and merging of companies?
With the ever-growing stream of acquisitions and mergers, it got me thinking: Why do we permit companies to do this? What would the harm be in banning this practice? If a company is becomes...
With the ever-growing stream of acquisitions and mergers, it got me thinking: Why do we permit companies to do this?
What would the harm be in banning this practice? If a company is becomes insolvent, release all of it's IP to the public domain, dissolve all patents/trademarks, and sell off physical assets to pay debtors (first of which should be former employees IMO, but that's a separate discussion).
Edit: I think my original intention of the post to kick off some interesting discussion has worked. Thank you to all current and future posters!
16 votes -
"We have capitalism for the poor and socialism for the rich" - Mark Blyth
13 votes -
Woodward book: Trump says he knew coronavirus was ‘deadly’ and worse than the flu while intentionally misleading Americans
30 votes -
Effective political giving
11 votes -
LVMH backs out of $16.2 billion acquisition of Tiffany, citing US threats of tariffs on French goods. Tiffany has filed a lawsuit to enforce the agreement
6 votes -
People who live near the most toxic sites in America say they saw a level of attention they hadn't seen in decades under Donald Trump
18 votes -
When fascism was American; Using religion, anticommunism and xenophobia, "Father" Charles Coughlin popularized fascism in 1930s America, not too unlike Donald Trump today
8 votes -
Denmark's left-leaning parties have agreed to change the country's sexual violence laws to allow sex without explicit consent to be prosecuted as rape
21 votes -
Academics are really, really worried about their freedom
27 votes -
Uber is hurting drivers like me in its legal fight in California
3 votes -
Brazil hands out so much Covid cash that poverty nears a low
9 votes