-
4 votes
-
Periphery - Reptile (2019)
4 votes -
They had it coming - The parents indicted in the college-admissions scandal were responding to a changing America, with rage at being robbed of what they believed was rightfully theirs
12 votes -
The illusion of a “marketplace of ideas” and the right to truth
8 votes -
Stop Asking Kids What They Want To Be When They Grow Up
27 votes -
Moral circle expansion: How humanity’s idea of who deserves moral concern has grown — and will keep growing
9 votes -
ELUVEITIE - Ategnatos
5 votes -
Millions of Facebook records were exposed on public Amazon server
14 votes -
New plan would return California condors to northwest skies
7 votes -
The Alliance of American Football has failed spectacularly, of course
10 votes -
‘It’s genuine, you know?’: Why the online influencer industry is going ‘authentic’
8 votes -
Plants and birds need privacy online, too
9 votes -
Why 'Worthless' Humanities Degrees May Set You Up For Life
20 votes -
Promare | Teaser trailer
4 votes -
Making fluid and powerful animations for Skullgirls
5 votes -
The irrationality of Alcoholics Anonymous
19 votes -
Strange bug clicking comments url on posts
Issue is occurring on iPhone 7 using Firefox mobile browser v15.1 but has occurred on previous versions of Firefox. When I try to click the link to view comments, the post grows in size seemingly...
Issue is occurring on iPhone 7 using Firefox mobile browser v15.1 but has occurred on previous versions of Firefox.
When I try to click the link to view comments, the post grows in size seemingly indefinitely (eventually either the link works and redirects or I get frustrated and scroll to the next post). This has happened a few times. As far as I can tell it is seemingly random.
https://m.imgur.com/8HHIvtl
https://m.imgur.com/rhiA30ySorry if this is the wrong place to post this. Still trying to get use to the proper place to put things. If you need any more details let me know.
9 votes -
Welcome to the prude internet: No more sex talk allowed
32 votes -
I’ve been a lesbian my entire life, but I only realized I was a woman this year
21 votes -
James Patterson donates $1.25 million to classroom libraries
9 votes -
Red Bull Music Academy and Radio to shut down
7 votes -
Creating the Innocent Killer: Ender's Game, Intention, and Morality
13 votes -
Why these six baseball teams still won't let you watch their games online
8 votes -
A brief history of the ball pit
7 votes -
How US recycling is changing now that China won’t take it
11 votes -
Moving into software defined networking and devops? Here's the skills you need and how to acquire them
5 votes -
Your very public Amazon shopping history is a window onto your soul
11 votes -
Differentiating between comments collapsed via noise versus user-actioned & old collapses
Quick thought. Is there currently a purely visual way of distinguishing the rationale for why a comment is collapsed? It seems to me at the moment there's three distinct ways a comment can take on...
Quick thought. Is there currently a purely visual way of distinguishing the rationale for why a comment is collapsed? It seems to me at the moment there's three distinct ways a comment can take on a collapsed property:
-
The user actively collapsed the comment while scrolling through the topic. This type of collapse is transient, and is neither persisted on the Tildes server, or in the browser, after the users leaves the page.
-
The comment was collapsed via the "negative weighting" heuristic as the community applied noise/joke tags to the comment. This is permanent, until presumably the comment gains enough votes to exceed any negative weighting causing its collapse.
-
Thirdly, the comment can be collapsed because the user has enabled "collapse old comments" in https://tildes.net/settings/comment_visits. Once a user visits a thread, any comments that existed at the last visit to the thread will be collapsed on any subsequent visits to the thread.
Is there any visual way of distinguishing a user-collapsed comment from a community-collapsed comment currently? And if not, should there be one? Perhaps by making the collapsed text slightly more translucent? I'm actually looking to contribute to the Tildes source code in some small way, so this would potentially be an interesting shoehorn for that.
26 votes -
-
The man arrested in relation to the Christchurch terror attacks will face fifty murder charges and thirty-nine attempted murder charges
17 votes -
Oh no! The depressing truth about the Willy Wonka Chocolate Factory workers
9 votes -
The metabolic adaptation manual: Problems, solutions, and life after weight loss
6 votes -
Can bacteria help us prevent salt damage to concrete roads and bridges?
4 votes -
Learn to use email with git
11 votes -
Why there's so little left of the early internet
2 votes -
Indonesia’s Muslim youth find new heroes in Instagram preachers
3 votes -
The post-Columbine question remains the same: Can school shootings be prevented?
5 votes -
Metamorphic Testing
5 votes -
FTC hits "predatory" scientific publisher with a $50 million fine
13 votes -
NFL - Instant Replay for Pass Interference
9 votes -
EU lawmakers voted to scrap daylight saving time starting in 2021
10 votes -
Sea Wolf - Cedarsmoke (2014)
4 votes -
Risk of Rain 2 | EA launch trailer
5 votes -
The chair of the House Ways and Means Committee has officially demanded Trump’s tax returns from the past six years
14 votes -
How Rupert Murdoch's empire of influence remade the world - a three part report covering the UK, Australia and the USA
19 votes -
Joker | Teaser trailer
18 votes -
Let's talk about titles
A recent thread has had its title changed due to the title being sensationalized. I'm not sure that this is the correct move, as the title in question was also the title of the submitted article....
A recent thread has had its title changed due to the title being sensationalized. I'm not sure that this is the correct move, as the title in question was also the title of the submitted article. I think this does a disservice to the community as a whole, as it makes it appear as though we want to editorialize the content submitted here which seems to go against the ideal of fostering quality discussion.
"But wait!", I hear you say, "We have a topic log!" That will be ignored, easily, especially by those seeking to equate the community with something else. While we're busy misrepresenting content (because that's what changing a title does, it misrepresents), others will point at us and shout about how we're misrepresenting the content being posted. I cannot agree with this, and I think its detrimental to the community and the idea of Tildes as a whole. Note: Text-only posts obviously are excluded from this, I'm concerned with titles on submitted links that have their own title.
Now, what happens when the title of an article is already sensationalist and editorialized? The authors, editor, and publisher obviously have biases and platforms they want to support. It currently seems as though we are changing titles to something different than what the title of the article is, and I find this extremely off-putting. I can understand wanting to avoid bringing that bias over to Tildes, but I cannot understand a reason to deliberately misrepresent that bias by changing an article's title. I think this is going to be detrimental to the community and the mission of Tildes to generate high-quality discussion.
Where articles with sensationalized headlines are posted, I propose that we must retain those titles. The system of tagging is sufficient to indicate that a title is too strongly sensationalized. Deviating from this norm is antithetical with Tildes' mission to generate and foster quality content and discussion.
There are too many responses to really get into things individually, but I must say I feel as though there has been a breach of trust. I had no idea that altering the titles of submissions would go so far, and it has destroyed the image I had of the site. Maybe the site will evolve more as the experiment continues, who knows. In the meantime, I've been accused of making arguments in bad faith multiple times in this thread. I'm deeply offended by this, as I've tried to present my thoughts and feelings as clearly as I could. This is deeply troubling to me, especially since those accusations have been given strong support by other users.
unless we stopped editing titles
This is a misrepresentation, I only ask that titles match the article they're from. Edit away if the title doesn't match the article, or is a user's text post. Maybe I wasn't clear, but there it is spelled out.
Also, there was never an ultimatum, but Deimos and other users would smear me with such claims. Being unsure of whether or not a community is a good fit for yourself is not nearly the same thing as an ultimatum.
32 votes -
When giant scorpions swarmed the seas
13 votes -
How Banksy authenticates his work
20 votes -
Heaven or high water - Selling Miami's last fifty years
4 votes -
Heaven or high water—Selling Miami's last fifty years
16 votes