Tildes Book Club discussion - March 2025 - Hyperion by Dan Simmons
This is the twelfth of an ongoing series of book discussions here on Tildes. We are discussing Hyperion by Dan Simmons. Our next book will be Elder Race by Adrian Tchaikovsky at the end of April.
I don't have a particular format in mind for this discussion, but I will post some prompts and questions as comments to get things started. You're not obligated to respond to them or vote on them though. So feel free to make your own top-level comment for whatever you wish to discuss, questions you have of others, or even just to post a review of the book you have written yourself. Also, this month will be slightly different. I have been exceptionally busy and didn't finish the book this time. I am hoping that you all who did read it will come up with interesting questions in addition to your comments/ reviews.
For latecomers, don't worry if you didn't read the book in time for this Discussion topic. You can always join in once you finish it. Tildes Activity sort, and "Collapse old comments" feature should keep the topic going for as long as people are still replying.
And for anyone uninterested in this topic please use the Ignore Topic feature on this so it doesn't keep popping up in your Activity sort, since it's likely to keep doing that while I set this discussion up, and once people start joining in.
My thoughts are going to be very late this month as I've only just started the book on Thursday. I finally finished off my previous series though, so I see no more roadblocks along the way.
I'm actually very excited to read Hyperion, and to discuss it with all of you in the near-future. Save some discussion topics for me!
I've finished the book now, and my god, I loved it. I wish it hadn't taken me so long so I could've participated with the rest of you, but I'll share my thoughts here, and in a few loose comments below.
I'll start by saying that I really liked the framing device of this book. Having a story take place in the "present" still allowed for ongoing tension, while plenty of room was given to each individual tale to explain how we got to this point in the first place.
In the beginning, Simmons really throws a lot of unknown words and concepts at you: the Hegemony, a hegira, time debt, farcasting, fat lines, the All Thing. It makes for an overwhelming intro, but it also gives you the sense of being dropped into a real and fleshed-out world. The details begin to reveal themselves as we delve into each individual story, and by the end, we feel like we have a stronger (even privileged) understanding of the inner workings of this society.
@Idalium made a great point that each story feels like the most important one as you read them: I mean, becoming immortal? Gaining the ability to manipulate time? Writing humanity's future? Uncovering a super-intelligent AI plot? Double-crossing two major factions of humanity? I just kept thinking, "How can they top that?".
Every revelation informed your understanding of the different worlds, factions, and complex motivations that govern them. Each character was flawed in their own way, but had logical motivations that made sense within their own context. Each story had a unique feel and theme, and yet all of them were enthralling and consequential in their own way.
If I had to pick though, I think my two favourites were The Priest's Tale, and The Scholar's Tale. The former was an incredibly strong opening story, matching our own naivety of this unknown planet, while showing the brutality that Hyperion is capable of. Duré, crucifying himself as Christ to break the binding chains of immortality -- I mean, wow, that's powerful imagery.
Weintraub's tale was also deeply moving, and far more personal than I was expecting. His story had me hooked from the beginning, as we already knew his daughter as an infant, and yet his tale begins with her growing into adulthood. Some really fantastic foreshadowing.
I'm not a student of religion, but even I could pick up on some of the themes of Jewish persecution and hardship it contained. I enjoyed the moral philosophizing, the interpretation of Abraham's dilemma, and his attempts to grapple with this impossible situation despite all of his scholarly training. It felt like he was being put to the ultimate test.
The religious themes were heavy throughout much of the book, yet they always felt appropriate and respectful. I actually think it's interesting that religion plays such a common role in scifi. In The Expanse, Mormonism grows to become a powerful political force. And as mentioned elsewhere in this thread, in Dune, Judaism manages to last for tens of thousands of years into our future.
This feels like a useful way of grounding a scifi story, and making it feel more directly connected to us. And unlike some older stories that describe the future as purely secular, it actually feels like a more realistic view that pockets of religion will continue to exist in some form, even if the beliefs and doctrine undergo change over time.
I was reminded of Dune in other ways, such as the multi-layered political intrigue of different houses and factions. Everybody is working towards their own ends, and there's no clear good guys or bad guys.
I was also reminded of Pandora's Star, largely by the focus on teleport technology, and the advanced yet unknowable AI that prefers to live just on the periphery of human civilization.
Towards the end of Hyperion, while I felt it moved a little too quickly, the Consul's Tale served well the bookend the overall story. I really liked the nautical theme, and the language usage helped support that feeling. For example, Siri would often refer to Merin as a sailor or shipman. We readers understand that his "ship" is a spaceship, but it helped sell the nautical fiction.
The tale also had strong condemnation of colonialism, and after reading Born a Crime in February, that resonated with me a lot deeper. While the author described Maui-Covenant, I kept picturing the inhabitants of South Africa being met by these strangers in their advanced ships, making all sorts of promises. With that context, I found it a lot easier to understand Merin's decision to destroy the farcaster and incite a rebellion, even if it only bought them a few more years of independence.
I enjoyed the twin-narrative of this story, and felt it mirrored the separate time streams that Merin and Siri experienced. The contrast between the two time periods also helped sell just how difficult time dilation can be on people. Months for him would be years or decades for her, and yet they still tried to make the relationship work.
While I had already suspected the consul of being the traitor, I enjoyed his perspective as an unreliable narrator. Or perhaps a not-completely-forthcoming narrator would be more accurate. I had already found him a little eerie towards the beginning, in how he coolly confronted Father Hoyt to get the full story out of him, and his reluctance to share his own tale. But it all clicked into place when he told his story, and I realized that even here, he was only a traitor from the perspective of the Hegemony. He was still doing what he thought was right.
As for the ending, while I admit I would have liked to know how it all played out once the pilgrims reached the Time Tombs, I expect that will be explored more in the sequels. There's still a lot of unanswered questions, like what the TechnoCore are planning, what role Lamia's pregnancy will play, and what happened to Het Masteen. The templars actually felt like the one area of the universe that we know very little about, so I'd like to learn more about them.
Hyperion is a masterful book, and I'll definitely be reading further into this series. I don't know exactly how I'll balance it around our current schedule, but since I'm already behind I'll likely end up skipping a month or two to get back on track. I do plan to read Elder Race though, both because it's so short, and because I think I'll really enjoy it.
Same with the lateness! I bought it during the sale someone alerted us to, but life absconded with my reading time (for text) the last couple of weeks. I'm at 4%.
Thirded, I hit a wall in my reading where I could only get through absolute popcorn. Mental health, who needs it.
I'm about 30% in now though.
I might be joining you for that late discussion lol. Fortunately the Tschaikovsky book Elder Race is short.
I'm just past 50 percent.
This book is full of religious references and themes. It's not just the priests tale. Hegira is from Islam. There are references to Jewish scriptures.
Yeah it's really layered.
I'll definitely be late this month. I'm more than 50% done though! Hoping to finish up tomorrow or Tuesday and I look forward to rezzing this thread.
What did you think about the structure of the book? Why would Simmons organize it that way?
I believe it’s supposed to similar in structure to The Canterbury Tales.
Honestly, I think Simmons had the idea for the frame story, thought it sounded brilliant in theory, but had to realize that it was way less practical to pull off. I personally felt like he started to drop the structure almost halfway through Hyperion. I know he "officially" abandoned it for the 2nd, though.
Ping @maximum_bake, @RheingoldRiver, @carsonc, @kwyjibo, @syllo, @kfwyre, @PnkNBlck71817, @rosco, @first-must-burn, @CannibalisticApple, @public, @DefinitelyNotAFae, @Melvincible, @davek804, @slothywaffle, @Bifrost51, @skybrian @Sodliddesu, @azaadi @fraughtGYRE @Nsutdwa @PnkNBlck71817 @chocobean @lackofaname, @OnlyGhosts @csos95 @Wes, @cfabbro, @georgeboff @Everdoor, @zorind @Palimpsest @CrazyProfessor02 @maevens @cdb @OceanBreezy @joshs, @Schnupfenheld @Sparksbet @Smores @Captain_calico @hexagonsun @CharlieBeans @pu1pfriction @Lonan @DialecticCake @kej @LazarWolf @eyechoirs @Thales, @Idalium @611828750722 @jawedzebra
@Rudism @crespyl @rsl12 @thermopesos @archevel, @elight, @pekt, @tonestones @Dr_Amazing
@Shevanel , @crialpaca @Weldawadyathink,@blivet ,@syllo, @lhamil64, @tanglisha, @requirement
I just finished reading the Fall of Hyperion and I am somewhat awestruck at the combination of these two books.
I have some of the humanities chops needed to follow the references to poetry and to various strands of religious thought, but the story carries the reader with intrigue and tension and war without needing to appreciate any of the easter eggs this erudite author casually weaves into the story.
I would imagine that the science he uses to build these clashing civilizations is likewise carefully studied and well informed.
If the book club wanted to read this together I would be happy with that outcome, but regardless, I highly recommend The Fall of Hyperion.
I really liked Fall of Hyperion as well, I felt it did “conclude” the story nicely.
I think I liked Hyperion itself more, but Hyperion left me wanting to know more about the world - and Fall gave me answers to (a lot) of those lingering worldbuilding questions. Though I didn’t necessarily feel all of those answers were satisfying, but I was likely missing quite a bit of the allegories. I think I also rushed through it a bit more than Hyperion, and that probably didn’t help.
Overall, I liked Hyperion itself more, but it felt a bit incomplete…but then I didn’t feel that Fall stuck the landing as much as I wanted it to (although I did still enjoy reading it).
That's interesting because I think I preferred Fall of Hyperion. Hyperion was a slower read for me. I enjoyed some but not all of the back stories to the pilgrim characters.
I took a long time to finish Hyperion, but I thought it was excellent. I really appreciated the precise use of language and the imaginative work it took to show the complex world views of the characters, each different from the other. This book was brilliant.
I appreciated the various types of stories told by the different pilgrims. The priest's tale sticks in my mind for the horror and the contact with the tribal society. The Consul's tale was fascinating to me for the intrigue and the double and triple levels of betrayal. Also dolphins. The story with the jewish character was tragic (even if the 'curse' ends up being lifted in the sequel). Making the poet a murderous drunk was an interesting choice but I didn't end up caring much about him or his story.
Adding a frame narrative made this book easier to appreciate than Cloud Atlas, but I think these two books are meant to do similar things and to showcase the authors' abilities to write in different styles with different themes and voices.
I just finished as well! I read the first prologue & first two chapters about a month ago, then the third one a few weeks back.
Then read the fourth chapter through the end today, hah.
I found the frame narrative pretty compelling, and I really liked getting to discover how each pilgrims story “fit” into it. I think the structure also made it easy for me to both put down, and pick back up again. I have a bad habit of a) finishing books in one sitting, ignoring all of my responsibilities until I am done; and b) not picking things back up if I put them down. So I was a bit surprised at how this book honestly made me /want/ to put it down after finishing a chapter to let it sit (even if it was just for 10 minutes to take a walk/breather), and how even after letting it sit for 3 weeks wanting to come back to it.
I don’t even know if I have a “least favorite” tale, I thoroughly liked all of them, or at least liked them enough.
The priests was an extremely strong start, and did a lot of worldbuilding work to set the scene for how weird the story was going to get.
Sol’s was absolutely heart wrenching.
I found the AI bits of Lamia’s story to be really interesting, and I am a sucker for noirs (even though some of the reveals came a bit out of nowhere to me).
Definitely one of the few books where I found myself glad I had added an easy dictionary look-up on my kobo, and one where I had to go back and re-read paragraphs that my brain kind of glazed over.
I will definitely be reading the sequel…but not sure when I’ll get around to it.
Which story did you relate to most or find the most interesting?
The Scholar’s Tale is one of the few examples of written word that has brought me to tears. I’m sure a lot of it has to do with me recently having a child, but it was utterly heartbreaking.
Agreed, the Scholar’s tale was moving and fascinating and gut-wrenching. I also enjoyed the discussion of Abraham’s Dilemma quite a lot.
I really liked Father Dure’s story as well. I’m glad it was the first — it was very engaging and felt well an truly alien and bizarre.
I absolutely loved the Poet's story. It was hilarious and tragic at just the right place in the story to lighten the mood... Once you look past the ridiculous slavery and body horror imagery. I also felt this story really added to the world building, highlighting both ends of society - the stupid rich and the abject poor. It also highlights how culture moves throughout the galactic society and the machinations of politics, both of which I found quite interesting.
This is one of the best, if not the best, books I have ever read. It's thought provoking, hilarious, tear jerking, horrifying, and fascinating. It's a fairly slow book, but I feel that the world building makes up for it tenfold.
If you are at all a fan of sci-fi, this is a must read IMO. FYI, my other favorite books/series are Foundation, Dune, and Pandora's Star, in case you want to compare.
I will say that the ending of this book is a cliffhanger. This and the sequel (Fall of Hyperion) were intended to be a single book, but the publisher wanted it as two books. The second book is worth a read, but it is definitely a different vibe and isn't as good imo. If Hyperion is a 10, Fall is a 7. It lacks the emotional highs and trades it for big decisions that affect the plot (and the galaxy).
Finally finished! Left most of my thoughts as a reply above, but but felt this bit could maybe stand alone-
I'm loving the book, my first thought was that it might not be my thing when it feels so connected to religion, but all the religions are handled with a lot of touch and respect while being relevant to the story.
Most of the stories are so captivating that I can't put the book down, it really hooks you up with the format, telling a story that connects with the others with the caveat that is not yet completed after narrating it to the rest of the group works wonderful.
The world building and variety in how the characters lives their lives is very coherent and not forced in any way, after reading around 60% there's still so many questions which I'm rotting to have answers.
Also, incredible how the poet predicts AI slop:
Thanks for bringing it to the book club, I look forward to discovering more books like this.
@Rheingoldriver, nominated it. @Wes and @carsonc enthusiastically supported the nomination.
I also thought it was excellent. We will have more nominations and voting this summer.
I'm completely embarrassed by how far behind I am, but I'm still reading it! And so far, I think it's excellent! I've enjoyed every story so far.
Looking forward to digging into this discussion properly once I've finished.
I finished the book a couple of days ago, I have to say it was a worth read, the ending let me down with the complete change of tone into The Wizard of Oz and leaving all questions unanswered, while I like to read more about this universe it's a big punch to take that none of the stories are finished unless I read another book, which I will definitely read, thankfully the Consul's story added tons of depth to this universe, I want to know much more about the Ousters now.
I enjoyed mostly all the stories, they all had something special that in itself could have been its own book.
My favorite still remains Father's Hoyt, or maybe I should say Father Duré, incredibly how captivating the Bikura way of living was, the twists in the Consul's story, the tragic story of Sol's daughter, how the AI have their own way of life were also amazing.
What I didn't enjoy as much, was Kassad's horniness, the "kill your enemies and have sex next to their corpses" felt like a teenage fantasy and his story was probably my least favorite for this exact reason basically an action movie and his character had not much depth, I do not have any problem with other sexual parts in the book for example the poet was hilarious when he talks about it, maybe I just consider the stories had more value than what the romantic parts wanted to add with Lamia's love at first sight or hearing about Siris's buttocks for the fifth time.
I don't want to complain much more, the book it's really high up in my ranking and I will recommend it to anyone who loves Sci-fi.
I agree with you about Kassad's story, though I took it more as an illustration that the bloodlust had risen within him to an almost inhuman level, as influenced by the Shrike. He'd been manipulated from early in his career to position him to kick off an intergalactic war, and it's possible that involved both mental and physiological changes.
Or perhaps it was just the Shrike using its future-knowledge to pick the horniest, most easily manipulable cadet in the fleet to orchestrate its plans with. Moneta was implanted into the virtual reality simulations to guide him on his path.
This actually makes me realize something I previously missed. Moneta's appearance may be evidence that the Shrike has, or will have, some connection to the TechnoCore, as they maintain the VR constructs. Though this only raises further questions as to its original purpose and creation.
Would you like to be added to the ping list for book club?
Pings happen approximately twice per month.
I'm new here, does it mean I'm notified when there's a new book club post?
In that case yes
It does. Adding your username.
What question would you like to ask other readers of Hyperion?
In general, I’m opposed to film/TV adaptations because they tend to be a letdown. That said, this book is begging for a limited Netflix series IMO, with a different director for each pilgrim, and a different style of film direction for each story (think Love, Death & Robots but not necessarily fully animated). So, with that context in mind, two potential questions (answer either or both):
how would my fellow book club members choose to approach the film style or direction of each pilgrim’s story?
(less important but still fun) who would you cast in any given role in this limited series? Or whose voice would you use for any non-live action episodes?
Great question. My thoughts turned first to The Fifth Element, so I guess Luc Besson would have to be involved. In thinking about it, there seemed to be some common strains with The Fifth Element: Korben as the soldier, Vito as the priest, Leeloo as the soldiers daughter, even Ruby Rhod as the poet.
Hyperion and Fall of Hyperion are so closely linked that they would need to be made by the same director, but I think some unconventional choices would be called for.
Martin Silenus: Eli Roth. I'm not a fan of horror, but it is an inescapable part of Martin's journey, particularly the body horror satyr and murder parts.
Lennar Hoyt: Jean-Pierre Jeunet. Might seem a little wacky for the story, but this whole part is crazy and the Jeunet penchant for over-the-top cinema would work well here. Also, the man already directed Alien Resurrection, which sounds a lot like Bikura to me.
Sol Weintraub: Werner Herzog. I really can't imagine Sol's story as a movie without also hearing Herzog's German-accented narration describing the events of his life. Maybe because there is something sad long the lines of Little Dieter Needs to Fly in Sol's story.
Fedmahn Kassad: Kathryn Bigelow. Many, many directors could make this one. Spielberg (Saving Private Ryan), Herzog (again, Rescue Dawn), Besson (again, La Femme Nikita) and others come to mind, but Bigelow's touch on Zero Dark Thirty, Hurt Locker, and K-19: The Widowmaker seal the deal on Kassad's story.
Brawne Lamia: David Lynch (RIP 😔). Brawne's story needs a whole lot of film noir, but I think Lynch would have done it the greatest service. He could have combined elements from Twin Peaks and Mulholland Drive with the knack for Scifi that shows up in Dune.
The consul: Park Chan-wook. The tragic failed revenge arc in the consul's story would be great in Park's hands, as Oldboy comes to mind.
Het Masteen: Terrence Malick. I think Malick would be perfect to convey the time-bending nature of Masteen's narrative, with prophesies and visions blending in with "present" and "past" events, as well as portraying the events of the Mobius Cube and the "celebrants". Possibly Christopher Nolan, though too, but I think something that resembles the Tree of Life (i.e. Yggdrasill) is more apt.
There it is. I hit all seven of them.
Thanks for humoring me with an incredible response! Lynch for Lamia’s story and Chan-wook for the consul are particularly inspired IMO. My one (sub-par) addition is that I could also see Kassad’s story as one of the few that would be very fun for an over-the-top animated feature, perhaps in the style of a western anime like Edgerunners, though per your point, his is the most straightforward of the bunch and would not be too tough to do justice in several different flavors.
The real bonus from your reply is that now I have several directors (nearly everyone else you mentioned outside of Bigelow and Roth) whose work I clearly need to check out more!
Wondering if anyone got the irony of the detective's story, I couldn't figure it out.
But the detective? What was up there? It just seemed so straightforward?
You could argue that her client’s already dead, so she’s failed from the beginning to give him any sort of closure. It’s a little reductive and strips all nuance from it, but that’s all that comes to mind. Her narrative thread plays an especially large part in the sequel (they all do, but especially hers) so maybe there’s something there and I’m not putting the pieces together quite yet. It’s been a little bit since I’ve read the second book.
I thought this was a very interesting observation.
I hadn't considered it before, but maybe it wasn't so much Lamia's irony, but Johnny's. He seeks help out of fear and confusion, not knowing who he can trust. In the end, he learns that he was the threat feared by the TechnoCore. An aberrant AI, a rogue experiment, which threatens the core's very ideology. His existence inflames tensions between its various sects, and so he's hunted out of fear.
It's actually an interesting parallel to how the Hegemony hunts down any predators on the worlds they colonize, to ensure that nothing can ever stand against them. The core is going through the same process here, with the open question of if they view humanity in the same light.
ohh, interesting, that does make sense!
This is maybe answered in the sequel, but I was wondering what people thought off Het Masteen.
I was disappointed we didn’t get his tale, because I found the templars and the world tree (and treeships) concept to be very interesting.
This book is an experience beyond just entertainment. I read Hyperion and its sequels a while ago, and I often think about them.
I think the 'Canterbury Tales' format works well for a number of reasons. Hyperion's plot is complex, featuring multifaceted characters with interweaving storylines; not to mention time-travel. Despite this, the story is never confusing. There is plenty of mystery and suspense, but since we follow one character at a time, it's easy to follow the narrative as intended.
Hyperion does not have a clear 'main character'. The pilgrims are not all good (or even likeable) people, but they are interesting, and I was invested in each of their fascinating stories. I never felt stuck in a side-plot; each pilgrim's story feels, while reading, like it is the most important one (which of course it is, from the point of view of the character telling it). This a real credit to the author's storytelling skill.
Sequel recommendation:
Hyperion has an open ending, and I think it's possible to stop there. However, I'd highly recommend reading at least The Fall of Hyperion for a clear, satisfying conclusion to this story. It has a more traditional structure, but is an excellent sci-fi novel.The later novels (Endymion and The Fall of Endymion) are not essential, I feel, but I'm glad I read them. While I found their main characters not as compelling as Hyperion's, they do explore some very interesting sci-fi concepts.
I really appreciate the insight on the sequels. I was a bit disappointed that Hyperion ended on such an open note. I would have liked closure but I also understand that it was already a long and complex enough book. I'll be interested to see how the storytelling changes with the narrative style change.
I, too, was impressed at how complex the story could be while not being confusing. The vignette-styling really helped compartmentalize the individual stories while giving the reader little moments of "Oh wait, I know that character already!" A very satisfying read overall.
What did you find noteworthy or surprising about the book? What was different from what you had expected?
So much poetry! I found myself very engaged with this book, and surprised myself with how much I enjoyed the poetry itself and the discussions of poetry.
The ending was also a bold choice! I read and thoroughly enjoyed the sequel — I couldn’t stop myself! But part of me almost wishes there hadn’t been a sequel, just to really put some force behind that ending.
In my mind, the second book almost reads like poetry fanfiction. It feels like such a dumb phrase to use to describe it, but it also feels right?
Ha! Yes, that is even more true in the sequel, I would say
We're off to see the wizard, indeed.
I’m really debating if I should find and read some of Keats’ works now.
Keats poems are easily available online. He wrote before poets really let go of narrative structure in the English speaking world. I would say go for it!
The underlying theme of redemption through suffering/self-flagellation. It's distinctly Christian. I found it off-putting. It caused me to stop my reread about halfway through.
On the other hand, I really enjoyed reading Sol’s philosophical arguments about sacrifice. The whole thing felt very Jewish (which I was pleasantly surprised by), and the conclusion was interesting and made sense to me. I’m not at all a religious Jew, but I appreciated the moral quandary posed and how Sol thought about it.
I may have to read more then.
I can’t say you’ll definitely enjoy it, but I felt like the Christian ethics were relatively confined to the Christian characters — and that the mosaic of ethical perspectives showcased by the different characters felt pretty impressive to me
I would echo this comment. I was very impressed by Simmons' ability to bring different and consistent ethical and philosophical structures to the individual characters. You can tell that Simmons did a good amount of research and genuine understanding and comprehension to be able to write not just Christian concepts but Jesuit Christian concepts and follow it up later with a range of Jewish arguments on suffering and sacrifice. I am not as well versed in Islamic philosophy so I couldn't speak remotely knowledgeably on how well represented any philosophic school was presented in the book, but I did recognize some Islamic influence in there as well.
At one point a character uses the word hermeneutics correctly in a paragraph that contains other technical terms from the study of religion.
This author put in the work for this book.
Mosaic of ethical perspectives is a very precise description that fits the book. I've just now finished. It was fascinating.
I loved it!!! I was a bit nervous because I've had mixed experiences with Simmons before (with Ilium/Olympos). But this was great! It takes until book 4 until I'm ever super frustrated with his writing which is impressive given how Simmons-y Simmons can be at times. Currently I'm at about 45% into Rise of Endymion and I'll finish it in April (after next season of /r/fantasy bingo starts).
I thought it was going to be ENTIRELY the 7 separate stories so I was a bit surprised there was an overarching narrative, and I didn't really care that much about the present day, the past was much more interesting.
Was there anything you thought was especially well done by the author?
Poorly done?
Simmons kept me incredibly engaged in the actual plot of the book despite it only taking up <5% of the actual novel. The way the pilgrims tell their own stories while traveling to meet the Shrike makes for a great literary decision.
I'd say the weakest story for me was the Consul's story, but I think it just didn't hit me right. It objectively tied a lot of stuff together.
I felt the Consul's story was... decent. It felt like there was a lack of actual draw to Hyperion though. The other pilgrims all had direct, usually Shrike-related, reasons to go to or return to Hyperion. The Consul was less direct. The other weakness of his story is that his story gets you emotionally invested in his grandfather, not him. I personally felt a bit let down with the "reveal" after the first 3/4 of his story. However, I liked it more than M. Lamia's story, and it felt like a breath of fresh air after that one. I really couldn't jive with the detective-noir vibe that petered out a third of the way into the story. I liked the last third of her story enough and found the AI concepts compelling enough but I just really didn't like the storytelling style (or the voice acting as much in that part of the audiobook, not that the audiobook would be winning any awards from me to begin with.)
Agreed. I really liked the AI parts of her story (particularly because I myself am a computer programmer). I also enjoyed the net addicts it portrayed. But the actual noir and detective elements got lost on me.
Off topic, but would you like to be added to the ping list for book club posts, or are you just here for this one? Or something else?
Frequency of pings is usually twice per month.
No thank you, I'm just passing by :) you just happened to pick one of my favorite books for this month!
I've read the first two "Tales" so far. I think the portrayal of space Jesuits was very realistic. It's a very niche sub-genre of story, possibly consisting just of Hyperion and The Sparrow (and sequels) but it felt correct to me.
Dune touches on Space Jews in 5 and 6, which is an adjacent category I suppose.
It's funny that you mention The Sparrow because I'm reading it now, actually!
Space Judaism is definitely an adjacent subgenre, not sure how many entries it has though.
Buckle up, the Sparrow was a rough one.
I just finished the first chapter, and I’m very intrigued.
The book format (assuming it follows with each chapter being mostly the story from each pilgrim) seems to be pretty interesting and should keep me hooked.
I’m finding the worldbuilding to be pretty intriguing, so hoping we find out more as the story goes on (and that each’s story keeps being interesting - though I’m sure they’ll be different enough).