Tildes Book Club - Reminder - A House With Good Bones at the end of June
Hi Everyone, This is just a reminder that A House With Good Bones is scheduled for the end of June. I'm looking forward to discussing it with you.
Hi Everyone, This is just a reminder that A House With Good Bones is scheduled for the end of June. I'm looking forward to discussing it with you.
Tildes is a very serious site, where we discuss very serious matters like dsa, marine corps and chainmail. Tags culled from the highest voted topics from the last seven days, if anyone gave two hoots.
But one of my favourite tags happens to be offbeat! Taking its original inspiration from Sir Nils Olav III, this thread is looking for any far-fetched offbeat stories lurking in the newspapers. It may not deserve its own post, but it deserves a wider audience!
A while ago some of the keys on my Dell XPS laptop started working poorly, they were only registering the presses half of the time or if I pushed them really hard. I tried removing the keycaps and cleaning the keys on the inside, but to no avail. Well, I thought, that means it's time to get a new laptop. So I was choosing the next laptop to get. One of the options I considered was the Framework laptop, which is supposed to be super repairable - I mean, if only I could just replace my laptop keyboard, I wouldn't have to buy a whole new laptop just because of a few broken keys!
Then I thought about it again. I realized that a repairable laptop is only useful if you actually try to repair your laptop, which I've never done. So, I looked it up, and turns out Dell, while obviously not as easily repairable as Framework, has very well-detailed official service manuals as well!
Two weeks of waiting for a Chinese copycat keyboard from AliExpress and three hours of work later, I finally have a fully working laptop! Turns out it isn't hard at all to replace a broken keyboard - but I'm still very proud of myself for doing it, mostly for even deciding to do it instead of just turning a fully functional laptop into e-waste as I would've done otherwise. I was also really surprised that Dell laptops are that easy to fix (though they don't officially sell replacement parts to consumers), since it's known to be a company that makes a ton of money on expensive support offerings.
I don't really know what the lesson of this post is, I just wanted to share this small achievement with y'all.
MLMs = "multi-level marketing" companies, which is essentially a euphemism for "pyramid scheme." These are flat out illegal in many countries, but are, notably, quite legal in the US.
They used to be huge in the 2010s, but I don't hear much about them anymore (granted, I haven't been on social media since 2016). I know several IRL people who got into them, and I even regrettably bought products from some of them before I really understood what they were or how they worked.
I recently read Hey, Hun by Emily Lynn Paulson who was toward the top of the pyramid at Rodan + Fields.
In the book she mentions that algorithmic changes from social media companies ended up downgrading a lot of MLM postings, which cut off oxygen to the cycles of recruitment that these companies rely on. For example, Rodan + Fields moved to an affiliate model in 2024.
I'm curious about what the MLM landscape looks like right now.
People don't have to limit responses to just those questions -- consider this a general MLM discussion topic where anything related to them is fair game.
Canadian Grand Prix
Circuit Gilles-Villeneuve
June 13-15, 2025
Grand Prix Qualifying:
Saturday, June 14, 2025 - 20:00 UTC / 4:00p US EDT
Grand Prix:
Sunday, June 15, 2025 - 18:00 UTC / 2:00p US EDT
| Pos | No | Driver | Car | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Laps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63 | George Russell | Mercedes | 1:12.075 | 1:11.570 | 1:10.899 | 21 |
| 2 | 1 | Max Verstappen | Red Bull Racing Honda RBPT | 1:12.054 | 1:11.638 | 1:11.059 | 20 |
| 3 | 81 | Oscar Piastri | McLaren Mercedes | 1:11.939 | 1:11.715 | 1:11.120 | 23 |
| 4 | 12 | Kimi Antonelli | Mercedes | 1:12.279 | 1:11.974 | 1:11.391 | 21 |
| 5 | 44 | Lewis Hamilton | Ferrari | 1:11.952 | 1:11.885 | 1:11.526 | 27 |
| 6 | 14 | Fernando Alonso | Aston Martin Aramco Mercedes | 1:12.073 | 1:11.805 | 1:11.586 | 27 |
| 7 | 4 | Lando Norris | McLaren Mercedes | 1:11.826 | 1:11.599 | 1:11.625 | 22 |
| 8 | 16 | Charles Leclerc | Ferrari | 1:12.038 | 1:11.626 | 1:11.682 | 27 |
| 9 | 6 | Isack Hadjar | Racing Bulls Honda RBPT | 1:12.211 | 1:12.003 | 1:11.867 | 21 |
| 10 | 23 | Alexander Albon | Williams Mercedes | 1:12.090 | 1:11.892 | 1:11.907 | 30 |
| 11 | 22 | Yuki Tsunoda | Red Bull Racing Honda RBPT | 1:12.334 | 1:12.102 | 15 | |
| 12 | 43 | Franco Colapinto | Alpine Renault | 1:12.234 | 1:12.142 | 20 | |
| 13 | 27 | Nico Hulkenberg | Kick Sauber Ferrari | 1:12.323 | 1:12.183 | 18 | |
| 14 | 87 | Oliver Bearman | Haas Ferrari | 1:12.306 | 1:12.340 | 19 | |
| 15 | 31 | Esteban Ocon | Haas Ferrari | 1:12.378 | 1:12.634 | 21 | |
| 16 | 5 | Gabriel Bortoleto | Kick Sauber Ferrari | 1:12.385 | 11 | ||
| 17 | 55 | Carlos Sainz | Williams Mercedes | 1:12.398 | 13 | ||
| 18 | 18 | Lance Stroll | Aston Martin Aramco Mercedes | 1:12.517 | 12 | ||
| 19 | 30 | Liam Lawson | Racing Bulls Honda RBPT | 1:12.525 | 10 | ||
| 20 | 10 | Pierre Gasly | Alpine Renault | 1:12.667 | 12 |
Source: F1.com
| Pos | No | Driver | Car | Laps | Time/retired | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63 | George Russell | Mercedes | 70 | 1:31:52.688 | 25 |
| 2 | 1 | Max Verstappen | Red Bull Racing Honda RBPT | 70 | +0.228s | 18 |
| 3 | 12 | Kimi Antonelli | Mercedes | 70 | +1.014s | 15 |
| 4 | 81 | Oscar Piastri | McLaren Mercedes | 70 | +2.109s | 12 |
| 5 | 16 | Charles Leclerc | Ferrari | 70 | +3.442s | 10 |
| 6 | 44 | Lewis Hamilton | Ferrari | 70 | +10.713s | 8 |
| 7 | 14 | Fernando Alonso | Aston Martin Aramco Mercedes | 70 | +10.972s | 6 |
| 8 | 27 | Nico Hulkenberg | Kick Sauber Ferrari | 70 | +15.364s | 4 |
| 9 | 31 | Esteban Ocon | Haas Ferrari | 69 | +1 lap | 2 |
| 10 | 55 | Carlos Sainz | Williams Mercedes | 69 | +1 lap | 1 |
| 11 | 87 | Oliver Bearman | Haas Ferrari | 69 | +1 lap | 0 |
| 12 | 22 | Yuki Tsunoda | Red Bull Racing Honda RBPT | 69 | +1 lap | 0 |
| 13 | 43 | Franco Colapinto | Alpine Renault | 69 | +1 lap | 0 |
| 14 | 5 | Gabriel Bortoleto | Kick Sauber Ferrari | 69 | +1 lap | 0 |
| 15 | 10 | Pierre Gasly | Alpine Renault | 69 | +1 lap | 0 |
| 16 | 6 | Isack Hadjar | Racing Bulls Honda RBPT | 69 | +1 lap | 0 |
| 17 | 18 | Lance Stroll | Aston Martin Aramco Mercedes | 69 | +1 lap | 0 |
| 18 | 4 | Lando Norris | McLaren Mercedes | 66 | DNF | 0 |
| NC | 30 | Liam Lawson | Racing Bulls Honda RBPT | 53 | DNF | 0 |
| NC | 23 | Alexander Albon | Williams Mercedes | 46 | DNF | 0 |
Fastest Lap: George Russell (1:14:119, Lap 63)
DOTD: Kimi Antonelli
Source: F1.com
Next race:
Austrian Grand Prix
Red Bull Ring
Sunday, June 29, 2025
Listened to Craig Ferguson on his podcast "Joy" talking with Diedrich Bader, last known for playing Jethro in the Beverly Hillbillies movie (which flopped).
The most interesting part was their discussion about gaining and losing that "Hollywood aura" - they agreed it was like someone handing you a magic hat, and while you're wearing it, you're the most special person in the room and everyone wants your attention. And then the hat goes away and you're back to being very ordinary and in at lot of cases, become an actor somewhat desperately looking for more work. Which is why they attend so many parties and awards. It's not so much about the glamor, its about getting a chance to network and try to find a new gig with the producers and directors and financiers in attendance.
Bader asked Ferguson if there was anyone he interviewed that gave him that sense of awe, someone who still wore that magic hat? Nope. Ferguson said after years of doing his Late Night show they were all just people. New "star", old "star", none of them really made a big impression.
Although he DID say when Sean Connery shook his wife's hand her chest visibly blushed and Craig asked her later what that was all about. She said, "Well it doesnt do it for YOU but THAT was Sean Connery!" Pretty funny.
But it was interesting to hear some insiders talking about other insiders the way they did. They're all just actors looking to stay employed. Which makes sense when you see an A list actor in a B movie and wonder why they took that role. Probably had bills to pay, that's why.
Post news and reviews Talk about your own experiences with the new system and games Add some Tildes friends on your Nintendo account Fawn over Cow
It's that time again for the greatest race of the year.
Race Start:
Saturday, 14 June 2025 - 16:00 CET (14:00 UTC)
| Position | Class | Number | Driver | Team | Qualifying | Hyperpole 1 | Hyperpole 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hypercar | 12 | Alex Lynn | Cadillac Hertz Team Jota | 03:22.8 | 03:23.6 | 03:23.2 |
| 2 | Hypercar | 38 | Earl Bamber | Cadillac Hertz Team Jota | 03:23.5 | 03:23.1 | 03:23.3 |
| 3 | Hypercar | 5 | Mathieu Jaminet | Porsche Penske Motorsport | 03:23.5 | 03:24.0 | 03:23.5 |
| 4 | Hypercar | 15 | Dries Vanthoor | BMW M Team WRT | 03:22.9 | 03:24.1 | 03:23.7 |
| 5 | Hypercar | 4 | Nick Tandy | Porsche Penske Motorsport | 03:24.6 | 03:23.5 | 03:24.0 |
| 6 | Hypercar | 20 | Sheldon van der Linde | BMW M Team WRT | 03:23.8 | 03:23.2 | 03:24.0 |
| 7 | Hypercar | 30 | Antonio Fuoco | Ferrari AF Corse | 03:23.5 | 03:23.3 | 03:24.2 |
| 8 | Hypercar | 311 | Felipe Drugovich | Cadillac Whelen | 03:23.9 | 03:22.7 | 03:24.4 |
| 9 | Hypercar | 36 | Frédéric Makowiecki | Alpine Endurance Team | 03:23.9 | 03:23.5 | 03:24.4 |
| 10 | Hypercar | 8 | Sébastien Buemi | Toyota Gazoo Racing | 03:24.0 | 03:23.5 | No time |
| 11 | Hypercar | 51 | Alessandro Pier Guidi | Ferrari AF Corse | 03:23.2 | 03:24.1 | |
| 12 | Hypercar | 35 | Paul-Loup Chatin | Alpine Endurance Team | 03:24.7 | 03:24.2 | |
| 13 | Hypercar | 83 | Yifei Ye | AF Corse | 03:24.0 | 03:24.3 | |
| 14 | Hypercar | 101 | Ricky Taylor | Cadillac WTR | 03:24.0 | 03:24.8 | |
| 15 | Hypercar | 9 | Marco Sørensen | Aston Martin THOR Team | 03:24.9 | 03:25.3 | |
| 16 | Hypercar | 7 | Nyck de Vries | Toyota Gazoo Racing | 03:25.1 | ||
| 17 | Hypercar | 94 | Stoffel Vandoorne | Peugeot TotalEnergies | 03:25.2 | ||
| 18 | Hypercar | 93 | Jean-Éric Vergne | Peugeot TotalEnergies | 03:25.5 | ||
| 19 | Hypercar | 99 | Neel Jani | Proton Competition | 03:25.5 | ||
| 20 | Hypercar | 7 | Harry Tincknell | Aston Martin THOR Team | 03:26.3 | ||
| DSQ | Hypercar | 6 | Kévin Estre | Porsche Penske Motorsport | 03:23.4 | ||
| 22 | LMP2 Pro-Am | 29 | Mathias Beche | TDS Racing | 03:36.2 | 03:35.9 | 03:35.1 |
| 23 | LMP2 | 43 | Tom Dillmann | Inter Europol Competition | 03:37.0 | 03:34.7 | 03:35.3 |
| 24 | LMP2 Pro-Am | 199 | Louis Delétraz | AO by TF | 03:35.5 | 03:35.3 | 03:35.4 |
| 25 | LMP2 Pro-Am | 23 | Ben Hanley | United Autosports | 03:35.7 | 03:36.5 | 03:35.5 |
| 26 | LMP2 | 22 | Pietro Fittipaldi | United Autosports | 03:36.5 | 03:35.5 | 03:35.6 |
| 27 | LMP2 | 37 | Tom Blomqvist | CLX – Pure Rxcing | 03:37.7 | 03:36.4 | 03:36.2 |
| 28 | LMP2 Pro-Am | 183 | Matthieu Vaxivière | AF Corse | 03:37.4 | 03:36.3 | 03:37.0 |
| 29 | LMP2 Pro-Am | 16 | Ryan Cullen | RLR MSport | 03:37.1 | 03:36.5 | 03:38.9 |
| 30 | LMP2 | 28 | Sebastián Álvarez | IDEC Sport | 03:37.0 | 03:36.7 | |
| 31 | LMP2 Pro-Am | 45 | Nicky Catsburg | Algarve Pro Racing | 03:36.0 | 03:36.8 | |
| 32 | LMP2 | 48 | Franck Perera | VDS Panis Racing | 03:36.6 | 03:36.8 | |
| 33 | LMP2 | 25 | Lorenzo Fluxá | Algarve Pro Racing | 03:36.6 | 03:37.1 | |
| 34 | LMP2 Pro-Am | 11 | Bent Viscaal | Proton Competition | 03:37.8 | ||
| 35 | LMP2 | 18 | André Lotterer | IDEC Sport | 03:37.9 | ||
| 36 | LMP2 | 9 | Reshad de Gerus | Iron Lynx – Proton | 03:38.5 | ||
| 37 | LMP2 Pro-Am | 34 | Luca Ghiotto | Inter Europol Competition | 03:39.3 | ||
| 38 | LMP2 Pro-Am | 24 | Colin Braun | Nielsen Racing | 03:40.3 | ||
| 39 | LMGT3 | 27 | Mattia Drudi | Heart of Racing Team | 03:57.1 | 03:54.7 | 03:52.8 |
| 40 | LMGT3 | 21 | Alessio Rovera | Vista AF Corse | 03:58.1 | 03:54.7 | 03:53.1 |
| 41 | LMGT3 | 46 | Valentino Rossi | Team WRT | 03:56.9 | 03:54.3 | 03:55.0 |
| 42 | LMGT3 | 61 | Maxime Martin | Iron Lynx | 03:58.7 | 03:54.7 | 03:55.0 |
| 43 | LMGT3 | 92 | Richard Lietz | Manthey 1st Phorm | 03:57.3 | 03:54.7 | 03:55.1 |
| 44 | LMGT3 | 81 | Rui Andrade | TF Sport | 03:57.7 | 03:54.6 | 03:55.7 |
| 45 | LMGT3 | 95 | Marino Sato | United Autosports | 03:59.0 | 03:55.2 | 03:56.0 |
| 46 | LMGT3 | 78 | Jack Hawksworth | Akkodis ASP Team | 03:57.3 | 03:54.9 | 04:03.7 |
| 47 | LMGT3 | 193 | Chris Froggatt | Ziggo Sport – Tempesta | 03:58.0 | 03:55.9 | |
| 48 | LMGT3 | 88 | Giammarco Levorato | Proton Competition | 03:57.8 | 03:56.2 | |
| 49 | LMGT3 | 59 | Sébastien Baud | United Autosports | 03:58.1 | 03:56.2 | |
| 50 | LMGT3 | 54 | Francesco Castellacci | Vista AF Corse | 03:58.6 | ||
| 51 | LMGT3 | 77 | Bernardo Sousa | Proton Competition | 03:59.0 | ||
| 52 | LMGT3 | 87 | Răzvan Umbrărescu | Akkodis ASP Team | 03:59.0 | ||
| 53 | LMGT3 | 57 | Takeshi Kimura | Kessel Racing | 03:59.1 | ||
| 54 | LMGT3 | 31 | Yasser Shahin | The Bend Team WRT | 03:59.3 | ||
| 55 | LMGT3 | 10 | Derek DeBoer | Racing Spirit of Léman | 03:59.5 | ||
| 56 | LMGT3 | 85 | Célia Martin | Iron Dames | 04:00.0 | ||
| 57 | LMGT3 | 90 | Andrew Gilbert | Manthey | 04:00.4 | ||
| 58 | LMGT3 | 13 | Antares Au | AWA Racing | 04:01.1 | ||
| 59 | LMGT3 | 150 | Custodio Toledo | Richard Mille AF Corse | No time | ||
| 60 | LMGT3 | 33 | Orey Fidani | TF Sport | No time | ||
| 61 | LMGT3 | 60 | Stephen Grove | Iron Lynx | No time | ||
| 62 | LMGT3 | 63 | Ben Keating | Iron Lynx | No time |
| Finishing Positon | Number | Team | Driver 1 | Driver 2 | Driver 3 | Class | STATUS | LAPS | Total Time Raced | Gap To Previous Car |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 83 | AF Corse | Robert KUBICA | Yifei YE | Philip HANSON | HYPERCAR | Classified | 387 | 24:02:53.332 | |
| 2 | 6 | Porsche Penske Motorsport | Kévin ESTRE | Laurens VANTHOOR | Matt CAMPBELL | HYPERCAR | Classified | 387 | 24:03:07.416 | 14.084 |
| 3 | 51 | Ferrari AF Corse | Alessandro PIER GUIDI | James CALADO | Antonio GIOVINAZZI | HYPERCAR | Classified | 387 | 24:03:21.819 | 14.403 |
| 4 | 50 | Ferrari AF Corse | Antonio FUOCO | Nicklas NIELSEN | Miguel MOLINA | HYPERCAR | Classified | 387 | 24:03:22.998 | 1.179 |
| 5 | 12 | Cadillac Hertz Team JOTA | Will STEVENS | Norman NATO | Alex LYNN | HYPERCAR | Classified | 387 | 24:05:11.971 | 1:48.973 |
| 6 | 7 | Toyota Gazoo Racing | Mike CONWAY | Kamui KOBAYASHI | Nyck DE VRIES | HYPERCAR | Classified | 386 | 24:03:08.984 | 1 Laps |
| 7 | 5 | Porsche Penske Motorsport | Julien ANDLAUER | Michael CHRISTENSEN | Mathieu JAMINET | HYPERCAR | Classified | 386 | 24:03:45.861 | 36.877 |
| 8 | 38 | Cadillac Hertz Team JOTA | Earl BAMBER | Sébastien BOURDAIS | Jenson BUTTON | HYPERCAR | Classified | 386 | 24:04:30.532 | 44.671 |
| 9 | 4 | Porsche Penske Motorsport | Felipe NASR | Nick TANDY | Pascal WEHRLEIN | HYPERCAR | Classified | 386 | 24:05:28.957 | 58.425 |
| 10 | 35 | Alpine Endurance Team | Paul-Loup CHATIN | Ferdinand HABSBURG | Charles MILESI | HYPERCAR | Classified | 385 | 24:06:16.781 | 1 Laps |
| 11 | 36 | Alpine Endurance Team | Mick SCHUMACHER | Frédéric MAKOWIECKI | Jules GOUNON | HYPERCAR | Classified | 384 | 24:03:37.826 | 1 Laps |
| 12 | 94 | Peugeot TotalEnergies | Loïc DUVAL | Malthe JAKOBSEN | Stoffel VANDOORNE | HYPERCAR | Classified | 384 | 24:04:18.871 | 41.045 |
| 13 | 009 | Aston Martin Thor Team | Alex RIBERAS | Marco SORENSEN | Roman DE ANGELIS | HYPERCAR | Classified | 383 | 24:03:51.079 | 1 Laps |
| 14 | 99 | Proton Competition | Neel JANI | Nicolas PINO | Nicolas VARRONE | HYPERCAR | Classified | 383 | 24:05:04.367 | 1:13.288 |
| 15 | 007 | Aston Martin Thor Team | Harry TINCKNELL | Tom GAMBLE | Ross GUNN | HYPERCAR | Classified | 381 | 24:02:56.333 | 2 Laps |
| 16 | 8 | Toyota Gazoo Racing | Sébastien BUEMI | Brendon HARTLEY | Ryo HIRAKAWA | HYPERCAR | Classified | 380 | 24:05:28.156 | 1 Laps |
| 17 | 93 | Peugeot TotalEnergies | Paul DI RESTA | Mikkel JENSEN | Jean-Eric VERGNE | HYPERCAR | Classified | 379 | 24:03:16.528 | 1 Laps |
| 18 | 20 | BMW M Team WRT | René RAST | Robin FRIJNS | Sheldon VAN DER LINDE | HYPERCAR | Classified | 375 | 24:02:56.020 | 4 Laps |
| 19 | 43 | Inter Europol Competition | Jakub SMIECHOWSKI | Tom DILLMANN | Nick YELLOLY | LMP2 | Classified | 367 | 24:04:09.023 | 8 Laps |
| 20 | 48 | VDS Panis Racing | Oliver GRAY | Esteban MASSON | Franck PERERA | LMP2 | Classified | 367 | 24:06:04.776 | 1:55.753 |
| 21 | 199 | AO by TF | PJ HYETT | Dane CAMERON | Louis DELETRAZ | LMP2 | Classified | 366 | 24:05:56.819 | 1 Laps |
| 22 | 9 | Iron Lynx - Proton | Jonas RIED | Maceo CAPIETTO | Reshad DE GÉRUS | LMP2 | Classified | 365 | 24:03:03.559 | 1 Laps |
| 23 | 29 | TDS Racing | Rodrigo SALES | Mathias BECHE | Clément NOVALAK | LMP2 | Classified | 365 | 24:05:44.469 | 2:40.910 |
| 24 | 11 | Proton Competition | Giorgio RODA | Rene BINDER | Bent VISCAAL | LMP2 | Classified | 365 | 24:06:09.797 | 25.328 |
| 25 | 22 | United Autosports | Renger VAN DER ZANDE | Pietro FITTIPALDI | David HEINEMEIER HANSSON | LMP2 | Classified | 364 | 24:03:43.736 | 1 Laps |
| 26 | 25 | Algarve Pro Racing | Matthias KAISER | Lorenzo FLUXA | Théo POURCHAIRE | LMP2 | Classified | 364 | 24:04:06.445 | 22.709 |
| 27 | 183 | AF Corse | François PERRODO | Matthieu VAXIVIERE | Antonio FELIX DA COSTA | LMP2 | Classified | 364 | 24:04:41.940 | 35.495 |
| 28 | 34 | Inter Europol Competition | Nicholas BOULLE | Jean-Baptiste SIMMENAUER | Luca GHIOTTO | LMP2 | Classified | 363 | 24:03:03.480 | 1 Laps |
| 29 | 23 | United Autosports | Daniel SCHNEIDER | Oliver JARVIS | Benjamin HANLEY | LMP2 | Classified | 363 | 24:06:04.223 | 3:00.743 |
| 30 | 16 | RLR M Sport | Michael JENSEN | Ryan CULLEN | Patrick PILET | LMP2 | Classified | 362 | 24:02:54.768 | 1 Laps |
| 31 | 45 | Algarve Pro Racing | George KURTZ | Nicky CATSBURG | Alexander QUINN | LMP2 | Classified | 362 | 24:04:06.381 | 1:11.613 |
| 32 | 15 | BMW M Team WRT | Dries VANTHOOR | Raffaele MARCIELLO | Kevin MAGNUSSEN | HYPERCAR | Classified | 361 | 24:04:22.255 | 1 Laps |
| 33 | 37 | CLX - Pure Rxcing | Aliaksandr MALYKHIN | Tom BLOMQVIST | Tristan VAUTIER | LMP2 | Classified | 358 | 24:06:11.786 | 3 Laps |
| 34 | 92 | Manthey 1ST Phorm | Ryan HARDWICK | Riccardo PERA | Richard LIETZ | LMGT3 | Classified | 341 | 24:03:22.925 | 17 Laps |
| 35 | 21 | Vista AF Corse | François HERIAU | Simon MANN | Alessio ROVERA | LMGT3 | Classified | 341 | 24:03:56.184 | 33.259 |
| 36 | 81 | TF Sport | Tom VAN ROMPUY | Rui ANDRADE | Charlie EASTWOOD | LMGT3 | Classified | 341 | 24:04:34.635 | 38.451 |
| 37 | 27 | Heart of Racing Team | Ian JAMES | Mattia DRUDI | Zacharie ROBICHON | LMGT3 | Classified | 341 | 24:05:38.047 | 1:03.412 |
| 38 | 87 | Akkodis ASP Team | Petru UMBRARESCU | Jose Maria LOPEZ | Clemens SCHMID | LMGT3 | Classified | 340 | 24:02:57.829 | 1 Laps |
| 39 | 90 | Manthey | Antares AU | Loek HARTOG | Klaus BACHLER | LMGT3 | Classified | 340 | 24:05:17.091 | 2:19.262 |
| 40 | 33 | TF Sport | Ben KEATING | Jonny EDGAR | Daniel JUNCADELLA | LMGT3 | Classified | 339 | 24:04:43.509 | 1 Laps |
| 41 | 57 | Kessel Racing | Takeshi KIMURA | Daniel SERRA | Casper STEVENSON | LMGT3 | Classified | 339 | 24:05:03.870 | 20.361 |
| 42 | 77 | Proton Competition | Bernardo SOUSA | Ben TUCK | Benjamin BARKER | LMGT3 | Classified | 338 | 24:03:30.810 | 1 Laps |
| 43 | 13 | AWA Racing | Orey FIDANI | Lars KERN | Matthew BELL | LMGT3 | Classified | 338 | 24:03:33.531 | 2.721 |
| 44 | 150 | Richard Mille AF Corse | Custodio TOLEDO | Lilou WADOUX | Riccardo AGOSTINI | LMGT3 | Classified | 338 | 24:05:03.140 | 1:29.609 |
| 45 | 61 | Iron Lynx | Martin BERRY | Lin HODENIUS | Maxime MARTIN | LMGT3 | Classified | 337 | 24:06:46.484 | 1 Laps |
| 46 | 10 | Racing Spirit of Leman | Derek DEBOER | Valentin HASSE CLOT | Eduardo BARRICHELLO | LMGT3 | Classified | 336 | 24:03:05.865 | 1 Laps |
| 47 | 193 | Ziggo Sport Tempesta | Jonathan HUI | Christopher FROGGATT | Edward CHEEVER | LMGT3 | Classified | 335 | 24:04:20.784 | 1 Laps |
| 48 | 63 | Iron Lynx | Stephen GROVE | Brenton GROVE | Luca STOLZ | LMGT3 | Classified | 334 | 24:03:12.269 | 1 Laps |
| 49 | 85 | Iron Dames | Celia MARTIN | Rahel FREY | Sarah BOVY | LMGT3 | Classified | 334 | 24:03:57.025 | 44.756 |
| 50 | 59 | United Autosports | James COTTINGHAM | Grégoire SAUCY | Sébastien BAUD | LMGT3 | Not classified | 314 | 22:52:42.255 | 20 Laps |
| 51 | 28 | IDEC Sport | Paul LAFARGUE | Job VAN UITERT | Sebastian ALVAREZ | LMP2 | Retired | 308 | 20:18:29.995 | 6 Laps |
| 52 | 78 | Akkodis ASP Team | Arnold ROBIN | Jack HAWKSWORTH | Finn GEHRSITZ | LMGT3 | Retired | 268 | 19:02:41.151 | 40 Laps |
| 53 | 311 | Cadillac Whelen | Jack AITKEN | Felipe DRUGOVICH | Frederik VESTI | HYPERCAR | Retired | 247 | 16:00:31.169 | 21 Laps |
| 54 | 18 | IDEC Sport | Jamie CHADWICK | Mathys JAUBERT | André LOTTERER | LMP2 | Retired | 206 | 13:34:12.511 | 41 Laps |
| 55 | 54 | Vista AF Corse | Thomas FLOHR | Francesco CASTELLACCI | Davide RIGON | LMGT3 | Retired | 192 | 14:04:56.647 | 14 Laps |
| 56 | 101 | Cadillac WTR | Ricky TAYLOR | Jordan TAYLOR | Filipe ALBUQUERQUE | HYPERCAR | Retired | 189 | 11:55:38.240 | 3 Laps |
| 57 | 24 | Nielsen Racing | Naveen RAO | Cem BÖLÜKBASI | Colin BRAUN | LMP2 | Retired | 170 | 11:10:29.565 | 19 Laps |
| 58 | 31 | The Bend Team WRT | Yasser SHAHIN | Timur BOGUSLAVSKIY | Augusto FARFUS | LMGT3 | Retired | 168 | 13:17:27.884 | 2 Laps |
| 59 | 46 | Team WRT | Ahmad AL HARTHY | Valentino ROSSI | Kelvin VAN DER LINDE | LMGT3 | Retired | 156 | 11:02:28.095 | 12 Laps |
| 60 | 95 | United Autosports | Darren LEUNG | Sean GELAEL | Marino SATO | LMGT3 | Retired | 80 | 5:35:58.499 | 76 Laps |
| 61 | 60 | Iron Lynx | Andrew GILBERT | Lorcan HANAFIN | Fran RUEDA | LMGT3 | Retired | 57 | 6:05:02.685 | 23 Laps |
| 62 | 88 | Proton Competition | Stefano GATTUSO | Giammarco LEVORATO | Dennis OLSEN | LMGT3 | Retired | 46 | 3:11:36.304 | 11 Laps |
Have you watched any movies recently you want to discuss? Any films you want to recommend or are hyped about? Feel free to discuss anything here.
Please just try to provide fair warning of spoilers if you can.
Hi, so I've been thinking about this for several days now, and thought it might be an interesting topic for Tildes.
Earlier this week, YouTube suggested this AI Sitcom video to me. Some of the jokes are actually very cohesive "Dad jokes", and it got me wondering how much of the video was AI generated. Are the one-liners themselves AI generated? Was this script generated with AI, and then edited before passing it on to something else to generate the video and voice? Or are we at the phase where AI could generate the whole thing with a single prompt? If it's the latter I find this sort of terrifying, because the finished product is very cohesive for something with almost no editing.
I'd also be interested in discussing where this video might have come from. The channel and descriptions have almost no information, so it seems like this may be a channel that finds these elsewhere and reposts? Or maybe the channel is the original and just trying to be vague about technology used?
Also side note, I have no idea if this belongs in ~Tech, so feel free to move it around as needed.
Welcome to the inaugural thread! It is important to me that this is an inclusive space; and it should evolve to serve the needs of the community.
What is this space?
It is intended as a community space, primarily for those of us with ADHD and/or autism; but it should be open to evolution on what is explicitely encouraged (because all are welcome). It intended as a space to vent about your struggles and challenges in a space where there is implicit understanding of the issues we face with these diagnoses. It is intended as a space to celebrate your achievements and victories with those who understand why those are as meaningful as they are, even the little ones. It is intended as a space to seek support with related issues — like requesting accountability partnering, chunking, rubber-ducking, et cetera. It is a place to post news and articles about ADHD and autism that are of interest to the community. A place for discussion. And a place to be serious and silly together with folks who understand.
All are welcome to participate here. While generally on Tildes I would expect most participants to accept that ADHD and autism and the like are real diagnoses, I would expect those participating here to either have those diagnoses, understand those diagnoses, or if someone wants to learn more, to ask questions here with an open mind — i.e. this is a positive and supportive space.
All are welcome to participate here. Not just those with these diagnoses. The self-diagnosed are welcome. Support is welcome to be sought by those with ADHD-adjacent issues: for example, depression can cause executive function issues such that accountability partnering could be helpful. Feel free to seek such help here.
Your feedback is requested and valued. This community will evolve to fit the needs of those who participate here. What works will be retained; what doesn't work will be dropped. I am your facilitator, not dictator; and while for this first thread I am speaking with my voice, as we evolve things and figure out what works, I will rephrase whatever text that gets posted each time into a passive voice. I just want to reassure you that while I'm taking a leadship position to get the ball rolling here, I will be removing myself from this so it truly is a community space for us all. But to start, you gotta have someone doing the thing. :)
For now, I'll create one top-level reply that requests for support should be posted under. The idea is that it makes it easier for those wishing to volunteer to help can find the requests more easily. We'll see if that works or not.
It is my humble opinion that one should be encourged to post as you wish. If you want to post multiple things in a top level reply that are going on, great. If you want to make two little top level replies about different topics, even on the same day? I think that's also fine. Don't be shy about posting.
I think a fortnightly thread feels about right to start. Too frequent and things can get lost. Too infrequent and the thread might die out before we get a new one. But as with everything else, feedback is desired. By coincidence of when the idea was had, I'm posting this one on a Friday. If you'd prefer a different day, that's feedback that is welcome.
Welcome to your space! Help make this space be what you want it to be. <3
edit: Forgot to post where this came from:
Most recently: https://tildes.net/~health.mental/1oac/proposal_adhd_support_thread_reoccurring
Less recently: https://tildes.net/~life/1o92/how_my_life_changed_with_adhd_medication#comments
That first thread had such a sense of community that I want that to keep going, basically. :)
Find yourself watching tons of great videos on [insert chosen video sharing platform], but also find yourself reluctant to flood the Tildes front page with them? Then this thread is for you.
It could be one quirky video that you feel deserves some eyeballs on it, or perhaps you've got a curated list of videos that you'd love to talk us through...
Share some of the best video content you've watched this past week/fortnight with us!
This is the thirteenth of an ongoing series of book discussions here on Tildes. We are discussing Elder Race by Adrian Tchaikovsky. Our next book will be A People's Future of the United States by Victor LaValle, at the end of May..
I don't have a particular format in mind for this discussion, but I will post some prompts and questions as comments to get things started. You're not obligated to respond to them or vote on them though. So feel free to make your own top-level comment for whatever you wish to discuss, questions you have of others, or even just to post a review of the book you have written yourself.
For latecomers, don't worry if you didn't read the book in time for this Discussion topic. You can always join in once you finish it. Tildes Activity sort, and "Collapse old comments" feature should keep the topic going for as long as people are still replying.
And for anyone uninterested in this topic please use the Ignore Topic feature on this so it doesn't keep popping up in your Activity sort, since it's likely to keep doing that while I set this discussion up, and once people start joining in.
Between Meta announcing that its AI, Meta AI, reached 1 billion users[1] and Google saying that AI Overviews are used by 1.5 billion[2], I’m curious to know how many of these people intentionally use the feature, or prefer it to what the AI replaces.
AI Overviews appear at the top of searches, with no option to turn them off. Meta AI, I suspect many people trigger accidentally by tapping that horrible button in WhatsApp, in search results across its three core apps, or when trying to tag someone in a group by typing an @ symbol.
It’s very easy to reach enormous numbers when you already have a giant platform. I don’t think that’s even part of the discussion. The issue is trumpeting these numbers as if they were earned, rather than imposed.
[1] https://www.cnbc.com/2025/05/28/zuckerberg-meta-ai-one-billion-monthly-users.html
[2] https://www.theverge.com/news/655930/google-q1-2025-earnings
Tildes is a very serious site, where we discuss very serious matters like right to repair, friendship and warfare.drone. Tags culled from the highest voted topics from the last seven days, if anyone was in doubt.
But one of my favourite tags happens to be offbeat! Taking its original inspiration from Sir Nils Olav III, this thread is looking for any far-fetched offbeat stories lurking in the newspapers. It may not deserve its own post, but it deserves a wider audience!
I’m starting a new 5e campaign with some friends, and I think I have some performance anxiety. I’m not the most creative person, and the last thing I want to do is kill the fun. The only other time I've played a ttrpg was years ago in high school.
I’m curious what you all have found detracts from a session as well as any advice that enhances the experience for everyone.
Have you watched any movies recently you want to discuss? Any films you want to recommend or are hyped about? Feel free to discuss anything here.
Please just try to provide fair warning of spoilers if you can.
Tildes is a very serious site, where we discuss very serious matters like psychology.social, adhd and words. Tags culled from the highest voted topics from the last seven days, if anyone was documenting these.
But one of my favourite tags happens to be offbeat! Taking its original inspiration from Sir Nils Olav III, this thread is looking for any far-fetched offbeat stories lurking in the newspapers. It may not deserve its own post, but it deserves a wider audience!
Hello to everyone who's reading this post :)
Now LLMs are increasingly so useful (of course after careful review of their generated answers), but I'm concerned about sharing my data, especially very personal questions and my thought process to these large tech giants who seem to be rather sketchy in terms of their privacy policy.
What are some ways I can keep my data private but still harness this amazing LLM technology? Also what are some legitimate and active forums for discussions on this topic? I have looked at reddit but haven't found it genuinely useful or trustworthy so far.
I am excited to hear your thoughts on this!
I am arguing here in regards to personally owned hw.
I personally think that the arguments in recent years were very heavily skewed in support of this and I would like to propose here counterarguments that I don't feel are considered enough are when I see this come up in various places. Or at least not said enough.
First and foremost what forcibly pushing updates actually means is the developer being given blank check to change the functionality of your device in any way they please. In case of various locked down hw such as smart things, game consoles, tvs, ereaders or others there is often not even a choice to use different sw because it is artificially blocked. Only real check against negative effects of this is legislation and potential of enough public outrage to impact future sales. From the state of various mainstream sw products it can be seen how well it works.
It creates a culture where pushing anti features is significantly easier and tech literacy is significantly harder to attain if only as a secondary effect of less transparent, more obtuse and more complicated systems, frequently with no actual need for more complexity which is not rooted in desire to increase monetization.
It also means it is harder as a user to guard against faulty updates.
Normalization of this behavior also means that any can do this with no pushback because it is the fabled default, the one where fundamental flaws are brushed aside while alternatives are rejected over cosmetic problems.
There could be argument meant for critical parts of critical sw such as os or browser, but if so it should be made individually and not be implicit. There is usually no meaningful individual control over feature updates, not just security ones. I also don't think forced updates for games on Steam for example can be argued to be something that benefits security.
One of the tags that I almost always remember to include in my posts here on Tildes is the author.authorname tags. I wonder which author is cited the most through the tagging system here on Tildes. I know that journalists in ~society show up a lot, but there are also quite a few repeat authors in ~games
Just a quick PSA, if anyone noticed massive amounts of shows disappeared from Netflix the past week or two. Apparently they're getting stricter with VPN detection, and blocking per region licensed shows if we're on VPN.
I sometimes feel like I am the only person who loses interest in a video game as soon as I have to spend any amount of time consulting an online guide or wiki to figure out how to progress.
Maybe it’s because I grew up playing games like Super Mario 64 and Ocarina of Time, along with their equivalents and sequels on the Gamecube, and later the Wii. I got either to 100% completion or close to on those, without getting any outside help.
The games themselves made it very clear what the objectives were and what collectibles and unlockables were available.
But at some point in recent years, it just became impossible to play a video game without having to consult a guide or a wiki to figure out not just how to progress in it, but sometimes even how to play it. 💀
And a good year ago or so, I began to subconsciously fight against this, because it annoyed me to no end. I began to just take breaks from a game if I couldn’t figure out how to progress, rather than go online and read some guide or wiki, because it was making me feel like I was wasting my time reading about the game, rather than just playing it, taking me out of the immersion in the process.
You know what? I’m making this a resolution. If I can’t figure out how to progress in a game on my own, then I just won’t. I’ll go play something else.
I have recently played some indie games where I needed zero assistance, and boy did it feel good to figure those games out on my own. Those are the best games (for me), games that “explain themselves”.
Anyone else feel similarly?
Tangentially related side note: I hate, hate, hate “Fandom” wikis. They’re probably a big part of the reason why I began to hate consulting online guides. They’re impossible to navigate, are riddled with ads, and link to unrelated content, everywhere on their pages. There is a good alternative to these for some Nintendo franchises, which are independent wikis, in case anyone is as frustrated by the Fandom slop as I am.
Looking at the submission rules for Clarkesworld Magazine, I found the following:
Statement on the Use of “AI” writing tools such as ChatGPT
We will not consider any submissions translated, written, developed, or assisted by these tools. Attempting to submit these works may result in being banned from submitting works in the future.
EDIT: I assume that Clarkesworld means a popular, non-technical understanding of AI meaning post-chatGPT LLMs specifically and not a broader definition of AI that is more academic or pertinent the computer science field.
I imagine that other magazines and website have similar rules. As someone who does not write directly in English, that is concerning. I have never translated without assistance in my life. In the past I used both Google Translate and Google Translator Toolkit (which no longer exist).
Of course, no machine translation is perfect, that was only a first pass that I would change, adapt and fix extensively and intensely. In the past I have used the built-in translation feature from Google Docs. However, now that Gemini is integrated in Google Docs, I suspected that it uses AI instead for translation. So I asked Gemini, and it said that it does. I am not sure if Gemini is correct, but, if it doesn't use AI now it probably will in the future.
That poses a problem for me, since, in the event that I wish to submit a story to English speaking magazines or websites, I will have to find a tool that is guaranteed to be dumb. I am sure they exist, but for how long? Will I be forced to translate my stories like a cave men? Is anyone concerned with keeping non-AI translation tools available, relevant, and updated? How can I even be sure that a translation tool does not use AI?
I've been deep in learning how to rewire sections of my house, trying to understand the logic behind my older (1950s-era) electrical system. In the process, I came across a free game on Steam called Wired developed by the University of Cambridge's Engineering Department. It's a puzzle game that gradually introduces core concepts in circuitry and logical flow. It doesn't replace proper training, but it is an engaging supplement compared to reading electrical code books.
But anyways, I though I would ask about games that don't just entertain but also teach. Not strictly edutainment in the shallow sense, but games that impart understanding, intuition, or practical knowledge through their mechanics.
What are some games you've played that taught you something substantial? I'm thinking anything from real world skills, conceptual insights, functional knowledge, or anything that stuck with you after playing.
I rarely ever used graters before, but in the past month or so I've been on a spring roll rampage. You've gotta have some whiskered cucumbers and carrots, and a mixture of impatience and inadequate knife skills means using a grater. Previously I had a super cheap one from Daiso, but that one broke so I got a nice new one from Oxo. And even though it's technically a lot more featured than the Japanese dollar store version I was using before, it's actually way worse. Today I tried to do a technique I've heard of, shredding tofu, and even though I was using extra-firm it crumbled instead of shredded.
The big difference between the Daiso and Oxo graters is that the Daiso one had maybe 3-4 rows of "teeth" doing the grating and the Oxo one has something like 15-20 of them. That gives you a heck of a lot more friction and you need to put a lot more force to use it. This doesn't just mean that your delicate food will be destroyed, it also means you have to press so hard that you risk your hand slipping and getting shredded. It also means you can't try to get large shreds because it will gum the process up.
In contrast, the fewer holes in the Japanese one would take more passes to shred the same amount of food, but each pass is so much easier because you have the benefit of being able to build up speed and momentum as you shred. It feels like you're making slices instead of trying to force food through a mesh. The holes are also in the center of the grater so each shred is going to be the full length of the thing you're grating.
Why is it that every western grater is built like this? Don't people realize how bad it is?
Spanish Grand Prix
Circuit de Barcelona-Catalunya
Sunday, June 1, 2025 - 13:00 UTC / 9:00a US EDT
| Pos | No | Driver | Car | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Laps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 81 | Oscar Piastri | McLaren Mercedes | 1:12.551 | 1:11.998 | 1:11.546 | 14 |
| 2 | 4 | Lando Norris | McLaren Mercedes | 1:12.799 | 1:12.056 | 1:11.755 | 15 |
| 3 | 1 | Max Verstappen | Red Bull Racing Honda RBPT | 1:12.798 | 1:12.358 | 1:11.848 | 12 |
| 4 | 63 | George Russell | Mercedes | 1:12.806 | 1:12.407 | 1:11.848 | 12 |
| 5 | 44 | Lewis Hamilton | Ferrari | 1:13.058 | 1:12.447 | 1:12.045 | 15 |
| 6 | 12 | Kimi Antonelli | Mercedes | 1:12.815 | 1:12.585 | 1:12.111 | 18 |
| 7 | 16 | Charles Leclerc | Ferrari | 1:13.014 | 1:12.495 | 1:12.131 | 12 |
| 8 | 10 | Pierre Gasly | Alpine Renault | 1:13.081 | 1:12.611 | 1:12.199 | 18 |
| 9 | 6 | Isack Hadjar | Racing Bulls Honda RBPT | 1:13.139 | 1:12.461 | 1:12.252 | 15 |
| 10 | 14 | Fernando Alonso | Aston Martin Aramco Mercedes | 1:13.102 | 1:12.523 | 1:12.284 | 14 |
| 11 | 23 | Alexander Albon | Williams Mercedes | 1:13.044 | 1:12.641 | 14 | |
| 12 | 5 | Gabriel Bortoleto | Kick Sauber Ferrari | 1:13.045 | 1:12.756 | 12 | |
| 13 | 30 | Liam Lawson | Racing Bulls Honda RBPT | 1:13.039 | 1:12.763 | 12 | |
| 14 | 18 | Lance Stroll | Aston Martin Aramco Mercedes | 1:13.038 | 1:13.058 | 15 | |
| 15 | 87 | Oliver Bearman | Haas Ferrari | 1:13.074 | 1:13.315 | 15 | |
| 16 | 27 | Nico Hulkenberg | Kick Sauber Ferrari | 1:13.190 | 6 | ||
| 17 | 31 | Esteban Ocon | Haas Ferrari | 1:13.201 | 9 | ||
| 18 | 55 | Carlos Sainz | Williams Mercedes | 1:13.203 | 6 | ||
| 19 | 43 | Franco Colapinto | Alpine Renault | 1:13.334 | 7 | ||
| 20 | 22 | Yuki Tsunoda | Red Bull Racing Honda RBPT | 1:13.385 | 6 |
Source: F1.com
| Pos | No | Driver | Car | Laps | Time/retired | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 81 | Oscar Piastri | McLaren Mercedes | 66 | 1:32:57.375 | 25 |
| 2 | 4 | Lando Norris | McLaren Mercedes | 66 | +2.471s | 18 |
| 3 | 16 | Charles Leclerc | Ferrari | 66 | +10.455s | 15 |
| 4 | 63 | George Russell | Mercedes | 66 | +11.359s | 12 |
| 5 | 27 | Nico Hulkenberg | Kick Sauber Ferrari | 66 | +13.648s | 10 |
| 6 | 44 | Lewis Hamilton | Ferrari | 66 | +15.508s | 8 |
| 7 | 6 | Isack Hadjar | Racing Bulls Honda RBPT | 66 | +16.022s | 6 |
| 8 | 10 | Pierre Gasly | Alpine Renault | 66 | +17.882s | 4 |
| 9 | 14 | Fernando Alonso | Aston Martin Aramco Mercedes | 66 | +21.564s | 2 |
| 10 | 1 | Max Verstappen | Red Bull Racing Honda RBPT | 66 | +21.826s | 1 |
| 11 | 30 | Liam Lawson | Racing Bulls Honda RBPT | 66 | +25.532s | 0 |
| 12 | 5 | Gabriel Bortoleto | Kick Sauber Ferrari | 66 | +25.996s | 0 |
| 13 | 22 | Yuki Tsunoda | Red Bull Racing Honda RBPT | 66 | +28.822s | 0 |
| 14 | 55 | Carlos Sainz | Williams Mercedes | 66 | +29.309s | 0 |
| 15 | 43 | Franco Colapinto | Alpine Renault | 66 | +31.381s | 0 |
| 16 | 31 | Esteban Ocon | Haas Ferrari | 66 | +32.197s | 0 |
| 17 | 87 | Oliver Bearman | Haas Ferrari | 66 | +37.065s | 0 |
| NC | 12 | Kimi Antonelli | Mercedes | 53 | DNF | 0 |
| NC | 23 | Alexander Albon | Williams Mercedes | 27 | DNF | 0 |
Fastest Lap: ?
DOTD: Max Verstappen (lol)
Source: F1.com
Next race:
Canadian Grand Prix
Circuit Gilles-Villeneuve
Sunday, June 15, 2025
The first Tildes Short Story Exchange is now open to submissions!
As previously announced, the first edition of the Tildes Short Story Exchange is now open to submissions!
I have, on many occasions, considered creating a fiction writing and feedback exchange workshop on Tildes. As these things often go, I exaggerated my plans, detailing them endlessly without ever putting them into action. This post is an attempt to break the cycle of procrastination, and I am doing so by forcing myself to adopt a much simpler approach.
The main goal of the Tildes Short Story Exchange is to allow people to get feedback on their short stories. Is it any good? How can I improve it?
Although there are many writing genres people like to share, short stories are among the most practical. They can be read much more quickly than novels and novellas, and their evaluation is simpler than what poetry requires. A simple, defined, and easy-to-understand prompt is conducive to creation. Every month, participants will know that the Tildes Short Story Exchange is a place to get feedback on short stories. They will feel compelled to write as a result.
This is a workshop for humans. Producing human connection is one of its main goals. Because of that, all submissions must be human-generated, both in full and in part. That said, LLMs can be used for the same things traditional tools such as Google Docs or Microsoft Word have been used for in the past: proofreading. Additionally, it is allowed to use LLMs to assist in translating into English text that you wrote yourself.
For the purposes of the TSSE, a short story is a work of fiction with 7,500 words or fewer. This is based on the classification by both the Hugo and Nebula awards. Stories that go a little above that will, of course, be accepted within reason. All submissions must be in English.
You may use any website, blog, format, or platform to share your story!
If you are inclined to share a PDF, please also share your story in a format that is open, allowing it to be easily converted and better displayed on mobile devices such as phones, tablets, Kindles, etc. Some good formats for that are .docx, .rtf, .odt, .epub, .mobi, .txt, .md (markdown).
If you are sharing your story on something like Google Drive or Microsoft Office Online, make sure to set the appropriate permissions!
I will make an effort to read and provide feedback on as many submissions as I can, and if you share it in an open format, it will at the very least have me as a reader!
You may also use detail markdown blocks to paste your story on Tildes itself (see "Expandable sections" in the Tildes docs here).
All short story submissions should be top-level comments on this post.
I drafted below an example submission that I encourage you to use. There are a few additional suggestions in there!
Title: My Super Cool Story
Genre(s): Science fiction, romance
Expected feedback: In this story I need feedback on story, language, everything. You can be as ruthless as you want. I can take it!
File: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ffWEjR7qP3Gfn693cLvOaRujetl6b_5x/
Title: The Day My Dog Died
Genre(s): Drama
Expected feedback: I'm really insecure about the ending. This is a very personal story—be gentle with me!
File: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ffWEjR7qP3Gfn693cLvOaRujetl6b_5x/
All feedback should be a direct response to short story submissions.
Feedback should always follow the guidelines put forth by the writer, but anything that is not explicitly prohibited can be understood to be allowed. There will be no strict rules on how feedback must be written, but I would suggest that everyone provide something potentially helpful to the improvement of the story. That is, of course, highly subjective.
Given that I am a regular Tildes user with no administrative privileges, all rules in this project will serve merely as guidelines that I suggest participants follow. There will be no enforcement or consequence for not following the guidelines. That means there will be no score, and no “feedback points” will be awarded. It is suggested that everyone seeking feedback provide at least one piece of feedback prior to posting their own story. But that will be entirely based on the “honor system,” and no admonitions will be made toward those who seek feedback without providing it.
The TSSE will feature one post on the 1st day of each month. This is to help with mnemonics so people always remember when it will happen. That will help them get their “creative mojo” working every month.
Exceptionally for this first edition, given that it is already May 3rd, the Tildes Short Story Exchange – First Edition will go up next Monday (May 5th) and remain as the current post until June 1st, when it will be replaced.
Within that period, everyone will be free to post their short stories and their feedback at their own leisure.
The schedule may change to once every two months if there is not enough activity.
This is the beginning of a permanent short fiction workshop on Tildes! Anyone is welcome to post their short stories and get feedback on them. For more information, please click on the information box above or visit the introduction post.
The TSSE will feature one post on the 1st day of each month. Exceptionally, this first edition will be up from today (Monday, May 5th) until June 1st, when it will be replaced.
During that period, everyone will be free to post their short stories and their feedback at their own leisure.
You may use any website, blog, format, or platform to share your story!
If you are inclined to share a PDF, please also share your story in a format that is open, allowing it to be easily converted and better displayed on mobile devices such as phones, tablets, Kindles, etc. Some good formats for that are .docx, .rtf, .odt, .epub, .mobi, .txt, .md (markdown).
If you are sharing your story on something like Google Drive or Microsoft Office Online, make sure to set the appropriate permissions!
You may also use detail markdown blocks to paste your story on Tildes itself (see "Expandable sections" in the Tildes docs here).
All short story submissions should be top-level comments on the TSSE posts.
I drafted below an example submission that I encourage you to use. You are not forced to follow this model—feel free to add any information you want in your submission.
**Title**: My Super Cool Story
**Word count**: 949
**Genre(s)**: Science fiction, romance
**Expected feedback**: In this story I need feedback on story, language, everything. You can be as ruthless as you want. I can take it!
**File or link**: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ffWEjR7qP3Gfn693cLvOaRujetl6b_5x/
**Title**: The Day My Dog Died
- **Word count**: 1500
**Genre(s)**: Drama
**Expected feedback**: I'm really insecure about the ending. This is a very personal story—be gentle with me!
**File or link**: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ffWEjR7qP3Gfn693cLvOaRujetl6b_5x/
All feedback should be a direct response to short story submissions.
Feedback should always follow the guidelines put forth by the writer, but anything that is not explicitly prohibited can be understood to be allowed. There will be no strict rules on how feedback must be written, but I would suggest that everyone provide something potentially helpful to the improvement of the story. That is, of course, highly subjective.
I understand that fast fashion brands aggressively cut costs to mass-produce as much trendy clothing as possible, so I'm not surprised when I see a low quality fast fashion item. However, what is surprising to me is that the clothes actually significantly vary in quality, even within the same brand. So in a fast fashion store you may find a garment made from the worst synthetic blend ever, with messy stitches that'll definitely tear apart after a single wash cycle. And then on the same shelf there'll be a fairly well-made item, from a sturdy natural fabric, with very precise seams and details. And oftentimes, those two garments will be sold at the same price point.
How does this happen? Do the fast fashion brands just randomly decide to spend more money on some of their clothes? Why don't they just make all of their clothes equally low-quality to cut costs, or make them all a bit better to increase satisfaction? How can a single company have such different quality standards for different products?
Have you watched any movies recently you want to discuss? Any films you want to recommend or are hyped about? Feel free to discuss anything here.
Please just try to provide fair warning of spoilers if you can.
Top eidt: Thread is four hours old and already seems to have support. I'll create the first actual thread tomorrow. So please, your feedback is desired on anything you'd lke to see in the initial topic text. Also, I'm thinking fortnightly (every two weeks) might be good to start, but feedback will always be desired. Original thread follows:
https://tildes.net/~life/1o92/how_my_life_changed_with_adhd_medication#comments
That thread brought so many with ADHD out of the woodwork.
I wonder if there might be a use for a recurring (weekly? monthly?) thread for ADHD support?
I'd envision it for:
Sort of like an ADHD club on Tildes that might help us all.
I know I am in love with the thread I linked just having so many of us there talking about this stuff. Reading others struggle with the same things I struggle with is comforting; reading others talking about conquering problems is lovely. And I know my "walking thread" is related to this idea - I started it to try and get folks from the community help keep me on track, so maybe that sort of thing would help others, too. (At least for some of us who aren't medicated! But even for medicated folks who could use that support)
So this is intended as a meta thread on the topic to see if the idea might have merit.
I think recurring threads are made manually, so I do volunteer to do that; but if the idea is a go and someone else would prefer to do it, I will certainly bow to that :)
(Also, it's my humble opinion that any autistic-related subjects would be quite welcome - I feel ADHD and autism are sibling diagnoses, even when they don't both apply to one person. Adn for that matter, anyone dealign with ADHD-adjacent issues - like how anxiety can sometimes present with ADHD-like symptoms - the venting and help-with-accomplishing-things should not be limited to JUST adhd folks, but I envision this as primarily and ADHD space that welcomes all. But my vision is up for discussion, IF the idea even has merit)
Find yourself watching tons of great videos on [insert chosen video sharing platform], but also find yourself reluctant to flood the Tildes front page with them? Then this thread is for you.
It could be one quirky video that you feel deserves some eyeballs on it, or perhaps you've got a curated list of videos that you'd love to talk us through...
Share some of the best video content you've watched this past week/fortnight with us!
Haven't seen a whole lot of discussion about this show on tildes. Not in weekly threads nor a main thread - so here is one!
It's a 9/10 for me.
I waited until all of season 2 was out before starting it. Realized I had forgotten almost everything since season 1 though, so rewatched that first. It turned into a binge of both seasons - I just could not stop! It has been probably 3 years since I was so glued to the screen and this engaged in a tv show (Euphoria season 1),
I will skip an analysis or further review but every character was good. Every actor delivered. Just great all around. Season 2 (9.5/10) even better than season 1 (8.5/10).
So anyways, discuss! More than happy to have my feelings about it validated lol, and also see other takes on it.
Tildes is a very serious site, where we discuss very serious matters like socialism, videos and gender affirming care. Tags culled from the highest voted topics from the last seven days, if anyone was obsessive.
But one of my favourite tags happens to be offbeat! Taking its original inspiration from Sir Nils Olav III, this thread is looking for any far-fetched offbeat stories lurking in the newspapers. It may not deserve its own post, but it deserves a wider audience!
Have you watched any movies recently you want to discuss? Any films you want to recommend or are hyped about? Feel free to discuss anything here.
Please just try to provide fair warning of spoilers if you can.
Inspired by my long-ago try at Witcher 3, during which I died in the tutorial by falling off a platform. Yeah, definitely one of the lamest deaths possible. Gotta wonder what the others present thought about the legendary Geralt of Rivia dying from a simple fall, like geez isn't this guy supposed to be a living legend who's faced giant monsters that could fell armies?? I'm pretty sure the tutorial was a dream of a memory so his death didn't matter, but since then I've wondered:
How screwed would various video game worlds be if the hero dies during the tutorial of all things?
Figured this might be a fun question to ponder since there's so many possibilities. So think of any game with a tutorial where you can die, and then think about the consequences! Maybe you did die, maybe you didn't or came close. And maybe those potential deaths were super lame and super anticlimactic, leaving the other characters to just stare blankly because this guy casually walked right off a cliff, as if expecting some invisible barrier to stop them.
It's just fun to think of how the rest of the cast moves on without the protagonist—you know, assuming they can actually survive the game's plot without you. Or maybe they'll actually be better off...
Part of my role at work is in security policy & implementation. I can't figure this out so maybe someone will have some advice.
With the advent of AI coding, people who don't know how to code now start to use the AI to automate their work. This isn't new - previously they might use already other low code tools like Excel, UIPath, n8n, etc. but it still require learning the tools to use it. Now, anyone can "vibe coding" and get an output, which is fine for engineers who understand how the output should work and can design how it should be tested (edge cases, etc.)
I had a team come up with me that they managed to automate their work, which is good, but they did it with ChatGPT and the code works as they expected, but they doesn't fully understand how the code works and of course they're deploying this "to production" which means they're setting up an environment that supposed to be for internal tools, but use real customer data fed in from the production systems.
If you're an engineer, usually this violates a lot of policies - you should get the code peer reviewed by people who know what it does (incl. business context), the QA should test the code and think about edge cases and the best ways to test it and sign it off, the code should be developed & tested in non-production environment with fake data.
I can't think of a way non-engineers can do this - they cannot read code (and it get worse if you need two people in the same team to review each other) and if you're outsourcing it to AI, the AI company doesn't accept liability, nor you can retrain the AI from postmortems. The only way is to include lessons learned into the prompt, and I guess at some point it will become one long holy bible everyone has to paste into the limited context window. They are not trained to work on non-production data (if you ever try, usually they'll claim that the data doesn't match production - which I think because they aren't trained to design and test for edge cases). The only way to solve this directly is asking engineers to review them, but engineers aren't cheap and they're best doing something more important.
So far I think the best way to approach this problem is to think of it like Excel - the formulas are always safe to use - they don't send data to the internet, they don't create malware, etc. The worst think they can do is probably destroy that file or hangs your PC. And people don't know how to write VBA so they never do it. Now you have people copy pasting VBA code that they don't understand. The new AI workspace has to be done by building technical guardrails that the AI are limited to. I think it has to be done in some low-code tools that people using AI has to use (like say n8n). For example, blocks that do computation can be used, blocks that send data to the intranet/internet or run arbitrary code requires approval before use. And engineers can build safe blocks that can be used, such as sending messages to Slack that can only be used to send to corporate workspace only.
Does your work has adjusted policies for this AI epidemic? or other ideas that you wanted to share?
Monaco Grand Prix
Circuit de Monaco
Sunday, May 25, 2025
Qualification:
Saturday, May 24, 2025 - 14:00 UTC / 10:00a US EDT
Grand Prix:
Sunday, May 25, 2025 - 13:00 UTC / 9:00a US EDT
| Pos | No | Driver | Car | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Laps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | Lando Norris | McLaren Mercedes | 1:11.285 | 1:10.570 | 1:09.954 | 27 |
| 2 | 16 | Charles Leclerc | Ferrari | 1:11.229 | 1:10.581 | 1:10.063 | 27 |
| 3 | 81 | Oscar Piastri | McLaren Mercedes | 1:11.308 | 1:10.858 | 1:10.129 | 29 |
| 4 | 44 | Lewis Hamilton | Ferrari | 1:11.575 | 1:10.883 | 1:10.382 | 28 |
| 5 | 1 | Max Verstappen | Red Bull Racing Honda RBPT | 1:11.431 | 1:10.875 | 1:10.669 | 21 |
| 6 | 6 | Isack Hadjar | Racing Bulls Honda RBPT | 1:11.811 | 1:11.040 | 1:10.923 | 27 |
| 7 | 14 | Fernando Alonso | Aston Martin Aramco Mercedes | 1:11.674 | 1:11.182 | 1:10.924 | 30 |
| 8 | 31 | Esteban Ocon | Haas Ferrari | 1:11.839 | 1:11.262 | 1:10.942 | 32 |
| 9 | 30 | Liam Lawson | Racing Bulls Honda RBPT | 1:11.818 | 1:11.250 | 1:11.129 | 26 |
| 10 | 23 | Alexander Albon | Williams Mercedes | 1:11.629 | 1:10.732 | 1:11.213 | 34 |
| 11 | 55 | Carlos Sainz | Williams Mercedes | 1:11.707 | 1:11.362 | 25 | |
| 12 | 22 | Yuki Tsunoda | Red Bull Racing Honda RBPT | 1:11.800 | 1:11.415 | 20 | |
| 13 | 27 | Nico Hulkenberg | Kick Sauber Ferrari | 1:11.871 | 1:11.596 | 23 | |
| 14 | 63 | George Russell | Mercedes | 1:11.507 | 13 | ||
| 15 | 12 | Kimi Antonelli | Mercedes | 1:11.880 | 11 | ||
| 16 | 5 | Gabriel Bortoleto | Kick Sauber Ferrari | 1:11.902 | 13 | ||
| 17 | 87 | Oliver Bearman | Haas Ferrari | 1:11.979 | 13 | ||
| 18 | 10 | Pierre Gasly | Alpine Renault | 1:11.994 | 11 | ||
| 19 | 18 | Lance Stroll | Aston Martin Aramco Mercedes | 1:12.563 | 11 | ||
| 20 | 43 | Franco Colapinto | Alpine Renault | 1:12.597 | 12 |
"Note: Stroll penalised one grid position for causing a collision during practice. Bearman penalised 10 positions for overtaking under red flags in practice."
Source: F1.com
| Pos | No | Driver | Car | Laps | Time/retired | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | Lando Norris | McLaren Mercedes | 78 | 1:40:33.843 | 25 |
| 2 | 16 | Charles Leclerc | Ferrari | 78 | +3.131s | 18 |
| 3 | 81 | Oscar Piastri | McLaren Mercedes | 78 | +3.658s | 15 |
| 4 | 1 | Max Verstappen | Red Bull Racing Honda RBPT | 78 | +20.572s | 12 |
| 5 | 44 | Lewis Hamilton | Ferrari | 78 | +51.387s | 10 |
| 6 | 6 | Isack Hadjar | Racing Bulls Honda RBPT | 77 | +1 lap | 8 |
| 7 | 31 | Esteban Ocon | Haas Ferrari | 77 | +1 lap | 6 |
| 8 | 30 | Liam Lawson | Racing Bulls Honda RBPT | 77 | +1 lap | 4 |
| 9 | 23 | Alexander Albon | Williams Mercedes | 76 | +2 laps | 2 |
| 10 | 55 | Carlos Sainz | Williams Mercedes | 76 | +2 laps | 1 |
| 11 | 63 | George Russell | Mercedes | 76 | +2 laps | 0 |
| 12 | 87 | Oliver Bearman | Haas Ferrari | 76 | +2 laps | 0 |
| 13 | 43 | Franco Colapinto | Alpine Renault | 76 | +2 laps | 0 |
| 14 | 5 | Gabriel Bortoleto | Kick Sauber Ferrari | 76 | +2 laps | 0 |
| 15 | 18 | Lance Stroll | Aston Martin Aramco Mercedes | 76 | +2 laps | 0 |
| 16 | 27 | Nico Hulkenberg | Kick Sauber Ferrari | 76 | +2 laps | 0 |
| 17 | 22 | Yuki Tsunoda | Red Bull Racing Honda RBPT | 76 | +2 laps | 0 |
| 18 | 12 | Kimi Antonelli | Mercedes | 75 | +3 laps | 0 |
| NC | 14 | Fernando Alonso | Aston Martin Aramco Mercedes | 36 | DNF | 0 |
| NC | 10 | Pierre Gasly | Alpine Renault | 7 | DNF | 0 |
Fastest Lap: Lando Norris, 1:13.221 on lap 78
DOTD: Charles Leclerc
Next race:
Spanish Grand Prix
Circuit de Barcelona-Catalunya
Sunday, June 1, 2025
Ever since I was a kid, I thought planetary rings were cool, and whenever I scribbled a non-specific alien planet I would give it rings. Lately I have been worldbuilding for a story, and naturally I gave the world rings. But since I made that decision, I've paid more attention to rings in other sci-fi I watch.
There's a lot of sci-fi planets out there with their own Saturn-esque rings. Very often it's just there for the vibes. In the opening to Rogue One, for instance, Galen Erso's farm is on a planet with rings, but this doesn't really come up or affect the plot in any way. I forgot this until I recently rewatched the movie. Similarly in the Foundation series on Apple TV+, even though the protagonist is from an ocean planet with rings (that are beautifully rendered), the rings never really come up. The endless ocean ends up driving both plot points in the show and the superstitious culture of the people who live there, but the ring does not. Maybe this is discussed more in the Foundation books but I'm not familiar with those.
Sometimes rings end up being plot relevant, like in Alien Romulus, where instead of being set dressing, the rings are an obstacle that can cause the space station to crash. Still, the rings don't directly impact the planet or the people who live there. The thing that more directly affects the colonists' lives is the atmosphere blocking the sunlight instead.
What really got me thinking was when I saw this Sci-Show video a few months ago about research that Earth possibly had rings about 450 million years ago. The rings lowered the overall global temperature and caused more extreme summers and winters due to light reflecting off of them. This made me realize rings can add quite a lot to the actual worldbuilding, since besides from the obvious cultural impact on any humanoid life, it can cause big environmental changes as well. This is pretty obvious when you consider how The Moon can do many things that affect life on Earth such as the tides.
Of course there's nothing wrong with stories hand waving away these types of questions, but it's interesting when stories like Three Body Problem take these tropes like living in a multi-star system and consider how that would mess with the people living there.
Astronomy nerds and sci-fi fans of Tildes, are there any other interesting ways rings would affect life on a planet?
Opinion
Video links go unwatched.
This gets even more true the longer the videos are.
I think it helps to post a 2-3 line summary of what people can expect to find in the video.
There is just too much content in the Internet for many people to watch a video, just because it is posted, even if it has an interesting title.
This isn't just about crimes like the identity of Jack the Ripper, DB Cooper, the fate of the two English princes locked in the Tower of London, or what happened to Jimmy Hoffa. There are so many mysteries throughout history that are unlikely to ever be fully solved or explained, that we can only theorize about.
What is the Voynich Manuscript? Who was the Man in the Iron Mask? Why was the Mary Celeste abandoned? What's up with the Dyatlov Pass Incident? What's the real story behind the Pied Piper of Hamelin? What did Anne Boelyn really look like?
There's an infinite wealth of mysteries throughout history, so which ones do you find the most intriguing? Bonus points if they're more obscure, or a smaller local one!
Tildes is a very serious site, where we discuss very serious matters like seismology, minimalism.digital and charles dickens. Tags culled from the highest voted topics from the last seven days, if anyone was nerding out.
But one of my favourite tags happens to be offbeat! Taking its original inspiration from Sir Nils Olav III, this thread is looking for any far-fetched offbeat stories lurking in the newspapers. It may not deserve its own post, but it deserves a wider audience!
Have you watched any movies recently you want to discuss? Any films you want to recommend or are hyped about? Feel free to discuss anything here.
Please just try to provide fair warning of spoilers if you can.
Emilia-Romagna Grand Prix
Autodromo Internazionale Enzo e Dino Ferrari
May 16-18, 2025
Qualification:
Saturday, May 17, 2025 - 14:00 UTC / 10:00a US EDT
Grand Prix:
Sunday, May 18, 2025 - 13:00 UTC / 9:00a US EDT
| Pos | No | Driver | Car | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Laps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 81 | Oscar Piastri | McLaren Mercedes | 1:15.500 | 1:15.214 | 1:14.670 | 18 |
| 2 | 1 | Max Verstappen | Red Bull Racing Honda RBPT | 1:15.175 | 1:15.394 | 1:14.704 | 17 |
| 3 | 63 | George Russell | Mercedes | 1:15.852 | 1:15.334 | 1:14.807 | 17 |
| 4 | 4 | Lando Norris | McLaren Mercedes | 1:15.894 | 1:15.261 | 1:14.962 | 19 |
| 5 | 14 | Fernando Alonso | Aston Martin Aramco Mercedes | 1:15.695 | 1:15.442 | 1:15.431 | 19 |
| 6 | 55 | Carlos Sainz | Williams Mercedes | 1:15.987 | 1:15.198 | 1:15.432 | 21 |
| 7 | 23 | Alexander Albon | Williams Mercedes | 1:16.123 | 1:15.521 | 1:15.473 | 20 |
| 8 | 18 | Lance Stroll | Aston Martin Aramco Mercedes | 1:15.817 | 1:15.497 | 1:15.581 | 21 |
| 9 | 6 | Isack Hadjar | Racing Bulls Honda RBPT | 1:16.253 | 1:15.510 | 1:15.746 | 17 |
| 10 | 10 | Pierre Gasly | Alpine Renault | 1:15.937 | 1:15.505 | 1:15.787 | 17 |
| 11 | 16 | Charles Leclerc | Ferrari | 1:16.108 | 1:15.604 | 14 | |
| 12 | 44 | Lewis Hamilton | Ferrari | 1:16.163 | 1:15.765 | 14 | |
| 13 | 12 | Kimi Antonelli | Mercedes | 1:15.943 | 1:15.772 | 13 | |
| 14 | 5 | Gabriel Bortoleto | Kick Sauber Ferrari | 1:16.340 | 1:16.260 | 15 | |
| 15 | 43 | Franco Colapinto | Alpine Renault | 1:16.256 | 5 | ||
| 16 | 30 | Liam Lawson | Racing Bulls Honda RBPT | 1:16.379 | 6 | ||
| 17 | 27 | Nico Hulkenberg | Kick Sauber Ferrari | 1:16.518 | 9 | ||
| 18 | 31 | Esteban Ocon | Haas Ferrari | 1:16.613 | 9 | ||
| 19 | 87 | Oliver Bearman | Haas Ferrari | 1:16.918 | 8 | ||
| NC | 22 | Yuki Tsunoda | Red Bull Racing Honda RBPT | DNF | 2 |
Source: F1.com
| Pos | No | Driver | Car | Laps | Time/retired | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | Max Verstappen | Red Bull Racing Honda RBPT | 63 | 1:31:33.199 | 25 |
| 2 | 4 | Lando Norris | McLaren Mercedes | 63 | +6.109s | 18 |
| 3 | 81 | Oscar Piastri | McLaren Mercedes | 63 | +12.956s | 15 |
| 4 | 44 | Lewis Hamilton | Ferrari | 63 | +14.356s | 12 |
| 5 | 23 | Alexander Albon | Williams Mercedes | 63 | +17.945s | 10 |
| 6 | 16 | Charles Leclerc | Ferrari | 63 | +20.774s | 8 |
| 7 | 63 | George Russell | Mercedes | 63 | +22.034s | 6 |
| 8 | 55 | Carlos Sainz | Williams Mercedes | 63 | +22.898s | 4 |
| 9 | 6 | Isack Hadjar | Racing Bulls Honda RBPT | 63 | +23.586s | 2 |
| 10 | 22 | Yuki Tsunoda | Red Bull Racing Honda RBPT | 63 | +26.446s | 1 |
| 11 | 14 | Fernando Alonso | Aston Martin Aramco Mercedes | 63 | +27.250s | 0 |
| 12 | 27 | Nico Hulkenberg | Kick Sauber Ferrari | 63 | +30.296s | 0 |
| 13 | 10 | Pierre Gasly | Alpine Renault | 63 | +31.424s | 0 |
| 14 | 30 | Liam Lawson | Racing Bulls Honda RBPT | 63 | +32.511s | 0 |
| 15 | 18 | Lance Stroll | Aston Martin Aramco Mercedes | 63 | +32.993s | 0 |
| 16 | 43 | Franco Colapinto | Alpine Renault | 63 | +33.411s | 0 |
| 17 | 87 | Oliver Bearman | Haas Ferrari | 63 | +33.808s | 0 |
| 18 | 5 | Gabriel Bortoleto | Kick Sauber Ferrari | 63 | +38.572s | 0 |
| NC | 12 | Kimi Antonelli | Mercedes | 44 | DNF | 0 |
| NC | 31 | Esteban Ocon | Haas Ferrari | 27 | DNF | 0 |
Fastest Lap: Max Verstappen (1:17.988 on lap 58)
DOTD: Max Verstappen
Source: F1.com
Next race:
Monaco Grand Prix
Circuit de Monaco
Sunday, May 25, 2025
I'm all for two-factor authentication, but what's the point of asking?
Everyone, proud to announce that after a week and nine hours the tildes archipelago is complete as of 6:51 AM ET! We, astoundingly, had only one release due to excessive backtracking and only one technical DNF out of sixteen games. (As a first-time host I'll take that as a win!) Otherwise two Radiances and the Hollow Knight said good night, the Ender Dragon ended, the Spire was (mostly) Slayed, Red ...'d, Bowser blasted big, Ganon's gone, Ganon's gone again, Rogues Legacied, John Darksoul prevailed, Doomguy doomed all over the place, and... Poker. Also we found that last strawberry. Jesus.
Big thanks to everyone who participated and hope you had fun! I'm thinking I'll throw a sign-up thread in a month or two to gather YAMLs and we'll trek through it again. Definitely excited to try some new games!
How do my fellow KH fans on tildes feel? I'm honestly kind of relieved. Gacha is an inherently predatory business model, and the game by all accounts was extremely unfun. It's still the first KH game to be outright cancelled mid development, so I'm still worried about what this means for the series.
I'm hoping that the devs never return to the mobile space.
I'm in the planning stages of a Viking-themed game I'll be running sometime next year, and I'm noticing a nice little progression in the armor types that ends with chain mail. When combined with a silver-based economy that cares more about the weight of the silver over the number of coins you have, that puts a lot of emphasis on looking towards magic for your better AC values, as armor will generally be more expensive and the (typically) highest tiers of armor--namely, plate mail, but also things like splint and banded mails--are simply unavailable for sale or amongst the majority of the enemies you might face.
That magic will most commonly be from the runecaster, probably, since there's a rune available that can be worn like a necklace and improve AC, as well as another that can reduce damage taken. Magic armor will still be--likely even moreso--coveted and sought out by the players.
A PC with average Dexterity can reasonably hit AC 3 (or AC 17 if you're used to ascending values); this assumes chain mail, shield, and a protection rune. Normally AC 3 (banded mail and a shield) is the best a starting PC (with no adjustment from Dex) can hope for in a traditional game.
Hey everyone, I am attempting to go vegan.
I just wanted to do a "vegan weekend", but I’m about a month in, and I'm feeling like I can keep this up. I've tried in the past, but there are far more vegan options than there were several years ago. If you are a vegan, please let me know any tips, tricks, etc. that you wish you knew sooner. If you are on the fence or curious about it, ask questions! Post your favorite vegan recipes in the comments or any online resources you recommend on veganism. General veganism thread.