• Activity
  • Votes
  • Comments
  • New
  • All activity
  • Showing only topics with the tag "ask". Back to normal view
    1. Interpreting the Open Database License

      For reference, here is the ODbL. There is a nice human readable summary. You can also read more in the Wikipedia entry. The most famous database available under the ODbL is OpenStreetMaps. I...

      For reference, here is the ODbL. There is a nice human readable summary. You can also read more in the Wikipedia entry.

      The most famous database available under the ODbL is OpenStreetMaps.

      I recently found out about OpenCorporates, which is a global database of companies, published under the ODbL. I thought this was great, so I applied for access to use the database for a project. I was denied because I'm not a journalist or a nonprofit and instead was invited to pay for access instead. And it's not cheap, likely because company databases are often used in the B2B space.

      I replied that this seemed to be in conflict with their mission, especially given that my project was focused on using the data to create a benefit to the public, and their response was that they wanted to protect against their database being copied.

      From my reading, this seems to be in direct conflict with the ODbL. Egregiously so, which has me thinking I'm missing something.

      Does anyone have any insight? It seems to me that the whole point of the ODbL license is to make data freely available. This is backed up by interpretations I came across while searching and by the ethos of other orgs using the license, such as OSM. What am I missing?

      Edit: I'm still excited to hear from anyone with knowledge in this area, or just general insights into how I'm misunderstanding the license.

      And also, having learned that The Open Data Commons, which publishes and maintains the ODbL, uses this definition of the concept of open... I'm leaning towards the interpretation that OpenCorporates wants the aura of using a reputable license with the word "open" in it, but isn't genuinely interested in the ethos. Which is disappointing but not shocking, they'd be far from the first.

      6 votes
    2. What is your 'Subway Take'?

      For those who are unfamiliar, Subway Takes is a popular short form internet talk show "in which the interviewees present and defend a unique or controversial opinion, called a 'take'" Takes are...

      For those who are unfamiliar, Subway Takes is a popular short form internet talk show "in which the interviewees present and defend a unique or controversial opinion, called a 'take'" Takes are usually halfbaked and/or tongue-in-cheek. Some popular examples include:

      There are too many states in America

      Everybody in New York has rich parents or is selling drugs

      Spirit Airlines does not deserve the hate

      Italians became white after 9/11

      So what's your take?

      43 votes
    3. This site is fast

      I have decent internet at home. I have great internet at work. Despite the speeds of those though, seemingly every website out there feels laggy and heavy. You click, you wait, you get a skeleton...

      I have decent internet at home.

      I have great internet at work.

      Despite the speeds of those though, seemingly every website out there feels laggy and heavy. You click, you wait, you get a skeleton of the page, with different elements that rapidly pop in until you're staring at the full site. You see the little loading animation on the tab for one, two, three seconds. It isn't exactly "slow" by any means, but it's far from instantaneous either.

      Clicking around the web these days feels like I'm playing a game with unignorable input lag.

      And I get it. The modern web is complex. It's genuinely a miracle that this is possible in the first place, so I really shouldn't be complaining that the bits traveling through the internet from dozens of servers thousands of miles away aren't getting here immediately.

      I get that high resolution screens require large images, and the ubiquity of video these days adds even more weight. I get that many websites are closer to applications than they are static pages.

      I'm not trying to take away from the awesome magic that is our modern miracle of connectivity in the slightest, and I'm appreciative to all the people here who spend their livelihoods working on it. Y'all are awesome.

      I'm just trying to say that, well, sometimes moving around on the web can drag. And when you've been using it for a long time, the dragging can get under your skin a little bit.

      However, my real point lies not in the rest of the internet, but here. I'm talking about this "heavy web" baseline as a contrast for one of the things I love about Tildes:

      it. is. so. snappy.

      I click, and BAM, the page is there. Immediately.

      It's sharp. It's crisp. It's no-nonsense. No waiting for elements to pop in. No subconsciously watching for the loading animation to stop so that I know I can start to interact with site.

      For general design reasons, I've always loved that Tildes is text-only, but more and more I appreciate that aspect simply because Tildes feels good to use because it is so quick and responsive. I don't know how much of that is due to the text-only part of things and how much of it is Deimos being a genius code wizard who made an amazing platform, but I'm happy about it regardless.

      This site has got zero input lag.

      And that feels great.

      88 votes
    4. Death in D&D 5e, the various revival spells, and their impact on the game

      While I ate breakfast, I watched a YouTube video speaking to how death becomes an inconvenience in D&D 5e as early as 5th level, despite the amount of weight that people generally put behind it in...

      While I ate breakfast, I watched a YouTube video speaking to how death becomes an inconvenience in D&D 5e as early as 5th level, despite the amount of weight that people generally put behind it in the moment. Here's a relevant transcript.

      Well, the obvious answer to this is to ban the spells that take away the permanence of death; that way there's stakes staying all the way through 20th level. The problem with this answer is that D&D isn't balanced around those spells not existing at later levels.

      I love Risk of Rain 2 but my biggest problem with that game is being 30 minutes into a run and getting one-shot, dying, and having to start all over. I couldn't imagine having that same feeling after playing FOUR YEARS in a campaign.

      I don't necessarily disagree with the first paragraph, but the second one is wild to me for two reasons.

      • First, Risk of Rain is a roguelike whose entire game loop is "do stuff, die, unlock/purchase meta progression, do more stuff, die, etc. etc.".
      • Second, the idea that you've been playing four years in a 5e game that's presumably weekly and somehow haven't hit 20th level. For context, 5e wants you hitting 20th level after 36-52 typical 4-hour sessions.

      This kind of sentiment really does highlight how distant the way I ran the game those eight years I spent with 5e and how the game wants to be run is to the way people appear to be running the game, and I'm not sure I'll ever be able to square that circle. Not to imply any kind of superiority to it, it just continues to be extremely weird/interesting to me how the culture surrounding D&D is so different from the expectations laid out by the very rules text people don't read.

      16 votes
    5. What are some interesting landmarks in your neck of the woods?

      Obviously I don't want anyone to dox themselves here, but if you're comfortable sharing, what are some interesting oddities or landmarks in your state, county, country, etc.? Think like "World's...

      Obviously I don't want anyone to dox themselves here, but if you're comfortable sharing, what are some interesting oddities or landmarks in your state, county, country, etc.?

      Think like "World's Largest Teapot" or "Carhenge". Or even smaller oddities or things that are unique to your area.

      31 votes
    6. What code editor / IDE do you use (2025)?

      For a while now I have used VSCodium- which is just Microsoft's VSCode, but with as much of the telemetry stripped out (or rather, not built-in in the first place) as possible- but I've found...

      For a while now I have used VSCodium- which is just Microsoft's VSCode, but with as much of the telemetry stripped out (or rather, not built-in in the first place) as possible- but I've found myself with a desire to move away from Electron-based apps for a number of reasons.

      Primarily, I'm ideologically opposed to the trend in which everything is an Electron-based web app packaged as a "desktop application", but on a slightly more functional note, Electron seems to behave poorly in Wayland contexts, especially on Arm64 devices.

      In terms of feature set, I'm not too interested in complexity. Something open-source, relatively clean / light-weight, capable of providing a project overview and a number of tabbed or vsplit / hsplit buffers. Something with comprehensive syntax highlighting and some form of language server interface. Something theme-able, and good to look at, with relatively intuitive or well-established keyboard shortcuts. I don't much care for integrated terminals, extensive debugging tooling, or any form of built-in AI assistant.

      I have been trying out Micro, with a set of plugins which allow for a project overview, a language server, and a number of other QOL improvements, but it has a list of breaking issues that will likely not be solved for years given the speed at which pull-requests are addressed, if at all. Even so- it hits most of the marks that I find most important to me.

      But I'm also interested in what other people use; what other programmers find matter to them. So what text editors, or IDEs do you swear by (and please don't suggest VIM- it's overwhelming ;])?

      43 votes
    7. Formula 1 United States Grand Prix 2025 - Race Weekend Discussion

      Warning: this post may contain spoilers

      United States Grand Prix
      Circuit of the Americas
      October 17-19, 2025


      Sprint Race Qualifying Results -- SPOILER
      Pos. No. Driver Team Q1 Q2 Q3 Laps
      1 1 Max Verstappen Red Bull Racing 1:33.363 1:33.163 1:32.143 12
      2 4 Lando Norris McLaren 1:33.224 1:33.033 1:32.214 12
      3 81 Oscar Piastri McLaren 1:33.889 1:33.371 1:32.523 13
      4 27 Nico Hulkenberg Kick Sauber 1:34.236 1:33.577 1:32.645 12
      5 63 George Russell Mercedes 1:34.653 1:33.462 1:32.888 13
      6 14 Fernando Alonso Aston Martin 1:34.737 1:33.951 1:32.910 12
      7 55 Carlos Sainz Williams 1:34.239 1:33.652 1:32.911 14
      8 44 Lewis Hamilton Ferrari 1:34.226 1:34.012 1:33.035 14
      9 23 Alexander Albon Williams 1:34.472 1:33.831 1:33.099 14
      10 16 Charles Leclerc Ferrari 1:34.913 1:33.938 1:33.104 15
      11 12 Kimi Antonelli Mercedes 1:34.414 1:34.018 11
      12 6 Isack Hadjar Racing Bulls 1:34.243 1:34.241 9
      13 10 Pierre Gasly Alpine 1:35.144 1:34.258 9
      14 18 Lance Stroll Aston Martin 1:34.988 1:34.394 10
      15 30 Liam Lawson Racing Bulls 1:34.603 DNF 8
      16 87 Oliver Bearman Haas F1 Team 1:35.159 5
      17 43 Franco Colapinto Alpine 1:35.246 6
      18 22 Yuki Tsunoda Red Bull Racing 1:35.259 5
      19 31 Esteban Ocon Haas F1 Team 1:36.003 5
      NC 5 Gabriel Bortoleto Kick Sauber DNF 5

      Source: F1.com

      Sprint Race Results -- SPOILER
      Pos. No. Driver Team Laps Time / Retired Pts.
      1 1 Max Verstappen Red Bull Racing 19 37:58.229 8
      2 63 George Russell Mercedes 19 +0.395s 7
      3 55 Carlos Sainz Williams 19 +0.791s 6
      4 44 Lewis Hamilton Ferrari 19 +1.224s 5
      5 16 Charles Leclerc Ferrari 19 +1.825s 4
      6 23 Alexander Albon Williams 19 +2.576s 3
      7 22 Yuki Tsunoda Red Bull Racing 19 +2.976s 2
      8 12 Kimi Antonelli Mercedes 19 +4.147s 1
      9 30 Liam Lawson Racing Bulls 19 +4.804s 0
      10 10 Pierre Gasly Alpine 19 +5.126s 0
      11 5 Gabriel Bortoleto Kick Sauber 19 +5.649s 0
      12 6 Isack Hadjar Racing Bulls 19 +6.228s 0
      13 27 Nico Hulkenberg Kick Sauber 19 +6.624s 0
      14 43 Franco Colapinto Alpine 19 +8.006s 0
      15 87 Oliver Bearman Haas F1 Team 19 +13.576s 0
      NC 31 Esteban Ocon Haas F1 Team 15 DNF 0
      NC 18 Lance Stroll Aston Martin 15 DNF 0
      NC 4 Lando Norris McLaren 0 DNF 0
      NC 81 Oscar Piastri McLaren 0 DNF 0
      NC 14 Fernando Alonso Aston Martin 0 DNF 0

      Source: F1.com

      Grand Prix Qualifying Results -- SPOILER
      Pos. No. Driver Team Q1 Q2 Q3 Laps
      1 1 Max Verstappen Red Bull Racing 1:33.207 1:32.701 1:32.510 14
      2 4 Lando Norris McLaren 1:33.843 1:32.876 1:32.801 20
      3 16 Charles Leclerc Ferrari 1:33.525 1:32.869 1:32.807 17
      4 63 George Russell Mercedes 1:33.311 1:33.058 1:32.826 19
      5 44 Lewis Hamilton Ferrari 1:33.685 1:32.914 1:32.912 18
      6 81 Oscar Piastri McLaren 1:33.746 1:33.228 1:33.084 19
      7 12 Kimi Antonelli Mercedes 1:33.501 1:33.044 1:33.114 18
      8 87 Oliver Bearman Haas F1 Team 1:33.921 1:33.238 1:33.139 19
      9 55 Carlos Sainz Williams 1:33.739 1:33.124 1:33.150 20
      10 14 Fernando Alonso Aston Martin 1:33.741 1:33.237 1:33.160 18
      11 27 Nico Hulkenberg Kick Sauber 1:33.551 1:33.334 14
      12 30 Liam Lawson Racing Bulls 1:33.549 1:33.360 14
      13 22 Yuki Tsunoda Red Bull Racing 1:33.935 1:33.466 13
      14 10 Pierre Gasly Alpine 1:33.599 1:33.651 14
      15 43 Franco Colapinto Alpine 1:34.039 1:34.044 14
      16 5 Gabriel Bortoleto Kick Sauber 1:34.125 8
      17 31 Esteban Ocon Haas F1 Team 1:34.136 8
      18 18 Lance Stroll Aston Martin 1:34.540 7
      19 23 Alexander Albon Williams 1:34.690 9
      RT 6 Isack Hadjar Racing Bulls 2

      Source: F1.com

      Grand Prix Results -- SPOILER
      Pos No Driver Car Laps Time/retired Pts

      Fastest Lap: Driver Person // 00:00.000 (lap 00)
      DOTD:

      Source: F1.com


      Next race:

      Mexico City Grand Prix
      Autódromo Hermanos Rodríguez
      October 24-26, 2025

      10 votes